| Literature DB >> 27047463 |
Priyanka Sharma1, Mohan C Kalita2, Debajit Thakur1.
Abstract
A mesophilic actinomycete strain designated as PB-52 was isolated from soil samples of Pobitora Wildlife Sanctuary of Assam, India. Based on phenotypic and molecular characteristics, the strain was identified as Nocardia sp. which shares 99.7% sequence similarity with Nocardia niigatensis IFM 0330 (NR_112195). The strain is a Gram-positive filamentous bacterium with rugose spore surface which exhibited a wide range of antimicrobial activity against Gram-positive bacteria including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Gram-negative bacteria, and yeasts. Optimization for the growth and antimicrobial activity of the strain PB-52 was carried out in batch culture under shaking condition. The optimum growth and antimicrobial potential of the strain were recorded in GLM medium at 28°C, initial pH 7.4 of the medium and incubation period of 8 days. Based on polyketide synthases (PKS) and non-ribosomal peptide synthetases (NRPS) gene-targeted PCR amplification, the occurrence of both of these biosynthetic pathways was detected which might be involved in the production of antimicrobial compounds in PB-52. Extract of the fermented broth culture of PB-52 was prepared with organic solvent extraction method using ethyl acetate. The ethyl acetate extract of PB-52 (EA-PB-52) showed lowest minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) against S. aureus MTCC 96 (0.975 μg/mL) whereas highest was recorded against Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC 13883 (62.5 μg/mL). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) revealed that treatment of the test microorganisms with EA-PB-52 destroyed the targeted cells with prominent loss of cell shape and integrity. In order to determine the constituents responsible for its antimicrobial activity, EA-PB-52 was subjected to chemical analysis using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). GC-MS analysis showed the presence of twelve different chemical constituents in the extract, some of which are reported to possess diverse biological activity. These results confirmed that the presence of bioactive constituents in EA-PB-52 could be a promising source for the development of potent antimicrobial agents effective against wide range of microbial pathogens including MRSA.Entities:
Keywords: GC-MS; Nocardia sp.; SEM; antimicrobial activity; biosynthetic genes; culturing conditions; microbial pathogens
Year: 2016 PMID: 27047463 PMCID: PMC4796592 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00347
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Figure 1Microscopic view showing spore chain of .
Cultural characteristics of .
| Actinomycetes isolation agar | Brown | Dark brown | − | +++ |
| Streptomyces agar | Light orange | Orange | − | ++ |
| GLM medium | Orange | Light brown | Faint Brown | +++ |
| CSPY-ME medium | Pink | Brown | − | +++ |
| Mueller Hinton Agar | Light brown | Brown | − | + |
| Nutrient agar | White | Cream | − | ++ |
| Sabouraud Dextrose Agar | Orange | Cream | − | ++ |
| Thronton's medium | Orange | Brown | − | ++ |
| Omeliansky's agar | White | Brown | − | + |
| ISP 2 | Pink | Orange | − | +++ |
| ISP 3 | White | Brown | − | ++ |
| ISP 4 | White | Cream | − | +++ |
| ISP 7 | Orange | Cream | − | ++ |
+++, Good growth; ++, Moderate growth; +, Poor growth; −, No growth.
Morphological, physiological, and biochemical characteristics of .
| Aerial mycelium color | Orange |
| Substrate mycelium color | Brown |
| Diffusible pigment | Faint brown |
| Melanin pigment | – |
| Spore chain morphology | Straight to rectiflexibiles |
| Spore surface | Rugose |
| Temperature range for growth | 20–42°C |
| Optimum temperature for growth | 28°C |
| pH range for growth | 5–11 |
| Optimum pH for growth | 7.4 |
| NaCl tolerance | Up to 5% |
| Gram reaction | Positive |
| Utilization of | |
| Glucose | + |
| Fructose | + |
| Arabinose | − |
| Mannitol | + |
| Inositol | + |
| Adonitol | + |
| Galactose | − |
| Sucrose | + |
| Xylose | + |
| Lactose | + |
| Maltose | + |
| Starch | + |
| Glycerol | + |
| Erythritol | − |
| Sorbitol | − |
| Rhamnose | − |
| Gluconate | − |
| Carboxy methyl cellulose | + |
| Citrate | − |
| Urea | + |
| Ammonium chloride | + |
| Ammonium sulfhate | + |
| Sodium nitrate | + |
| Glycine | + |
| Asparagine | + |
| Casein | − |
| Tween 20 | − |
| Tween 80 | + |
| Nitrate reduction | + |
| Gelatin liquefaction | − |
| Cell wall amino acids | Meso-diaminopimelic acid |
| Cell wall sugars | Arabinose, galactose |
| Vancomycin (30) | S |
| Chloramphenicol (30) | S |
| Oxacillin (1) | R |
| Ciprofloxacin (5) | S |
| Co-trimoxazole (25) | R |
| Streptomycin (10) | S |
| Methicillin (5) | S |
| Ampicillin (10) | R |
| Penicillin-G (10) | S |
| Gentamicin (120) | R |
| Nalidixic acid (30) | S |
| Erythromycin (5) | S |
| Norfloxacin (10) | S |
| Amphotericin B (100) | R |
| Clotrimazole (10) | S |
| Fluconazole (25) | R |
| Itraconazole (10) | R |
| Ketoconazole (10) | S |
| Nystatin (100) | R |
+, Positive for test; −, Negative for test; S for Sensitivity; R for Resistant.
Figure 2Phylogenetic tree of . Bootstrap percentages based on 1000 resamplings are listed at nodes, only values above 50% are given. Bar, 0.005 substitutions per nucleotide position.
Antimicrobial activity and MIC (μg/mL) of .
| 36k±0.8 | >0.975 | >1.95 | >6.25 | NA | |
| 29hij±0.8 | >1.95 | >1.95 | >12.5 | NA | |
| 23de±1.6 | >7.81 | >3.125 | >6.25 | NA | |
| 28ghi±0.8 | >1.95 | >1.95 | >6.25 | NA | |
| 22d±0.4 | >7.81 | >6.25 | >12.5 | NA | |
| 26fg±0.4 | >3.9 | >3.12 | >3.12 | NA | |
| 22d±1.6 | >7.81 | >0.97 | >6.25 | NA | |
| MRSA ATCC 43300 | 30ij±0.8 | >1.95 | >25 | >50 | NA |
| 31j±1.2 | >3.9 | >6.25 | >3.12 | NA | |
| 25ef±0.4 | >3.9 | >50 | − | NA | |
| 18b±1.2 | >31.2 | >12.5 | >3.12 | NA | |
| 27fgh±1.6 | >1.95 | >25 | − | NA | |
| 15a±1.6 | >62.5 | >50 | − | NA | |
| 29hij±0.8 | >1.95 | >25 | >25 | NA | |
| 19bc±1.2 | >15.6 | − | >12.5 | NA | |
| 26fg±0.8 | >3.9 | >50 | >25 | NA | |
| 17a±0.8 | >31.25 | >25 | >6.25 | NA | |
| 27fgh±0.4 | >1.95 | NA | NA | >0.97 | |
| 23de±0.2 | >7.81 | NA | NA | >0.48 | |
| 21cd±1.6 | >7.81 | NA | NA | >1.95 | |
Zone of inhibition by spot inoculation method on GLM agar medium. Average size of colony of PB-52 in GLM agar was (7 ± 2) mm in diameter after 8 days of incubation at 28°C.
Zone of inhibition values are given as mean ± SD (n = 3). Values having different superscripts (a-k) differ significantly (P < 0.05).
Rif, Rifampicin (antibacterial agent); Strep, Streptomycin (antibacterial agent); Amp B, Amphotericin B (antifungal agent); NA, not applicable; −, No activity.
Figure 3Effect of different culture media on growth and antimicrobial activity assessed in terms of diameter of inhibition zone by .
Figure 4.
Figure 5Effect of temperature on growth and antimicrobial activity assessed in terms of diameter of inhibition zone by .
Figure 6Effect of pH on growth and antimicrobial activity assessed in terms of diameter of inhibition zone by .
Figure 7Effect of incubation period on growth and antimicrobial activity assessed in terms of diameter of inhibition zone by .
Figure 8Agarose gel electrophoresis of PCR amplified products of .
.
| 2.452 | 2.772 | 4.330 | 2.456 | 0.947 | 0.342 | 2.468 | –0.157 | –2.092 | |
| 2.510 | 3.245 | 3.998 | 2.487 | 1.263 | 0.582 | 2.433 | 0.422 | –1.775 | |
| 2.853 | 3.421 | 4.227 | 2.610 | 1.512 | 0.539 | 2.717 | 0.531 | –1.717 | |
| 2.329 | 3.022 | 4.172 | 2.311 | 1.235 | 0.492 | 2.352 | 0.544 | –1.842 | |
| 2.115 | 2.914 | 4.013 | 2.302 | 1.429 | 0.483 | 2.196 | 0.436 | –1.741 | |
| 2.277 | 3.510 | 4.734 | 2.256 | 1.197 | 0.548 | 2.290 | 0.282 | –1.869 | |
| 2.314 | 3.219 | 3.816 | 2.334 | 1.315 | 0.513 | 2.105 | 0.587 | –1.512 | |
| MRSA ATCC 43300 | 2.412 | 2.868 | 3.797 | 2.249 | 1.206 | 0.429 | 2.270 | 0.124 | –1.908 |
| 2.212 | 2.842 | 3.714 | 2.368 | 1.191 | 0.404 | 2.292 | –0.112 | –1.917 | |
| 2.401 | 3.124 | 3.874 | 2.427 | 1.374 | 0.473 | 2.218 | 0.677 | –1.880 | |
| 2.316 | 2.997 | 4.512 | 2.212 | 1.529 | 0.597 | 2.307 | 0.528 | –1.563 | |
| 2.312 | 3.046 | 4.147 | 2.299 | 1.434 | 0.501 | 2.333 | 0.648 | –1.693 | |
| 2.216 | 3.934 | 4.729 | 2.137 | 1.897 | 0.864 | 2.296 | 0.891 | –1.213 | |
| 2.142 | 3.013 | 3.976 | 2.312 | 1.463 | 0.413 | 2.133 | 0.432 | –1.436 | |
| 2.314 | 3.814 | 5.214 | 2.367 | 1.545 | 0.456 | 2.121 | 0.612 | –1.517 | |
| 2.202 | 2.889 | 4.318 | 2.311 | 1.385 | 0.567 | 2.273 | 0.418 | –1.493 | |
| 2.013 | 3.214 | 4.813 | 2.213 | 1.662 | 0.727 | 2.115 | 0.723 | –1.325 | |
| 2.104 | 3.116 | 3.937 | 2.204 | 1.229 | 0.435 | 2.316 | 0.499 | –1.865 | |
| 2.049 | 3.313 | 4.712 | 2.014 | 1.575 | 0.541 | 2.179 | 0.583 | –1.630 | |
| 2.098 | 3.236 | 4.213 | 2.212 | 1.305 | 0.512 | 2.513 | 0.513 | –1.518 | |
Figure 9Scanning electron micrograph showing the effect of 1 × MIC EA-PB-52 against .
Chemical compounds detected in EA-PB-52 by GC-MS analysis.
| (Z)-3-tridecene | 95 | 18.27 | 182 | 5.14 | Hydrocarbon | No activity reported | |
| 3,5-bis (1,1-dimethylethyl)-phenol | 91 | 19.93 | 206 | 34.43 | Phenolic compound | No activity reported | |
| (Z)-3-tetradecene | 95 | 20.94 | 196 | 7.90 | Hydrocarbon | Antimicrobial | Natarajan and Dhas, |
| Dodecyl acrylate | 96 | 22.13 | 240 | 6.01 | Ester | Antibacterial | Manilal et al., |
| 2,4-di-t-butyl-6-nitrophenol | 63 | 22.22 | 251 | 4.32 | Phenolic compound | Antimicrobial | Gutierrez et al., |
| Hexahydro-pyrrolo[1,2-a]pyrazine-1,4-dione | 90 | 23.11 | 154 | 5.03 | Pyrrolizidine | Antimicrobial Antioxidant | Narasaiah et al., |
| (E)-5-Eicosene | 95 | 23.32 | 280 | 5.07 | Hydrocarbon | Antimicrobial | Elavarasi et al., |
| 3,5-dihydroxy-4,4-dimethyl-2,5-cyclohexadien-1-one | 81 | 24.08 | 154 | 3.60 | Quinone | No activity reported | |
| Hexahydro-3-(2-methylpropyl)-pyrrolo[1,2-a]pyrazine-1,4-dione | 89 | 25.11, 25.17 | 210 | 9.04 | Pyrrolizidine | Antimicrobial | Manimaran et al., |
| (E)-9-Octadecene | 94 | 25.47 | 252 | 2.21 | Hydrocarbon | Antimicrobial | Cao et al., |
| Trichloroacetic acid, hexadecyl ester | 87 | 27.42 | 387 | 1.03 | Acid | Cytotoxic, Antioxidant | Luo et al., |
| Hexahydro-3-(phenylmethyl)-pyrrolo[1,2-a]pyrazine-1,4-dione | 82 | 29.08 | 244 | 16.22 | Pyrrolizidine | Antimicrobial, Nematicidal | Dashti et al., |
RT is retention time; MW is molecular weight of compounds.
Figure 10Chemical structures of the identified compounds from EA-PB-52.