| Literature DB >> 27042311 |
Kazuhiro Sugiyama1, Masahiro Kashiura1, Akiko Akashi1, Takahiro Tanabe1, Yuichi Hamabe1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The early prediction of neurological outcomes in postcardiac arrest patients treated with therapeutic hypothermia (TH) remains challenging. Amplitude-integrated electroencephalography (aEEG) is a type of quantitative EEG. A particular cutoff time from the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) to the recovery of a normal aEEG trace for predicting a good neurological outcome has not yet been established. The purpose of the present study was to examine the relation between neurological outcomes and the continuous normal voltage (CNV) recovery time in adult comatose survivors of cardiac arrest treated with TH and identify the recovery time cutoff for predicting a good neurological outcome.Entities:
Keywords: Amplitude-integrated electroencephalography; Cardiac arrest; Neurological outcome; Therapeutic hypothermia
Year: 2016 PMID: 27042311 PMCID: PMC4818927 DOI: 10.1186/s40560-016-0152-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Intensive Care ISSN: 2052-0492
Fig. 1Placement of electrodes for amplitude-integrated electroencephalography (aEEG) monitoring. Cup electrodes are attached at positions Fp1 and Fp2, and aEEG monitoring was performed for the bipolar channel Fp1-Fp2
Fig. 2Classification system of the patterns of amplitude-integrated electroencephalography traces used in the study
Fig. 3Flow chart of patient selection. aEEG amplitude-integrated electroencephalography, CNV continuous normal voltage
Comparison of patient characteristics between patients with good and poor neurological outcomes
| All patients ( | Good outcome ( | Poor outcome ( |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years)a | 62 (45–71) | 47 (43–66) | 70 (62–72) | 0.01b |
| Male, number (%) | 27 (90 %) | 15 (83 %) | 12 (100 %) | 0.26c |
| Witnessed collapse | 26 (87 %) | 16 (89 %) | 10 (83 %) | 1c |
| Time from collapse to | ||||
| ROSC (min)a | 22 (18–40) | 19 (14–22) | 44 (30–47) | <0.001b |
| Target temperature (h)a | 5.5 (4.2–6.7) | 6.1 (5.3–8.0) | 4.0 (1.3–5.7) | 0.02b |
| aEEG monitoring (h)a | 6.8 (4.8–8.5) | 6.1 (4.7–8.2) | 6.9 (5.3–9.3) | 0.35b |
| Duration of aEEG monitoring (h)a | 50 (45–63) | 53 (46–58) | 47 (45–68) | 0.90b |
| Coronary angiography, number (%) | 28 (93 %) | 17 (94 %) | 11 (92 %) | 1c |
| ECPR, number (%) | 4 (13 %) | 0 (0 %) | 4 (33 %) | 0.02c |
ROSC return of spontaneous circulation, aEEG amplitude-integrated electroencephalography, CPC cerebral performance category, ECPR extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation
aMedian (interquartile range)
bMann-Whitney U test
cFisher’s exact test
Fig. 4Recovery time of CNV between patients with good outcomes and those with poor outcomes. The CNV recovery time is presented as median (interquartile range). The Mann-Whitney U test was used for the comparison. CNV continuous normal voltage
Fig. 5ROC curve of the CNV recovery time to predict a good neurological outcome. ROC receiver operating characteristic, CNV continuous normal voltage, AUROC area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, CI confidence interval
Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of the CNV recovery time cutoff of 23 h
| Good outcome ( | Poor outcome ( | Sensitivity (95 % CI) | Specificity (95 % CI) | PPV (95 % CI) | NPV (95 % CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CNV recovery time ≤23 h | 16 | 0 | 89 (65–97) | 100 (64–100) | 100 (71–100) | 86 (57–98) |
| CNV recovery time >23 h or no CNV trace | 2 | 12 |
CNV continuous normal voltage, PPV positive predictive value, NPV negative predictive value, CI confidence interval