Literature DB >> 27044938

Phase I Study of LY2606368, a Checkpoint Kinase 1 Inhibitor, in Patients With Advanced Cancer.

David Hong1, Jeffrey Infante2, Filip Janku2, Suzanne Jones2, Ly M Nguyen2, Howard Burris2, Aung Naing2, Todd M Bauer2, Sarina Piha-Paul2, Faye M Johnson2, Razelle Kurzrock2, Lisa Golden2, Scott Hynes2, Ji Lin2, Aimee Bence Lin2, Johanna Bendell2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The primary objective was to determine safety, toxicity, and a recommended phase II dose regimen of LY2606368, an inhibitor of checkpoint kinase 1, as monotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This phase I, nonrandomized, open-label, dose-escalation trial used a 3 + 3 dose-escalation scheme and included patients with advanced solid tumors. Intravenous LY2606368 was dose escalated from 10 to 50 mg/m(2) on schedule 1 (days 1 to 3 every 14 days) or from 40 to 130 mg/m(2) on schedule 2 (day 1 every 14 days). Safety measures and pharmacokinetics were assessed, and pharmacodynamics were measured in blood, hair follicles, and circulating tumor cells.
RESULTS: Forty-five patients were treated; seven experienced dose-limiting toxicities (all hematologic). The maximum-tolerated doses (MTDs) were 40 mg/m(2) (schedule 1) and 105 mg/m(2) (schedule 2). The most common related grade 3 or 4 treatment-emergent adverse events were neutropenia, leukopenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia, and fatigue. Grade 4 neutropenia occurred in 73.3% of patients and was transient (typically < 5 days). Febrile neutropenia incidence was low (7%). The LY2606368 exposure over the first 72 hours (area under the curve from 0 to 72 hours) at the MTD for each schedule coincided with the exposure in mouse xenografts that resulted in maximal tumor responses. Minor intra- and intercycle accumulation of LY2606368 was observed at the MTDs for both schedules. Two patients (4.4%) had a partial response; one had squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the anus and one had SCC of the head and neck. Fifteen patients (33.3%) had a best overall response of stable disease (range, 1.2 to 6.7 months), six of whom had SCC.
CONCLUSION: An LY2606368 dose of 105 mg/m(2) once every 14 days is being evaluated as the recommended phase II dose in dose-expansion cohorts for patients with SCC.
© 2016 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27044938      PMCID: PMC5321045          DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2015.64.5788

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  13 in total

1.  2006 update of recommendations for the use of white blood cell growth factors: an evidence-based clinical practice guideline.

Authors:  Thomas J Smith; James Khatcheressian; Gary H Lyman; Howard Ozer; James O Armitage; Lodovico Balducci; Charles L Bennett; Scott B Cantor; Jeffrey Crawford; Scott J Cross; George Demetri; Christopher E Desch; Philip A Pizzo; Charles A Schiffer; Lee Schwartzberg; Mark R Somerfield; George Somlo; James C Wade; James L Wade; Rodger J Winn; Antoinette J Wozniak; Antonio C Wolff
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-05-08       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Phase I dose-escalation study of AZD7762, a checkpoint kinase inhibitor, in combination with gemcitabine in US patients with advanced solid tumors.

Authors:  Edward Sausville; Patricia Lorusso; Michael Carducci; Judith Carter; Mary F Quinn; Lisa Malburg; Nilofer Azad; David Cosgrove; Richard Knight; Peter Barker; Sonya Zabludoff; Felix Agbo; Patricia Oakes; Adrian Senderowicz
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 3.333

3.  LY2606368 Causes Replication Catastrophe and Antitumor Effects through CHK1-Dependent Mechanisms.

Authors:  Constance King; H Bruce Diaz; Samuel McNeely; Darlene Barnard; Jack Dempsey; Wayne Blosser; Richard Beckmann; David Barda; Mark S Marshall
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 6.261

4.  Chk1/2 inhibition overcomes the cisplatin resistance of head and neck cancer cells secondary to the loss of functional p53.

Authors:  Mayur A Gadhikar; Maria Rita Sciuto; Marcus Vinicius Ortega Alves; Curtis R Pickering; Abdullah A Osman; David M Neskey; Mei Zhao; Alison L Fitzgerald; Jeffrey N Myers; Mitchell J Frederick
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 6.261

5.  Phase I dose-escalation trial of checkpoint kinase 1 inhibitor MK-8776 as monotherapy and in combination with gemcitabine in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Authors:  Adil I Daud; Michelle T Ashworth; Jonathan Strosberg; Jonathan W Goldman; David Mendelson; Gregory Springett; Alan P Venook; Sabine Loechner; Lee S Rosen; Frances Shanahan; David Parry; Stuart Shumway; Jennifer A Grabowsky; Tomoko Freshwater; Christopher Sorge; Soonmo Peter Kang; Randi Isaacs; Pamela N Munster
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1).

Authors:  E A Eisenhauer; P Therasse; J Bogaerts; L H Schwartz; D Sargent; R Ford; J Dancey; S Arbuck; S Gwyther; M Mooney; L Rubinstein; L Shankar; L Dodd; R Kaplan; D Lacombe; J Verweij
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 9.162

7.  Phase I, dose-escalation study of AZD7762 alone and in combination with gemcitabine in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumours.

Authors:  Takashi Seto; Taito Esaki; Fumihiko Hirai; Shuji Arita; Kaname Nosaki; Akitaka Makiyama; Takuro Kometani; Chinatsu Fujimoto; Motoharu Hamatake; Hiroaki Takeoka; Felix Agbo; Xiaojin Shi
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2013-07-28       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 8.  New insights into checkpoint kinase 1 in the DNA damage response signaling network.

Authors:  Yun Dai; Steven Grant
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  Preclinical analyses and phase I evaluation of LY2603618 administered in combination with pemetrexed and cisplatin in patients with advanced cancer.

Authors:  Emiliano Calvo; Victor J Chen; Mark Marshall; Ute Ohnmacht; Scott M Hynes; Elizabeth Kumm; H Bruce Diaz; Darlene Barnard; Farhana F Merzoug; Lysiane Huber; Lisa Kays; Philip Iversen; Antonio Calles; Beatrice Voss; Aimee Bence Lin; Nicolas Dickgreber; Thomas Wehler; Martin Sebastian
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 10.  Replication stress and cancer: it takes two to tango.

Authors:  Emilio Lecona; Oscar Fernández-Capetillo
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 3.905

View more
  57 in total

1.  Chk1 inhibition potentiates the therapeutic efficacy of PARP inhibitor BMN673 in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Yuping Yin; Qian Shen; Peng Zhang; Ruikang Tao; Weilong Chang; Ruidong Li; Gengchen Xie; Weizhen Liu; Lihong Zhang; Prabodh Kapoor; Shumei Song; Jaffer Ajani; Gordon B Mills; Jianying Chen; Kaixiong Tao; Guang Peng
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 6.166

Review 2.  Combination Platinum-based and DNA Damage Response-targeting Cancer Therapy: Evolution and Future Directions.

Authors:  Spyridon P Basourakos; Likun Li; Ana M Aparicio; Paul G Corn; Jeri Kim; Timothy C Thompson
Journal:  Curr Med Chem       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 3.  Pharmacotherapy of Anal Cancer.

Authors:  Jane E Rogers; Cathy Eng
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Transient inhibition of p53 homologs protects ovarian function from two distinct apoptotic pathways triggered by anticancer therapies.

Authors:  So-Youn Kim; Devi M Nair; Megan Romero; Vanida A Serna; Anthony J Koleske; Teresa K Woodruff; Takeshi Kurita
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 15.828

5.  Broad Spectrum Activity of the Checkpoint Kinase 1 Inhibitor Prexasertib as a Single Agent or Chemopotentiator Across a Range of Preclinical Pediatric Tumor Models.

Authors:  Caitlin D Lowery; Michele Dowless; Matthew Renschler; Wayne Blosser; Alle B VanWye; Jennifer R Stephens; Philip W Iversen; Aimee Bence Lin; Richard P Beckmann; Kateryna Krytska; Kristina A Cole; John M Maris; Douglas S Hawkins; Brian P Rubin; Raushan T Kurmasheva; Peter J Houghton; Richard Gorlick; E Anders Kolb; Min H Kang; C Patrick Reynolds; Stephen W Erickson; Beverly A Teicher; Malcolm A Smith; Louis F Stancato
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 6.  The promise of circulating tumor cells for precision cancer therapy.

Authors:  William L Hwang; Katie L Hwang; David T Miyamoto
Journal:  Biomark Med       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 2.851

Review 7.  Targeting DNA Repair in Cancer: Beyond PARP Inhibitors.

Authors:  Jessica S Brown; Brent O'Carrigan; Stephen P Jackson; Timothy A Yap
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 39.397

8.  Targeting AXL and mTOR Pathway Overcomes Primary and Acquired Resistance to WEE1 Inhibition in Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Triparna Sen; Pan Tong; Lixia Diao; Lerong Li; Youhong Fan; Jennifer Hoff; John V Heymach; Jing Wang; Lauren Averett Byers
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  CHK1 Inhibition in Small-Cell Lung Cancer Produces Single-Agent Activity in Biomarker-Defined Disease Subsets and Combination Activity with Cisplatin or Olaparib.

Authors:  Triparna Sen; Pan Tong; C Allison Stewart; Sandra Cristea; Aly Valliani; David S Shames; Abena B Redwood; You Hong Fan; Lerong Li; Bonnie S Glisson; John D Minna; Julien Sage; Don L Gibbons; Helen Piwnica-Worms; John V Heymach; Jing Wang; Lauren Averett Byers
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  mTORC1/2 and Protein Translation Regulate Levels of CHK1 and the Sensitivity to CHK1 Inhibitors in Ewing Sarcoma Cells.

Authors:  Stacia L Koppenhafer; Kelli L Goss; William W Terry; David J Gordon
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 6.261

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.