Florence Dumas1, Thomas D Rea. 1. Emergency Medical Services Division of Public Health for Seattle and King County, Seattle, WA 98104 , USA. dumasf@u.washington.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Little is known about long-term prognosis following resuscitation from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, especially as it relates to the presenting rhythm or arrest aetiology. We investigated long-term survival among those discharged alive following resuscitation according to presenting rhythm and arrest aetiology. METHODS: We conducted a cohort investigation of all non-traumatic adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients resuscitated and discharged alive from hospital between January 1, 2001 and December 31, 2009 in a large metropolitan emergency medical service system. Information about demographics, circumstances, presenting arrest rhythm and aetiology was collected using the dispatch, EMS, and hospital records. Long-term vital status was ascertained using state death records and the Social Security Death Index through 31st December 2010. We used Kaplan Meier to evaluate survival. RESULTS: During the study period, a total of 1001/5958 (17%) persons were resuscitated and discharged alive, of whom 313/1001 (31%) presented with a non-shockable rhythm and 210/1001 (21%) had a non-cardiac aetiology. Overall median survival was 9.8 years with 64% surviving >5 years. Five-year survival was 43% for non-shockable rhythms compared to 73% for shockable rhythms, and 45% for non-cardiac aetiology compared to 69% for cardiac aetiology (p<0.001 respectively). CONCLUSION: Cardiac arrest due to non-shockable rhythm or non-cardiac aetiology comprises a substantial proportion of those who survive to hospital discharge. Although long-term survival in these groups is less than their shockable or cardiac aetiology counterparts, nearly half are alive 5 years following discharge. The findings support efforts to improve resuscitation care for those with non-shockable rhythms or non-cardiac cause.
OBJECTIVE: Little is known about long-term prognosis following resuscitation from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, especially as it relates to the presenting rhythm or arrest aetiology. We investigated long-term survival among those discharged alive following resuscitation according to presenting rhythm and arrest aetiology. METHODS: We conducted a cohort investigation of all non-traumatic adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrestpatients resuscitated and discharged alive from hospital between January 1, 2001 and December 31, 2009 in a large metropolitan emergency medical service system. Information about demographics, circumstances, presenting arrest rhythm and aetiology was collected using the dispatch, EMS, and hospital records. Long-term vital status was ascertained using state death records and the Social Security Death Index through 31st December 2010. We used Kaplan Meier to evaluate survival. RESULTS: During the study period, a total of 1001/5958 (17%) persons were resuscitated and discharged alive, of whom 313/1001 (31%) presented with a non-shockable rhythm and 210/1001 (21%) had a non-cardiac aetiology. Overall median survival was 9.8 years with 64% surviving >5 years. Five-year survival was 43% for non-shockable rhythms compared to 73% for shockable rhythms, and 45% for non-cardiac aetiology compared to 69% for cardiac aetiology (p<0.001 respectively). CONCLUSION:Cardiac arrest due to non-shockable rhythm or non-cardiac aetiology comprises a substantial proportion of those who survive to hospital discharge. Although long-term survival in these groups is less than their shockable or cardiac aetiology counterparts, nearly half are alive 5 years following discharge. The findings support efforts to improve resuscitation care for those with non-shockable rhythms or non-cardiac cause.
Authors: Julia M Umińska; Jakub Ratajczak; Katarzyna Buszko; Przemysław Sobczak; Wiktor Sroka; Michał P Marszałł; Piotr Adamski; Klemen Steblovnik; Marko Noč; Jacek Kubica Journal: Cardiol J Date: 2019-02-25 Impact factor: 2.737
Authors: Jukka Vaahersalo; Pamela Hiltunen; Marjaana Tiainen; Tuomas Oksanen; Kirsi-Maija Kaukonen; Jouni Kurola; Esko Ruokonen; Jyrki Tenhunen; Tero Ala-Kokko; Vesa Lund; Matti Reinikainen; Outi Kiviniemi; Tom Silfvast; Markku Kuisma; Tero Varpula; Ville Pettilä Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2013-02-16 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: David J Wallace; Jeremy M Kahn; Derek C Angus; Christian Martin-Gill; Clifton W Callaway; Thomas D Rea; Jagpreet Chhatwal; Kristen Kurland; Christopher W Seymour Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2014-01 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Jonathan Elmer; Jon C Rittenberger; Patrick J Coppler; Francis X Guyette; Ankur A Doshi; Clifton W Callaway Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2016-09-17 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Peter J Kudenchuk; Claudio Sandroni; Hendrik R Drinhaus; Bernd W Böttiger; Alain Cariou; Kjetil Sunde; Martin Dworschak; Fabio Silvio Taccone; Nicolas Deye; Hans Friberg; Steven Laureys; Didier Ledoux; Mauro Oddo; Stéphane Legriel; Philippe Hantson; Jean-Luc Diehl; Pierre-Francois Laterre Journal: Ann Intensive Care Date: 2015-09-17 Impact factor: 6.925
Authors: Lisa M Tilemann; Jan Stiepak; Thomas Zelniker; Emanuel Chorianopoulos; Evangelos Giannitsis; Hugo A Katus; Oliver J Müller; Michael Preusch Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2015-10-27 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Paul S Chan; Bryan McNally; Brahmajee K Nallamothu; Fengming Tang; Bradley G Hammill; John A Spertus; Lesley H Curtis Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2016-03-15 Impact factor: 5.501