Niya Zhou1, Lei Sun1, Huan Yang1, Qing Chen1, Xiaogang Wang1, Hao Yang2, Lu Tan1, Hongqiang Chen1, Guowei Zhang1, Xi Ling1, Linping Huang1, Peng Zou1, Kaige Peng1, Taixiu Liu1, Jinyi Liu1, Lin Ao1, Ziyuan Zhou3, Zhihong Cui4, Jia Cao4. 1. Key Lab of Medical Protection for Electromagnetic Radiation, Ministry of Education of China, Institute of Toxicology, College of Preventive Medicine, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, PR China. 2. Chongqing Institute of Science and Technology for Population and Family Planning, Chongqing, PR China. 3. Department of Environmental Health, College of Preventive Medicine, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, PR China. 4. Key Lab of Medical Protection for Electromagnetic Radiation, Ministry of Education of China, Institute of Toxicology, College of Preventive Medicine, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, PR China caojia1962@126.com zhihongcui_4@126.com.
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION: Is anogenital distance associated with semen parameters and serum reproductive hormone levels in males? SUMMARY ANSWER: Anogenital distance is associated with serum reproductive hormones, but not with semen quality. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Epidemiological studies have suggested that anogenital distance (AGD) may be associated with testicular dysfunction in adult men. However, the role of AGD in estimating male reproductive function remains unclear. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: We examined the associations between AGD and semen parameters and reproductive hormones levels in 656 young college students in a Male Reproductive Health in Chongqing College Students (MARHCSs) cohort study in June of 2014. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: In this study, two variants of AGD (AGDAP and AGDAS) were measured in 656 university students. Serum levels of testosterone (T), estradiol (E2), progesterone (P), prolactin (PRL), luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) and inhibin-B; and semen quality outcomes, including semen volume, sperm concentration, total sperm number, sperm progressive motility, total motility and morphology, were assessed. The associations between AGD and semen parameters/reproductive hormones levels were analyzed using multiple regression analysis. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Both AGDAS and AGDAP were not associated with any semen parameters. In the non-parametric correlation analysis, AGDAP were correlated with sperm progressive motility and reproductive hormones of E2, testosterone, SHBG and the testosterone/LH ratio. However, body mass index (BMI) also significantly correlated with serum testosterone ( ITALIC! r = -0.216, ITALIC! P = <0.0001) and SHBG ( ITALIC! r = -0.229, ITALIC! P = <0.001). In the multiple regression models, AGDAP was negatively associated with the serum E2 level (95% CI, -0.198 to -0.043; ITALIC! P = 0.002) and positively associated with the ratio of T/E2 (95% CI, 0.004-0.011; ITALIC! P = 0.001) after an adjustment for BMI and other confounders. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Using only a single semen sample to predict male reproductive function over a longer period is a potential limitation of the present study. The other limitation is the cross-sectional nature of the study design. Longitudinal data from an extended follow-up on a large cohort would be more definitive. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Our results do not support previous studies where AGD is associated with male semen quality. The utility of AGD in predicting reproductive outcomes in adult males should thus be considered prudently. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: This study was supported by the Key Program of Natural Science Funding of China (no. 81130051), Young Scientist Program of NSFC (no. 81502788) and the National Scientific and Technological Support Program of China (no. 2013BAI12B02). None of authors had any competing interests to declare.
STUDY QUESTION: Is anogenital distance associated with semen parameters and serum reproductive hormone levels in males? SUMMARY ANSWER: Anogenital distance is associated with serum reproductive hormones, but not with semen quality. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Epidemiological studies have suggested that anogenital distance (AGD) may be associated with testicular dysfunction in adult men. However, the role of AGD in estimating male reproductive function remains unclear. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: We examined the associations between AGD and semen parameters and reproductive hormones levels in 656 young college students in a Male Reproductive Health in Chongqing College Students (MARHCSs) cohort study in June of 2014. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: In this study, two variants of AGD (AGDAP and AGDAS) were measured in 656 university students. Serum levels of testosterone (T), estradiol (E2), progesterone (P), prolactin (PRL), luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) and inhibin-B; and semen quality outcomes, including semen volume, sperm concentration, total sperm number, sperm progressive motility, total motility and morphology, were assessed. The associations between AGD and semen parameters/reproductive hormones levels were analyzed using multiple regression analysis. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Both AGDAS and AGDAP were not associated with any semen parameters. In the non-parametric correlation analysis, AGDAP were correlated with sperm progressive motility and reproductive hormones of E2, testosterone, SHBG and the testosterone/LH ratio. However, body mass index (BMI) also significantly correlated with serum testosterone ( ITALIC! r = -0.216, ITALIC! P = <0.0001) and SHBG ( ITALIC! r = -0.229, ITALIC! P = <0.001). In the multiple regression models, AGDAP was negatively associated with the serum E2 level (95% CI, -0.198 to -0.043; ITALIC! P = 0.002) and positively associated with the ratio of T/E2 (95% CI, 0.004-0.011; ITALIC! P = 0.001) after an adjustment for BMI and other confounders. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Using only a single semen sample to predict male reproductive function over a longer period is a potential limitation of the present study. The other limitation is the cross-sectional nature of the study design. Longitudinal data from an extended follow-up on a large cohort would be more definitive. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Our results do not support previous studies where AGD is associated with male semen quality. The utility of AGD in predicting reproductive outcomes in adult males should thus be considered prudently. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: This study was supported by the Key Program of Natural Science Funding of China (no. 81130051), Young Scientist Program of NSFC (no. 81502788) and the National Scientific and Technological Support Program of China (no. 2013BAI12B02). None of authors had any competing interests to declare.
Authors: Sander van den Driesche; Karen R Kilcoyne; Ida Wagner; Diane Rebourcet; Ashley Boyle; Rod Mitchell; Chris McKinnell; Sheila Macpherson; Roland Donat; Chitranjan J Shukla; Anne Jorgensen; Ewa Rajpert-De Meyts; Niels E Skakkebaek; Richard M Sharpe Journal: JCI Insight Date: 2017-03-23
Authors: Lærke Priskorn; Jørgen H Petersen; Niels Jørgensen; Henriette B Kyhl; Marianne S Andersen; Katharina M Main; Anna-Maria Andersson; Niels E Skakkebaek; Tina K Jensen Journal: Pediatr Res Date: 2017-12-20 Impact factor: 3.756
Authors: L Priskorn; A K Bang; L Nordkap; M Krause; J Mendiola; T K Jensen; A Juul; N E Skakkebaek; S H Swan; N Jørgensen Journal: Hum Reprod Date: 2019-01-01 Impact factor: 6.918
Authors: Fuensanta Navarro-Lafuente; Julián J Arense-Gonzalo; Evdochia Adoamnei; María T Prieto-Sánchez; María L Sánchez-Ferrer; Luis García-Marcos; Eva Morales; Jaime Mendiola; Alberto M Torres-Cantero Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-06-11 Impact factor: 3.390