Literature DB >> 25605849

Phase I dose-escalation trial of checkpoint kinase 1 inhibitor MK-8776 as monotherapy and in combination with gemcitabine in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Adil I Daud1, Michelle T Ashworth2, Jonathan Strosberg2, Jonathan W Goldman2, David Mendelson2, Gregory Springett2, Alan P Venook2, Sabine Loechner2, Lee S Rosen2, Frances Shanahan2, David Parry2, Stuart Shumway2, Jennifer A Grabowsky2, Tomoko Freshwater2, Christopher Sorge2, Soonmo Peter Kang2, Randi Isaacs2, Pamela N Munster2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We determined the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and recommended phase II dose of MK-8776 (SCH 900776), a potent, selective checkpoint kinase 1 (Chk1) inhibitor, as monotherapy and in combination with gemcitabine in a first-in-human phase I clinical trial in patients with advanced solid tumor malignancies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-three patients were treated by intravenous infusion with MK-8776 at seven dose levels ranging from 10 to 150 mg/m(2) as monotherapy and then in combination with gemcitabine 800 mg/m(2) (part A, n = 26) or gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) (part B, n = 17). Forty percent of patients had three or more prior treatment regimens, and one third of patients had previously received gemcitabine.
RESULTS: As monotherapy, MK-8776 was well tolerated, with QTc prolongation (19%), nausea (16%), fatigue (14%), and constipation (14%) as the most frequent adverse effects. Combination therapy demonstrated a higher frequency of adverse effects, predominantly fatigue (63%), nausea (44%), decreased appetite (37%), thrombocytopenia (32%), and neutropenia (24%), as well as dose-related, transient QTc prolongation (17%). The median number of doses of MK-8776 administered was five doses, with relative dose-intensity of 0.96. Bioactivity was assessed by γ-H2AX ex vivo assay. Of 30 patients evaluable for response, two showed partial response, and 13 exhibited stable disease.
CONCLUSION: MK-8776 was well tolerated as monotherapy and in combination with gemcitabine. Early evidence of clinical efficacy was observed. The recommended phase II dose is MK-8776 200 mg plus gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle.
© 2015 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25605849     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2014.57.5027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  79 in total

1.  A Genome-Wide Pooled shRNA Screen Identifies PPP2R2A as a Predictive Biomarker for the Response to ATR and CHK1 Inhibitors.

Authors:  Zhaojun Qiu; Pengyan Fa; Tao Liu; Chandra B Prasad; Shanhuai Ma; Zhipeng Hong; Ernest R Chan; Hongbing Wang; Zaibo Li; Kai He; Qi-En Wang; Terence M Williams; Chunhong Yan; Steven T Sizemore; Goutham Narla; Junran Zhang
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 12.701

2.  Mechanistic Distinctions between CHK1 and WEE1 Inhibition Guide the Scheduling of Triple Therapy with Gemcitabine.

Authors:  Siang-Boon Koh; Yann Wallez; Charles R Dunlop; Sandra Bernaldo de Quirós Fernández; Tashinga E Bapiro; Frances M Richards; Duncan I Jodrell
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Selective induction of DNA damage, G2 abrogation, and mitochondrial apoptosis by leaf extract of traditional medicinal plant Wrightia arborea in K562 cells.

Authors:  T Lakshmipriya; T Soumya; P R Jayasree; P R Manish Kumar
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 3.356

Review 4.  Cell Cycle Regulation and Melanoma.

Authors:  Wen Xu; Grant McArthur
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 5.075

5.  The contribution of DNA replication stress marked by high-intensity, pan-nuclear γH2AX staining to chemosensitization by CHK1 and WEE1 inhibitors.

Authors:  Leslie A Parsels; Joshua D Parsels; Daria M Tanska; Jonathan Maybaum; Theodore S Lawrence; Meredith A Morgan
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 4.534

6.  Transient inhibition of p53 homologs protects ovarian function from two distinct apoptotic pathways triggered by anticancer therapies.

Authors:  So-Youn Kim; Devi M Nair; Megan Romero; Vanida A Serna; Anthony J Koleske; Teresa K Woodruff; Takeshi Kurita
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 15.828

Review 7.  Translational and clinical implications of the genetic landscape of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Daniel E Spratt; Zachary S Zumsteg; Felix Y Feng; Scott A Tomlins
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 8.  Targeting DNA Repair in Cancer: Beyond PARP Inhibitors.

Authors:  Jessica S Brown; Brent O'Carrigan; Stephen P Jackson; Timothy A Yap
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 39.397

Review 9.  Perspectives on the combination of radiotherapy and targeted therapy with DNA repair inhibitors in the treatment of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Shih-Hung Yang; Ting-Chun Kuo; Hsu Wu; Jhe-Cyuan Guo; Chiun Hsu; Chih-Hung Hsu; Yu-Wen Tien; Kun-Huei Yeh; Ann-Lii Cheng; Sung-Hsin Kuo
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-08-28       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Natural product β-thujaplicin inhibits homologous recombination repair and sensitizes cancer cells to radiation therapy.

Authors:  Lihong Zhang; Yang Peng; Ivan P Uray; Jianfeng Shen; Lulu Wang; Xiangdong Peng; Powel H Brown; Wei Tu; Guang Peng
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2017-10-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.