Literature DB >> 16098852

Suspicion and treatment of the macrosomic fetus: a review.

Suneet P Chauhan1, William A Grobman, Robert A Gherman, Vidya B Chauhan, Gene Chang, Everett F Magann, Nancy W Hendrix.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To review the prevalence of and our ability to identify macrosomic (birthweight >4000 g) fetuses. Additionally, based on the current evidence, propose an algorithm for treatment of suspected macrosomia. STUDY
DESIGN: A review.
RESULTS: According to the National Vital Statistics, in the United States, the prevalence of newborns weighing at least 4000 g has decreased by 10% in seven years (10.2% in 1996 and 9.2% in 2002) and 19% for newborns with weights >5000 g (0.16% and 0.13%, respectively). Bayesian calculations indicates that the posttest probability of detecting a macrosomic fetus in an uncomplicated pregnancy is variable, ranging from 15% to 79% with sonographic estimates of birth weight, and 40 to 52% with clinical estimates. Among diabetic patients the post-test probability of identifying a newborn weighing >4000 g clinically and sonographically is over 60%. Among uncomplicated pregnancies, there is sufficient evidence that suspected macrosomia is not an indication for induction or for primary cesarean delivery. For pregnancies complicated by diabetes, with a prior cesarean delivery or shoulder dystocia, delivery of a macrosomic fetus increases the rate of complications, but there is insufficient evidence about the threshold of estimated fetal weight that should prompt cesarean delivery.
CONCLUSION: Due to the inaccuracies, among uncomplicated pregnancies suspicion of macrosomia is not an indication for induction or for primary cesarean delivery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16098852     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.12.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  32 in total

1.  Position paper: promoting, supporting, and protecting normal birth.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2007

2.  Induction of Labour: Change of Method and its Effects.

Authors:  S Kehl; C Weiss; U Dammer; E Raabe; S Burghaus; J Heimrich; J Hackl; M Winkler; M W Beckmann; F Faschingbauer
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.915

3.  Genetic risk score for prediction of newborn adiposity and large-for-gestational-age birth.

Authors:  Reeti Chawla; Sylvia E Badon; Janani Rangarajan; Anna C Reisetter; Loren L Armstrong; Lynn P Lowe; Margrit Urbanek; Boyd E Metzger; M Geoffrey Hayes; Denise M Scholtens; William L Lowe
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 4.  Diabetes in pregnancy: timing and mode of delivery.

Authors:  Gianpaolo Maso; Monica Piccoli; Sara Parolin; Stefano Restaino; Salvatore Alberico
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 4.810

5.  Accuracy of Fetal Weight Estimation in Women with Diet Controlled Gestational Diabetes.

Authors:  H Husslein; C Worda; H Leipold; Stefan Szalay
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.915

6.  Risk Factors for Macrosomia.

Authors:  Elie Nkwabong; Guilherme Roger Nzalli Tangho
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2014-07-05

7.  Excess Maternal Weight Gain and Large for Gestational Age Risk among Women with Gestational Diabetes.

Authors:  Erica K Berggren; Alison M Stuebe; Kim A Boggess
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 1.862

8.  Percentage change in antenatal body mass index as a predictor of neonatal macrosomia.

Authors:  Chad A Asplund; Dean A Seehusen; Terra L Callahan; Cara Olsen
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.166

9.  Labor and Delivery Experiences of Mothers with Suspected Large Babies.

Authors:  Erika R Cheng; Eugene R Declercq; Candice Belanoff; Naomi E Stotland; Ronald E Iverson
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2015-12

Review 10.  Regimens of fetal surveillance of suspected large-for-gestational-age fetuses for improving health outcomes.

Authors:  Katherine A T Culliney; Graham K Parry; Julie Brown; Caroline A Crowther
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-04-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.