Literature DB >> 27051256

Factors Affecting Long-term Myopic Regression after Laser In Situ Keratomileusis and Laser-assisted Subepithelial Keratectomy for Moderate Myopia.

Sung A Lim1, Yooyeon Park1, Yu Jin Cheong2, Kyung Sun Na3, Choun-Ki Joo1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: High myopia is known to be a risk factor for long-term regression after laser refractive surgery. There have been few studies about the correction of moderate myopias that did not need retreatment after long-term follow-up. We evaluated 10 years of change in visual acuity and refractive power in eyes with moderate myopia after laser refractive surgery.
METHODS: We included patients that had undergone laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) or laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) to correct their myopia and that had at least 10 years of follow-up. We evaluated the stability of visual acuity in terms of safety, efficacy, and refractive changes at examinations 6 months and 1, 2, 5, 7, and 10 years after surgery.
RESULTS: The study evaluated 62 eyes (36 eyes in LASIK patients and 26 eyes in LASEK patients). In both groups, the efficacy index tended to decrease, and it was consistently higher in the LASEK group compared to the LASIK group over the 10 years of follow-up. The safety index improved over 10 years and was always higher than 0.9 in both groups. The difference between the spherical equivalent at 6 months postoperatively and later periods was statistically significant after 5, 7, and 10 years in both groups (LASIK, p = 0.036, p = 0.003, and p < 0.001, respectively; LASEK, p = 0.006, p = 0.002, and p = 0.001, respectively). Ten years after surgery,26 eyes (66.7%) in the LASIK group and 19 eyes (73.1%) in the LASEK group had myopia greater than 1 diopter. In comparison with the thickness at 6 months postoperatively, central corneal thickness was significantly increased after 5, 7, and 10 years in both LASIK and LASEK groups (LASIK, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively; LASEK, p = 0.01, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Moderately myopic eyes showed progressive myopic shifting and corneal thickening after LASIK and LASEK during 10 years of follow-up. We also found that early refractive regression may indicate the long-term refractive outcome.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Laser in situ keratomileusis; Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy; Refractive regression

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27051256      PMCID: PMC4820531          DOI: 10.3341/kjo.2016.30.2.92

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1011-8942


  29 in total

1.  Stability after laser in situ keratomileusis in moderately and extremely myopic eyes.

Authors:  R Magallanes; S Shah; D Zadok; A S Chayet; K K Assil; M Montes; N Robledo
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.351

2.  [Multifactor analysis of the reasons causing undercorrection after laser in situ keratomileusis].

Authors:  Han-qiang Liu; Jing-pu Shi; Chang-rong Ma; Hui Zhang; Xiao-li Ma; Ying Jin; Xue-hai Jin; Hai-long Wang
Journal:  Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2003-04

3.  Differences between regressive eyes and non-regressive eyes after LASIK for myopia in the time course of corneal changes assessed with the Orbscan.

Authors:  Qing Pan; Yang-Shun Gu; Jing Wang; Ye Sheng; Chi-xin Du; Zhi-ming Huang; Shuang-hua Xin
Journal:  Ophthalmologica       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.250

4.  Is the corneal contour influenced by a tension in the superficial epithelial cells? A new hypothesis.

Authors:  H G Dierick; L Missotten
Journal:  Refract Corneal Surg       Date:  1992 Jan-Feb

5.  Appreciating the consequences of disease: the international classification of impairments, disabilities, and handicaps.

Authors:  P H Wood
Journal:  WHO Chron       Date:  1980-10

6.  Laser in situ keratomileusis for -6.00 to -18.00 diopters of myopia and up to -5.00 diopters of astigmatism: 15-year follow-up.

Authors:  Jorge L Alió; Felipe Soria; Alessandro Abbouda; Pablo Peña-García
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 3.351

7.  [Myopic regression after photorefractive keratectomy].

Authors:  G Pang; S Zhan; Y Li; Y Jin; Y Sun; W Li
Journal:  Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi       Date:  1998-11

8.  Laser in situ keratomileusis versus laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy for the correction of high myopia.

Authors:  Jin Kook Kim; Sung Soo Kim; Hyung Keun Lee; In Sik Lee; Gong Je Seong; Eung Kweon Kim; Sueng Han Han
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.351

9.  Effect of myopic laser in situ keratomileusis on epithelial and stromal thickness: a confocal microscopy study.

Authors:  Jay C Erie; Sanjay V Patel; Jay W McLaren; Manuel Ramirez; David O Hodge; Leo J Maguire; William M Bourne
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  Role of the corneal epithelium in refractive changes following laser in situ keratomileusis for high myopia.

Authors:  L Spadea; R Fasciani; S Necozione; E Balestrazzi
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2000 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.573

View more
  11 in total

1.  Predictors affecting myopic regression in - 6.0D to - 10.0D myopia after laser-assisted subepithelial keratomileusis and laser in situ keratomileusis flap creation with femtosecond laser-assisted or mechanical microkeratome-assisted.

Authors:  Jihong Zhou; Wei Gu; Shaowei Li; Lijuan Wu; Yan Gao; Xiuhua Guo
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 2.031

2.  Twelve-Year Follow-Up of Laser In Situ Keratomileusis for Moderate to High Myopia.

Authors:  Tetsuya Ikeda; Kimiya Shimizu; Akihito Igarashi; Sumie Kasahara; Kazutaka Kamiya
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Comparative evaluation of visual outcomes and corneal asphericity after laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis with the six-dimension Amaris excimer laser system.

Authors:  JunJie Piao; Ying-Jun Li; Woong-Joo Whang; Mihyun Choi; Min Ji Kang; Jee Hye Lee; Geunyoung Yoon; Choun-Ki Joo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Refractive, visual, and subjective quality of vision outcomes for very high myopia LASIK from - 10.00 to - 13.50 diopters.

Authors:  Avi Wallerstein; Joseph Wai Keung Kam; Mathieu Gauvin; Eser Adiguzel; Mounir Bashour; Ananda Kalevar; Mark Cohen
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 2.209

5.  Recurrent refractive error after myopic laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis - What could be the reason?

Authors:  Radhika Natarajan; Raj S Paul
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 1.848

6.  Comparison of outcomes of laser refractive surgery (LRS) alone and LRS with laser asymmetric keratectomy in patients with myopia: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Ji Sang Min; Byung Moo Min
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 1.817

7.  Is the axial length a risk factor for post-LASIK myopic regression?

Authors:  Amr A Gab-Alla
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-10-31       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Recent trends of refractive surgery rate and detailed analysis of subjects with refractive surgery: The 2008-2015 Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

Authors:  Yunjin Lee; Ji Soo Kim; Un Chul Park; Juwon Lim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Comparison of changes in refractive error and corneal curvature following small-incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis surgery.

Authors:  Ya L Zhang; Li J Cao; Hong W Chen; Xiang H Xu; Zhao N Li; Lei Liu
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 1.848

Review 10.  Complications of laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  Pranita Sahay; Rahul Kumar Bafna; Jagadesh C Reddy; Rasik B Vajpayee; Namrata Sharma
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-07       Impact factor: 1.848

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.