Literature DB >> 27046872

Analysis of Coherent and Diffuse Scattering Using a Reference Phantom.

Ivan M Rosado-Mendez, Lindsey C Drehfal, James A Zagzebski, Timothy J Hall.   

Abstract

The estimation of many spectral-based quantitative ultrasound parameters assumes that backscattered echo signals are from a stationary, incoherent scattering process. The accuracy of these assumptions in real tissue can limit the diagnostic value of these parameters and the physical insight about tissue microstructure they can convey. This work presents an empirical decision test to determine the presence of significant coherent contributions to echo signals and whether they are caused by low scatterer number densities or the presence of specular reflectors or scatterers with periodic spacing. This is achieved by computing parameters from echo signals that quantify stationary or nonstationary features related to coherent scattering, and then comparing their values to thresholds determined from a reference material providing diffuse scattering. The paper first presents a number of parameters with demonstrated sensitivity to coherent scattering and describes criteria to select those with the highest sensitivity using simulated and phantom-based echo data. Results showed that the echo amplitude signal-to-noise ratio and the multitaper-generalized spectrum were the parameters with the highest sensitivity to coherent scattering with stationary and nonstationary features, respectively. These parameters were incorporated into the reference-based decision test, which successfully identified regions in simulated and tissue-mimicking phantoms with different incoherent and coherent scattering conditions. When scatterers with periodic organization were detected, the combination of stationary and nonstationary analysis permitted the estimation of the mean spacing below and above the resolution limit imposed by the pulse size. Preliminary applications of this algorithm to human cervical tissue ex vivo showed correspondence between regions of B-mode images showing bright reflectors, tissue interfaces, and hypoechoic regions with regions classified as specular reflectors and low scatterer number density. These results encourage further application of the algorithm to more structurally complex phantoms and tissue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27046872      PMCID: PMC5033677          DOI: 10.1109/TUFFC.2016.2547341

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control        ISSN: 0885-3010            Impact factor:   2.725


  62 in total

1.  Ultrasonic tissue characterization using a generalized Nakagami model.

Authors:  P M Shankar
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.725

2.  Tissue characterization using the continuous wavelet transform. Part I: Decomposition method.

Authors:  G Georgiou; F S Cohen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.725

3.  Defining optimal axial and lateral resolution for estimating scatterer properties from volumes using ultrasound backscatter.

Authors:  Michael L Oelze; William D O'Brien
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  The effect of transducer characteristics on the estimation of Nakagami paramater as a function of scatterer concentration.

Authors:  Po-Hsiang Tsui; Shyh-Hau Wang
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.998

5.  An ultrasound research interface for a clinical system.

Authors:  Mohammad Ashfaq; Shelby S Brunke; Jeremy J Dahl; Helmut Ermert; Christian Hansen; Michael F Insana
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.725

6.  Statistical characterization of diffuse scattering in ultrasound images.

Authors:  G Georgiou; F S Cohen
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.725

7.  Studies on the use of non-Rayleigh statistics for ultrasonic tissue characterization.

Authors:  P M Shankar; R Molthen; V M Narayanan; J M Reid; V Genis; F Forsberg; C W Piccoli; A E Lindenmayer; B B Goldberg
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.998

8.  ESTIMATION METHOD OF THE HOMODYNED K-DISTRIBUTION BASED ON THE MEAN INTENSITY AND TWO LOG-MOMENTS.

Authors:  François Destrempes; Jonathan Porée; Guy Cloutier
Journal:  SIAM J Imaging Sci       Date:  2013-08-23       Impact factor: 2.867

9.  Quantitative ultrasound imaging: in vivo results in normal liver.

Authors:  J A Zagzebski; Z F Lu; L X Yao
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 1.578

10.  Scatterer number density considerations in reference phantom-based attenuation estimation.

Authors:  Nicholas Rubert; Tomy Varghese
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 2.998

View more
  9 in total

1.  Cervical Evaluation: From Ancient Medicine to Precision Medicine.

Authors:  Helen Feltovich
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Assessment of Structural Heterogeneity and Viscosity in the Cervix Using Shear Wave Elasticity Imaging: Initial Results from a Rhesus Macaque Model.

Authors:  Ivan M Rosado-Mendez; Mark L Palmeri; Lindsey C Drehfal; Quinton W Guerrero; Heather Simmons; Helen Feltovich; Timothy J Hall
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  Shapes and distributions of soft tissue scatterers.

Authors:  K J Parker
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Platform for quantitative multiscale imaging of tissue composition.

Authors:  Michael A Pinkert; Zachary J Simmons; Ryan C Niemeier; Bing Dai; Lauren B Woods; Timothy J Hall; Paul J Campagnola; Jeremy D Rogers; Kevin W Eliceiri
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 3.732

5.  A Quantitative Ultrasound-Based Multi-Parameter Classifier for Breast Masses.

Authors:  Haidy G Nasief; Ivan M Rosado-Mendez; James A Zagzebski; Timothy J Hall
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 2.998

6.  Quantifying Backscatter Anisotropy Using the Reference Phantom Method.

Authors:  Quinton W Guerrero; Ivan M Rosado-Mendez; Lindsey C Drehfal; Helen Feltovich; Timothy J Hall
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 2.725

Review 7.  Review of quantitative multiscale imaging of breast cancer.

Authors:  Michael A Pinkert; Lonie R Salkowski; Patricia J Keely; Timothy J Hall; Walter F Block; Kevin W Eliceiri
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2018-01-22

8.  Correlation length ratio as a parameter for determination of fiber-like structures in soft tissues.

Authors:  M Kari; H Feltovich; T J Hall
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-02-24       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  High throughput nonparametric probability density estimation.

Authors:  Jenny Farmer; Donald Jacobs
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.