Literature DB >> 27040404

Reconstruction of the proximal femur with a modular resection prosthesis.

Teresa Calabró1, Rupert Van Rooyen1, Ilaria Piraino1, Elisa Pala1, Giulia Trovarelli1, Georgios N Panagopoulos2, Panayiotis D Megaloikonomos2, Andrea Angelini1, Andreas F Mavrogenis2, Pietro Ruggieri3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Various megaprostheses are currently available for reconstruction of the proximal femur after tumor resection. This study evaluates the survival and complications of a modular megaprosthesis for reconstruction of the proximal femur.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied the medical files of 109 tumor patients (age range 16-86 years) who underwent proximal femoral reconstruction with the MRP(®) megaprosthesis from 2002 to 2011. There were 70 patients with metastases, 34 patients with bone sarcomas, and five patients with hematological malignancies; 82 were primary and 27 were revision reconstructions. Mean follow-up was 2.5 years; 31 patients had a minimum five-year follow-up. We evaluated the survival and function of the patients, and the survival and complications of the megaprostheses.
RESULTS: Survival was significantly higher for the patients with bone sarcomas compared to those with metastases and hematological malignancies. Mean MSTS functional score was similar between patients with bone sarcomas and those with hematological malignancies and metastases, and between patients with primary and those with revision reconstructions. Overall survival of the MRP(®) megaprostheses was 74 % at 5 and 9 years. Fourteen (13.6 %) major complications occurred at a mean period of 1.4 years (range 3 months to 4.5 years); these included infection (5.8 %), dislocation (3.9 %), local recurrence (2.9 %), and acetabular fracture (1 %).
CONCLUSION: MRP(®) megaprostheses are a valuable reconstruction option after tumor resection of the proximal femur.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Limb salvage; MRP®; Megaprosthetic reconstruction; Proximal femur

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27040404     DOI: 10.1007/s00590-016-1764-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol        ISSN: 1633-8065


  35 in total

1.  Soft tissue reconstruction of megaprostheses using a trevira tube.

Authors:  G Gosheger; A Hillmann; N Lindner; R Rödl; C Hoffmann; H Bürger; W Winkelmann
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  Infected tumor prostheses.

Authors:  Andreas F Mavrogenis; Panayiotis J Papagelopoulos; Luis Coll-Mesa; Elisa Pala; Giovanni Guerra; Pietro Ruggieri
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.390

3.  Outcome of pathologic fractures of the proximal femur in nonosteogenic primary bone sarcoma.

Authors:  C R Chandrasekar; R J Grimer; S R Carter; R M Tillman; A T Abudu; L M Jeys
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-03-04       Impact factor: 4.424

Review 4.  Failure mode classification for tumor endoprostheses: retrospective review of five institutions and a literature review.

Authors:  Eric R Henderson; John S Groundland; Elisa Pala; Jeremy A Dennis; Rebecca Wooten; David Cheong; Reinhard Windhager; Rainer I Kotz; Mario Mercuri; Philipp T Funovics; Francis J Hornicek; H Thomas Temple; Pietro Ruggieri; G Douglas Letson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 5.  Pathological fractures in primary bone sarcomas.

Authors:  Panayiotis J Papagelopoulos; Andreas F Mavrogenis; Olga D Savvidou; Ioannis S Benetos; Evanthia C Galanis; Panayotis N Soucacos
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2007-12-03       Impact factor: 2.586

Review 6.  Endoprosthetic proximal femur replacement: metastatic versus primary tumors.

Authors:  Benjamin K Potter; Vincent E Chow; Sheila C Adams; G Douglas Letson; H Thomas Temple
Journal:  Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 3.279

7.  Unipolar proximal femoral endoprosthetic replacement for tumour: the risk of revision in young patients.

Authors:  C R Chandrasekar; R J Grimer; S R Carter; R M Tillman; A Abudu; L M Jeys
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2009-03

8.  Experience with cemented large segment endoprostheses for tumors.

Authors:  Sanjeev Sharma; Robert E Turcotte; Marc H Isler; Cindy Wong
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Bipolar proximal femoral replacement prostheses for musculoskeletal neoplasms.

Authors:  Joseph L Finstein; Joseph J King; Edward J Fox; Christian M Ogilvie; Richard D Lackman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  How long do endoprosthetic reconstructions for proximal femoral tumors last?

Authors:  Nicholas M Bernthal; Adam J Schwartz; Daniel A Oakes; J Michael Kabo; Jeffrey J Eckardt
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Megaprosthesis versus Allograft Prosthesis Composite for massive skeletal defects.

Authors:  Deepak Gautam; Rajesh Malhotra
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2017-09-25

2.  Silver-coated megaprostheses in the proximal femur in patients with sarcoma.

Authors:  Arne Streitbuerger; Marcel P Henrichs; Gregor Hauschild; Markus Nottrott; Wiebke Guder; Jendrik Hardes
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-06-20

Review 3.  Fatigue failure of the cephalomedullary nail: revision options, outcomes and review of the literature.

Authors:  Adam Tucker; Michael Warnock; Sinead McDonald; Laurence Cusick; Andrew P Foster
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-10-17

4.  [Perioperative clinical characteristics of patients with pathological fracture of proximal femur].

Authors:  Y P Cui; C Mi; B Wang; Y X Pa; Y F Lin; X D Shi
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2019-10-18

5.  Cemented vs uncemented megaprostheses in proximal femur metastases: a multicentric comparative study.

Authors:  Maria Serena Oliva; Francesco Muratori; Raffaele Vitiello; Antonio Ziranu; Lorenzo Foschi; Giuseppe Rovere; Cesare Meschini; Domenico Andrea Campanacci; Giulio Maccauro
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 2.562

6.  Is three-dimensional-printed custom-made ultra-short stem with a porous structure an acceptable reconstructive alternative in peri-knee metaphysis for the tumorous bone defect?

Authors:  Jie Wang; Jingjing An; Li Min; Chongqi Tu; Minxun Lu; Yuqi Zhang; Jingqi Lin; Yi Luo; Yong Zhou
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-08-08       Impact factor: 2.754

Review 7.  Implant Survival, Clinical Outcome and Complications of Megaprosthetic Reconstructions Following Sarcoma Resection.

Authors:  Christoph Theil; Jan Schwarze; Georg Gosheger; Burkhard Moellenbeck; Kristian Nikolaus Schneider; Niklas Deventer; Sebastian Klingebiel; George Grammatopoulos; Friedrich Boettner; Tom Schmidt-Braekling
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 6.639

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.