BACKGROUND: Policies and protocols vary widely for fetal surveillance in a pregnancy where the fetus is suspected to be large-for-gestational-age (LGA). All ultimately culminate in decisions about the mode and timing of birth. LGA is known to be associated with increased risks to both the mother and baby. Interventions based on surveillance regimen findings may be associated with risks to the mother and baby. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness or efficacy of different antenatal surveillance methods for the suspected LGA fetus on important health outcomes for the mother and baby. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (30 August 2015), ClinicalTrials.gov and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (21 August 2015). SELECTION CRITERIA: Published and unpublished randomised, quasi-randomised and cluster-randomised trials comparing the effects of described antenatal fetal surveillance regimens for women with suspected LGA infants. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We identified no studies that met the inclusion criteria for this review. MAIN RESULTS: There are no included trials. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We found no randomised controlled trials that assessed the effect of antenatal fetal surveillance regimens of a suspected LGA fetus on important health outcomes for the mother and baby.There has been a rise in the prevalence of LGA babies over the past few decades in many countries. Research is therefore required on regimens of antenatal surveillance of suspected LGA infants, in order to guide practice and improve the health outcomes for the mother and infant. In particular, randomised control trials to investigate whether serial antenatal clinic and ultrasound assessments of suspected LGA infants (including liquor volume and markers of fetal adiposity) would be useful, to assess whether surveillance methods improve health outcomes. In addition, as there are concerns that identifying suspected LGA fetuses may lead to unnecessary maternal anxiety, investigations and interventions, any such trial would need to assess the risks as well as benefits of regimens of fetal surveillance for suspected LGA fetuses.
BACKGROUND: Policies and protocols vary widely for fetal surveillance in a pregnancy where the fetus is suspected to be large-for-gestational-age (LGA). All ultimately culminate in decisions about the mode and timing of birth. LGA is known to be associated with increased risks to both the mother and baby. Interventions based on surveillance regimen findings may be associated with risks to the mother and baby. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness or efficacy of different antenatal surveillance methods for the suspected LGA fetus on important health outcomes for the mother and baby. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (30 August 2015), ClinicalTrials.gov and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (21 August 2015). SELECTION CRITERIA: Published and unpublished randomised, quasi-randomised and cluster-randomised trials comparing the effects of described antenatal fetal surveillance regimens for women with suspected LGA infants. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We identified no studies that met the inclusion criteria for this review. MAIN RESULTS: There are no included trials. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We found no randomised controlled trials that assessed the effect of antenatal fetal surveillance regimens of a suspected LGA fetus on important health outcomes for the mother and baby.There has been a rise in the prevalence of LGA babies over the past few decades in many countries. Research is therefore required on regimens of antenatal surveillance of suspected LGA infants, in order to guide practice and improve the health outcomes for the mother and infant. In particular, randomised control trials to investigate whether serial antenatal clinic and ultrasound assessments of suspected LGA infants (including liquor volume and markers of fetal adiposity) would be useful, to assess whether surveillance methods improve health outcomes. In addition, as there are concerns that identifying suspected LGA fetuses may lead to unnecessary maternal anxiety, investigations and interventions, any such trial would need to assess the risks as well as benefits of regimens of fetal surveillance for suspected LGA fetuses.
Authors: Suneet P Chauhan; William A Grobman; Robert A Gherman; Vidya B Chauhan; Gene Chang; Everett F Magann; Nancy W Hendrix Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Ai Koyanagi; Jun Zhang; Amarjargal Dagvadorj; Fumi Hirayama; Kenji Shibuya; João Paulo Souza; Ahmet Metin Gülmezoglu Journal: Lancet Date: 2013-01-04 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: D Sadeh-Mestechkin; A Walfisch; R Shachar; I Shoham-Vardi; H Vardi; M Hallak Journal: Arch Gynecol Obstet Date: 2008-02-26 Impact factor: 2.344
Authors: Gordon Cs Smith; Alexandros A Moraitis; David Wastlund; Jim G Thornton; Aris Papageorghiou; Julia Sanders; Alexander Ep Heazell; Stephen C Robson; Ulla Sovio; Peter Brocklehurst; Edward Cf Wilson Journal: Health Technol Assess Date: 2021-02 Impact factor: 4.014
Authors: D Wastlund; A A Moraitis; J G Thornton; J Sanders; I R White; P Brocklehurst; Gcs Smith; Ecf Wilson Journal: BJOG Date: 2019-06-05 Impact factor: 6.531
Authors: Jorge Ivan Martinez; Marcelo Isidro Figueroa; José Miguel Martínez-Carrión; Emma Laura Alfaro-Gomez; José Edgardo Dipierri Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-01-06 Impact factor: 3.390