Literature DB >> 16243854

Markedly elevated neonatal immunoreactive trypsinogen levels in the absence of cystic fibrosis gene mutations is not an indication for further testing.

J Massie1, L Curnow, N Tzanakos, I Francis, C F Robertson.   

Abstract

AIMS: To investigate the immunoreactive trypsinogen (IRT) values above the usual 99th centile laboratory cut-off and determine the value of offering further testing to those infants with a markedly elevated IRT but no cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator (CFTR) gene mutation identified by the screening programme.
METHODS: All babies born in Victoria, Australia, between 1991 and 2003, were screened by IRT followed by CF gene mutation analysis.
RESULTS: Of the 806,520 babies born, 9268 with the highest IRT levels had CFTR mutation analysis. There were 123 DeltaF508 homozygotes and 703 heterozygotes (86 with CF, 617 carriers). A total of 8442 babies had no CFTR gene mutation, of whom 18 (0.21%) had CF. The total number of CF babies with IRT greater than the laboratory cut-off was 227 (2.4%). The IRT results of the CF patients were distributed normally, with the majority above the laboratory cut-off of newborn IRT results. There was no evidence of an excess of babies with CF in the very highest levels of IRT above the 99th centile.
CONCLUSIONS: Only a small proportion of babies with a neonatal IRT >99th centile have CF. Additional CF testing for infants with an elevated IRT but no CFTR gene mutation has an extremely low yield, no matter how high the IRT result.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16243854      PMCID: PMC2065933          DOI: 10.1136/adc.2005.081349

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dis Child        ISSN: 0003-9888            Impact factor:   3.791


  8 in total

1.  Immunoreactive trypsinogen screening for cystic fibrosis: characterization of infants with a false-positive screening test.

Authors:  M J Rock; E H Mischler; P M Farrell; W T Bruns; D J Hassemer; R H Laessig
Journal:  Pediatr Pulmonol       Date:  1989

Review 2.  Screening, early neonatal diagnosis and prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  J A Kuzemko
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Dried-blood spot screening for cystic fibrosis in the newborn.

Authors:  J R Crossley; R B Elliott; P A Smith
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1979-03-03       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis in Wisconsin: comparison of biochemical and molecular methods.

Authors:  R G Gregg; A Simantel; P M Farrell; R Koscik; M R Kosorok; A Laxova; R Laessig; G Hoffman; D Hassemer; E H Mischler; M Splaingard
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis in Victoria: 10 years' experience (1989-1998).

Authors:  R J Massie; M Olsen; J Glazner; C F Robertson; I Francis
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2000-06-19       Impact factor: 7.738

6.  Neonatal screening for cystic fibrosis using immunoreactive trypsinogen and direct gene analysis: four years' experience.

Authors:  E Ranieri; B D Lewis; R L Gerace; R G Ryall; C P Morris; P V Nelson; W F Carey; E F Robertson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-06-04

7.  Cystic fibrosis screening in neonates--measurement of immunoreactive trypsin and direct genotype analysis for delta F508 mutation.

Authors:  J Larsen; S Campbell; E B Faragher; M Götz; I Eichler; S Waldherr; K Dobianer; J Spona
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 3.183

8.  The impact of newborn screening on cystic fibrosis testing in Victoria, Australia.

Authors:  M E Balnaves; L Bonacquisto; I Francis; J Glazner; S Forrest
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 6.318

  8 in total
  5 in total

Review 1.  Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis: do we need a second IRT?

Authors:  J F Price
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  Positive Newborn Screening for Cystic Fibrosis, What to Do Next?

Authors:  Prawin Kumar; Jagdish Prasad Goyal
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2019-07-19       Impact factor: 1.967

3.  National Newborn Screening for cystic fibrosis in the Republic of Ireland: genetic data from the first 6.5 years.

Authors:  Erina Sasaki; Marija Kostocenko; Niamh Lang; Tara Clark; Melissa Rogers; Rebecca Muldowney; Olivia Walsh; Loretta O'Grady; Gillian Edge; Alana Ward; Barry Linnane; Ingrid Borovickova; David E Barton; Sally Ann Lynch
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 4.246

4.  Screening for cystic fibrosis in New York State: considerations for algorithm improvements.

Authors:  Denise M Kay; Breanne Maloney; Rhonda Hamel; Melissa Pearce; Lenore DeMartino; Rebecca McMahon; Emily McGrath; Lea Krein; Beth Vogel; Carlos A Saavedra-Matiz; Michele Caggana; Norma P Tavakoli
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 3.183

5.  The Incidence of Cystic Fibrosis in the Central Region of Anatolia in Turkey Between 2015 and 2016

Authors:  Melih Hangül; Sevgi Pekcan; Mehmet Köse; Deniz Acıcan; Tuba Esra Şahlar; Murat Erdoğan; Mustafa Kendirci; Deniz Güney; Hasan Öznavruz; Osman Demir; Ömür Ercan; Fatma Göçlü
Journal:  Balkan Med J       Date:  2018-12-28       Impact factor: 2.021

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.