Jie Wang1,2, Jingjing An1,3, Li Min1,2, Chongqi Tu4,5, Minxun Lu1,2, Yuqi Zhang1,2, Jingqi Lin1, Yi Luo1,2, Yong Zhou1,2. 1. Department of Orthopaedics, Orthopaedic Research Institute, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China. 2. Bone and Joint 3D-Printing and Biomechanical Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China. 3. Department of Operating Room, West China Hospital, Sichuan University/ West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China. 4. Department of Orthopaedics, Orthopaedic Research Institute, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China. Tucq@scu.edu.cn. 5. Bone and Joint 3D-Printing and Biomechanical Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People's Republic of China. Tucq@scu.edu.cn.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Long-lasting reconstruction after extensive resection involving peri-knee metaphysis is a challenging problem in orthopedic oncology. Various reconstruction methods have been proposed, but they are characterized by a high complication rate. The purposes of this study were to (1) assess osseointegration at the bone implant interface and correlated incidence of aseptic loosening; (2) identify complications including infection, endoprosthesis fracture, periprosthetic fracture, leg length discrepancy, and wound healing problem in this case series; and (3) evaluate the short-term function of the patient who received this personalized reconstruction system. METHODS: Between September 2016 and June 2018, our center treated 15 patients with malignancies arising in the femur or tibia shaft using endoprosthesis with a 3D-printed custom-made stem. Osseointegration and aseptic loosening were assessed with digital tomosynthesis. Complications were recorded by reviewing the patients' records. The function was evaluated with the 1993 version of the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS-93) score at a median of 42 (range, 34 to 54) months after reconstruction. RESULTS: One patient who experienced early aseptic loosening was managed with immobilization and bisphosphonates infusion. All implants were well osseointegrated at the final follow-up examination. There are two periprosthetic fractures intraoperatively. The wire was applied to assist fixation, and the fracture healed at the latest follow-up. Two patients experienced significant leg length discrepancies. The median MSTS-93 score was 26 (range, 23 to 30). CONCLUSIONS: A 3D-printed custom-made ultra-short stem with a porous structure provides acceptable early outcomes in patients who received peri-knee metaphyseal reconstruction. With detailed preoperative design and precise intraoperative techniques, the reasonable initial stability benefits osseointegration to osteoconductive porous titanium, and therefore ensures short- and possibly long-term durability. Personalized adaptive endoprosthesis, careful intraoperative operation, and strict follow-up management enable effective prevention and treatment of complications. The functional results in our series were acceptable thanks to reliable fixation in the bone-endoprosthesis interface and an individualized rehabilitation program. These positive results indicate this device series can be a feasible alternative for critical bone defect reconstruction. Nevertheless, longer follow-up is required to determine whether this technique is superior to other forms of fixation.
BACKGROUND: Long-lasting reconstruction after extensive resection involving peri-knee metaphysis is a challenging problem in orthopedic oncology. Various reconstruction methods have been proposed, but they are characterized by a high complication rate. The purposes of this study were to (1) assess osseointegration at the bone implant interface and correlated incidence of aseptic loosening; (2) identify complications including infection, endoprosthesis fracture, periprosthetic fracture, leg length discrepancy, and wound healing problem in this case series; and (3) evaluate the short-term function of the patient who received this personalized reconstruction system. METHODS: Between September 2016 and June 2018, our center treated 15 patients with malignancies arising in the femur or tibia shaft using endoprosthesis with a 3D-printed custom-made stem. Osseointegration and aseptic loosening were assessed with digital tomosynthesis. Complications were recorded by reviewing the patients' records. The function was evaluated with the 1993 version of the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS-93) score at a median of 42 (range, 34 to 54) months after reconstruction. RESULTS: One patient who experienced early aseptic loosening was managed with immobilization and bisphosphonates infusion. All implants were well osseointegrated at the final follow-up examination. There are two periprosthetic fractures intraoperatively. The wire was applied to assist fixation, and the fracture healed at the latest follow-up. Two patients experienced significant leg length discrepancies. The median MSTS-93 score was 26 (range, 23 to 30). CONCLUSIONS: A 3D-printed custom-made ultra-short stem with a porous structure provides acceptable early outcomes in patients who received peri-knee metaphyseal reconstruction. With detailed preoperative design and precise intraoperative techniques, the reasonable initial stability benefits osseointegration to osteoconductive porous titanium, and therefore ensures short- and possibly long-term durability. Personalized adaptive endoprosthesis, careful intraoperative operation, and strict follow-up management enable effective prevention and treatment of complications. The functional results in our series were acceptable thanks to reliable fixation in the bone-endoprosthesis interface and an individualized rehabilitation program. These positive results indicate this device series can be a feasible alternative for critical bone defect reconstruction. Nevertheless, longer follow-up is required to determine whether this technique is superior to other forms of fixation.
Authors: Georgios N Panagopoulos; Andreas F Mavrogenis; Cyril Mauffrey; Jan Lesenský; Andrea Angelini; Panayiotis D Megaloikonomos; Vasilios G Igoumenou; John Papanastassiou; Olga Savvidou; Pietro Ruggieri; Panayiotis J Papagelopoulos Journal: Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol Date: 2017-06-05
Authors: J I Albergo; L C Gaston; G L Farfalli; M Laitinen; M Parry; M A Ayerza; M Risk; L M Jeys; L A Aponte-Tinao Journal: Musculoskelet Surg Date: 2019-03-08
Authors: Konstantinos N Malizos; Charalampos G Zalavras; Panayotis N Soucacos; Alexandros E Beris; James R Urbaniak Journal: J Am Acad Orthop Surg Date: 2004 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 3.020
Authors: Meitao Xu; Ming Xu; Shuai Zhang; Hanqing Li; A I Qiuchi; Xiuchun Yu; Xu Quan Wang Journal: World J Surg Oncol Date: 2021-05-26 Impact factor: 2.754
Authors: Vincent Crenn; Yonis Quinette; Charlie Bouthors; Gilles Missenard; Brice Viard; Philippe Anract; Stéphane Boisgard; Eric Mascard; François Gouin Journal: World J Surg Oncol Date: 2022-06-13 Impact factor: 3.253