Literature DB >> 19923478

Wild-type MIC distributions and epidemiological cutoff values for the echinocandins and Candida spp.

M A Pfaller1, L Boyken, R J Hollis, J Kroeger, S A Messer, S Tendolkar, R N Jones, J Turnidge, D J Diekema.   

Abstract

We tested a global collection of Candida sp. strains against anidulafungin, caspofungin, and micafungin, using CLSI M27-A3 broth microdilution (BMD) methods, in order to define wild-type (WT) populations and epidemiological cutoff values (ECVs). From 2003 to 2007, 8,271 isolates of Candida spp. (4,283 C. albicans, 1,236 C. glabrata, 1,238 C. parapsilosis, 996 C. tropicalis, 270 C. krusei, 99 C. lusitaniae, 88 C. guilliermondii, and 61 C. kefyr isolates) were obtained from over 100 centers worldwide. The modal MICs (in microg/ml) for anidulafungin, caspofungin, and micafungin, respectively, for each species were as follows: C. albicans, 0.03, 0.03, 0.015; C. glabrata, 0.06, 0.03, 0.015; C. tropicalis, 0.03, 0.03, 0.015; C. kefyr, 0.06, 0.015, 0.06; C. krusei, 0.03, 0.06, 0.06; C. lusitaniae, 0.05, 0.25, 0.12; C. parapsilosis, 2, 0.25, 1; and C. guilliermondii, 2, 0.5. 05. The ECVs, expressed in microg/ml (percentage of isolates that had MICs that were less than or equal to the ECV is shown in parentheses) for anidulafungin, caspofungin, and micafungin, respectively, were as follows: 0.12 (99.7%), 0.12 (99.8%), and 0.03 (97.7%) for C. albicans; 0.25 (99.4%), 0.12 (98.5%), and 0.03 (98.2%) for C. glabrata; 0.12 (98.9%), 0.12 (99.4%), and 0.12 (99.1%) for C. tropicalis; 0.25(100%), 0.03 (100%), and 0.12 (100%) for C. kefyr; 0.12 (99.3%), 0.25 (96.3%), and 0.12 (97.8%) for C. krusei; 2 (100%), 0.5 (98.0%), and 0.5 (99.0%) for C. lusitaniae; 4 (100%), 1 (98.6%), and 4 (100%) for C. parapsilosis; 16 (100%), 4 (95.5%), and 4 (98.9%) for C. guilliermondii. These WT MIC distributions and ECVs will be useful in surveillance for emerging reduced echinocandin susceptibility among Candida spp. and for determining the importance of various FKS1 or other mutations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19923478      PMCID: PMC2812271          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01590-09

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  26 in total

1.  Interlaboratory comparison of results of susceptibility testing with caspofungin against Candida and Aspergillus species.

Authors:  Frank C Odds; Mary Motyl; Roberto Andrade; Jacques Bille; Emilia Cantón; Manuel Cuenca-Estrella; Amanda Davidson; Christian Durussel; David Ellis; Elyse Foraker; Annette W Fothergill; Mahmoud A Ghannoum; Robert A Giacobbe; Miguel Gobernado; Rosemary Handke; Michel Laverdière; Wendy Lee-Yang; William G Merz; Luis Ostrosky-Zeichner; Javier Pemán; Sophia Perea; John R Perfect; Michael A Pfaller; Laurie Proia; John H Rex; Michael G Rinaldi; Juan-Luis Rodriguez-Tudela; Wiley A Schell; Christine Shields; Deanna A Sutton; Paul E Verweij; David W Warnock
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Statistical characterisation of bacterial wild-type MIC value distributions and the determination of epidemiological cut-off values.

Authors:  J Turnidge; G Kahlmeter; G Kronvall
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 8.067

3.  In vitro activities of anidulafungin against more than 2,500 clinical isolates of Candida spp., including 315 isolates resistant to fluconazole.

Authors:  M A Pfaller; L Boyken; R J Hollis; S A Messer; S Tendolkar; D J Diekema
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Caspofungin susceptibility testing of isolates from patients with esophageal candidiasis or invasive candidiasis: relationship of MIC to treatment outcome.

Authors:  Nicholas Kartsonis; John Killar; Lori Mixson; Chao-Min Hoe; Carole Sable; Kenneth Bartizal; Mary Motyl
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Further standardization of broth microdilution methodology for in vitro susceptibility testing of caspofungin against Candida species by use of an international collection of more than 3,000 clinical isolates.

Authors:  M A Pfaller; S A Messer; L Boyken; C Rice; S Tendolkar; R J Hollis; D J Diekema
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Antifungal susceptibility survey of 2,000 bloodstream Candida isolates in the United States.

Authors:  Luis Ostrosky-Zeichner; John H Rex; Peter G Pappas; Richard J Hamill; Robert A Larsen; Harold W Horowitz; William G Powderly; Newton Hyslop; Carol A Kauffman; John Cleary; Julie E Mangino; Jeannette Lee
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Comparison of caspofungin and amphotericin B for invasive candidiasis.

Authors:  Jorge Mora-Duarte; Robert Betts; Coleman Rotstein; Arnaldo Lopes Colombo; Luis Thompson-Moya; Juanita Smietana; Robert Lupinacci; Carole Sable; Nicholas Kartsonis; John Perfect
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-12-19       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  In vitro susceptibilities of Candida spp. to caspofungin: four years of global surveillance.

Authors:  M A Pfaller; L Boyken; R J Hollis; S A Messer; S Tendolkar; D J Diekema
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Progressive loss of echinocandin activity following prolonged use for treatment of Candida albicans oesophagitis.

Authors:  Michel Laverdière; Richard G Lalonde; Jean-Guy Baril; Donald C Sheppard; Steven Park; David S Perlin
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2006-02-07       Impact factor: 5.790

10.  Effect of Candida glabrata FKS1 and FKS2 mutations on echinocandin sensitivity and kinetics of 1,3-beta-D-glucan synthase: implication for the existing susceptibility breakpoint.

Authors:  Guillermo Garcia-Effron; Samuel Lee; Steven Park; John D Cleary; David S Perlin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-06-22       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  69 in total

1.  Prospective multicenter study of the epidemiology, molecular identification, and antifungal susceptibility of Candida parapsilosis, Candida orthopsilosis, and Candida metapsilosis isolated from patients with candidemia.

Authors:  Emilia Cantón; Javier Pemán; Guillermo Quindós; Elena Eraso; Ilargi Miranda-Zapico; María Álvarez; Paloma Merino; Isolina Campos-Herrero; Francesc Marco; Elia Gomez G de la Pedrosa; Genoveva Yagüe; Remedios Guna; Carmen Rubio; Consuelo Miranda; Carmen Pazos; David Velasco
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Use of matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry for caspofungin susceptibility testing of Candida and Aspergillus species.

Authors:  Elena De Carolis; Antonietta Vella; Ada R Florio; Patrizia Posteraro; David S Perlin; Maurizio Sanguinetti; Brunella Posteraro
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-04-25       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3.  Progress in antifungal susceptibility testing of Candida spp. by use of Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute broth microdilution methods, 2010 to 2012.

Authors:  M A Pfaller; D J Diekema
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  In vitro activity of anidulafungin and other agents against esophageal candidiasis-associated isolates from a phase 3 clinical trial.

Authors:  M A Pfaller; R Hollis; B P Goldstein; S Messer; D Diekema; T Henkel
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-05-26       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Development of echinocandin resistance in Clavispora lusitaniae during caspofungin treatment.

Authors:  Marie Desnos-Ollivier; Olivier Moquet; Taieb Chouaki; Anne-Marie Guérin; Françoise Dromer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Interlaboratory variability of Caspofungin MICs for Candida spp. Using CLSI and EUCAST methods: should the clinical laboratory be testing this agent?

Authors:  A Espinel-Ingroff; M C Arendrup; M A Pfaller; L X Bonfietti; B Bustamante; E Canton; E Chryssanthou; M Cuenca-Estrella; E Dannaoui; A Fothergill; J Fuller; P Gaustad; G M Gonzalez; J Guarro; C Lass-Flörl; S R Lockhart; J F Meis; C B Moore; L Ostrosky-Zeichner; T Pelaez; S R B S Pukinskas; G St-Germain; M W Szeszs; J Turnidge
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Use of anidulafungin as a surrogate marker to predict susceptibility and resistance to caspofungin among 4,290 clinical isolates of Candida by using CLSI methods and interpretive criteria.

Authors:  Michael A Pfaller; Daniel J Diekema; Ronald N Jones; Mariana Castanheira
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Comparison of the broth microdilution (BMD) method of the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing with the 24-hour CLSI BMD method for testing susceptibility of Candida species to fluconazole, posaconazole, and voriconazole by use of epidemiological cutoff values.

Authors:  M A Pfaller; A Espinel-Ingroff; L Boyken; R J Hollis; J Kroeger; S A Messer; S Tendolkar; D J Diekema
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Hot topics in antifungal susceptibility testing: A new drug, a bad bug, sweeping caspofungin testing under the rug, and solving the ECV shrug.

Authors:  Shawn R Lockhart; Elizabeth L Berkow
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Newsl       Date:  2016-07

10.  CRS-MIS in Candida glabrata: sphingolipids modulate echinocandin-Fks interaction.

Authors:  Kelley R Healey; Santosh K Katiyar; Shriya Raj; Thomas D Edlind
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 3.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.