Literature DB >> 2704582

Immunoreactive trypsinogen screening for cystic fibrosis: characterization of infants with a false-positive screening test.

M J Rock1, E H Mischler, P M Farrell, W T Bruns, D J Hassemer, R H Laessig.   

Abstract

Blood immunoreactive trypsinogen (IRT) is elevated in newborns with cystic fibrosis (CF) and has been used as a neonatal screening test. However, not only is the benefit of early diagnosis unknown, but also the sensitivity, specificity, and time related decline of IRT values have yet to be comprehensively evaluated. This report describes the characteristics of infants with a false-positive IRT in our experience with CF screening of 87,000 infants. The IRT value was elevated in 92 newborns; 13 had a confirmed diagnosis of CF by quantitative pilocarpine iontophoresis sweat testing, and 79 infants did not have CF and were therefore classified as false positives by IRT screening. In order to test the hypothesis that perinatal stress factors are associated with high neonatal IRT values, we evaluated Apgar scores at 1 and 5 minutes. We found that the scores of false-positive infants were significantly lower (P = 0.0004 and P = 0.0102 at 1 and 5 minutes, respectively), compared with infants in the general population. While perinatal asphyxia as reflected by low Apgar scores is an associated factor accounting for an elevated IRT value, the majority of non-CF newborns with an elevated IRT have normal Apgar scores.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2704582     DOI: 10.1002/ppul.1950060111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Pulmonol        ISSN: 1099-0496


  13 in total

1.  Protracted neonatal hypertrypsinogenaemia, normal sweat chloride, and cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  C Castellani; A Tamanini; G Mastella
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  False-positive results in neonatal screening for cystic fibrosis based on a three-stage protocol (IRT/DNA/IRT): Should we adjust IRT cut-off to ethnic origin?

Authors:  D Cheillan; M Vercherat; F Chevalier-Porst; M Charcosset; M O Rolland; C Dorche
Journal:  J Inherit Metab Dis       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.982

3.  Extra corporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) therapy in a 3-year-old child with cystic fibrosis: a tale of hope.

Authors:  Patrick Stafler; Colin Wallis
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Non-specific elevation of immunoreactive trypsinogen in sick infants.

Authors:  D Ravine; R I Francis; D M Danks
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 3.183

5.  Markedly elevated neonatal immunoreactive trypsinogen levels in the absence of cystic fibrosis gene mutations is not an indication for further testing.

Authors:  J Massie; L Curnow; N Tzanakos; I Francis; C F Robertson
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2005-10-21       Impact factor: 3.791

Review 6.  Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  Jack K Sharp; Michael J Rock
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 8.667

7.  Neonatal screening for cystic fibrosis using immunoreactive trypsinogen and direct gene analysis: four years' experience.

Authors:  E Ranieri; B D Lewis; R L Gerace; R G Ryall; C P Morris; P V Nelson; W F Carey; E F Robertson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-06-04

Review 8.  Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis: a lesson in public health disparities.

Authors:  Lainie Friedman Ross
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.406

9.  Screening for cystic fibrosis in New York State: considerations for algorithm improvements.

Authors:  Denise M Kay; Breanne Maloney; Rhonda Hamel; Melissa Pearce; Lenore DeMartino; Rebecca McMahon; Emily McGrath; Lea Krein; Beth Vogel; Carlos A Saavedra-Matiz; Michele Caggana; Norma P Tavakoli
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 3.183

10.  Cystic fibrosis newborn screening programs: implications of the CFTR variant spectrum in nonwhite patients.

Authors:  Lynn Pique; Steve Graham; Michelle Pearl; Martin Kharrazi; Iris Schrijver
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 8.822

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.