Literature DB >> 19448105

Quality initiatives: developing a radiology quality and safety program: a primer.

C Daniel Johnson1, Karl N Krecke, Rafael Miranda, Catherine C Roberts, Charles Denham.   

Abstract

Four main areas of quality need to be addressed for a complete quality and safety program in radiology: safety, process improvement, professional outcome assessment, and satisfaction. These areas need to be coordinated by individuals who belong to a quality oversight committee. Management of the data can be facilitated by using a quality scorecard that posts relevant data for each operational group within a department. The ultimate goal is a cultural shift in which all departmental workers assume responsibility for quality and safety improvements and behave consistently with the core values of the organization. A road map for thinking about quality and safety issues in radiology allows all of these areas to be tied together. Four main areas of development are required, each demanding a different skill set and approach. Copyright RSNA, 2009

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19448105     DOI: 10.1148/rg.294095006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  18 in total

Review 1.  Nuclear medicine: what kind of quality would we want if we were the patient?

Authors:  Giovanni Lucignani; Angelo Del Sole
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  Early experience using an online reporting system for interventional radiology procedure-related complications integrated with a digital dictation system.

Authors:  Sanjay Gupta; Jay Patel; Kevin McEnery; Michael J Wallace; Kamran Ahrar; Chuck Suitor; Marshall E Hicks
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  A data-driven approach for quality assessment of radiologic interpretations.

Authors:  William Hsu; Simon X Han; Corey W Arnold; Alex At Bui; Dieter R Enzmann
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Implementation of a Point-of-Care Radiologist-Technologist Communication Tool in a Quality Assurance Program.

Authors:  Leonard Ong; Pierre Elnajjar; C Gregory Nyman; Thomas Mair; Krishna Juluru
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 5.  Innovation opportunities in critical results communication: theoretical concepts.

Authors:  Bruce I Reiner
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 6.  Academic radiology in the new health care delivery environment.

Authors:  Aliya Qayyum; John-Paul J Yu; Akash P Kansagra; Nathaniel von Fischer; Daniel Costa; Matthew Heller; Stamatis Kantartzis; R Scooter Plowman; Jason Itri
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.173

7.  Pediatric interventional radiology clinic - how are we doing?

Authors:  Jonathan Rubenstein; Julie C Zettel; Eric Lee; Michelle Cote; Albert Aziza; Bairbre L Connolly
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2016-04-06

8.  QuIRI (quality improvement and research in imaging) program: a means to promote and coordinate research and quality-improvement activities in radiology.

Authors:  Lane F Donnelly
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2011-02-01

9.  The Daily Readiness Huddle: a process to rapidly identify issues and foster improvement through problem-solving accountability.

Authors:  Lane F Donnelly; Shirley S Cherian; Kimberly B Chua; Sam Thankachan; Laura A Millecker; Alex G Koroll; George S Bisset
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2016-10-22

10.  Four-year impact of an alert notification system on closed-loop communication of critical test results.

Authors:  Ronilda Lacson; Luciano M Prevedello; Katherine P Andriole; Stacy D O'Connor; Christopher Roy; Tejal Gandhi; Anuj K Dalal; Luke Sato; Ramin Khorasani
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 3.959

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.