Literature DB >> 25786946

Effects of inherent envelope fluctuations in forward maskers for listeners with normal and impaired hearing.

Adam Svec1, Judy R Dubno2, Peggy B Nelson1.   

Abstract

Gaussian noise simultaneous maskers yield higher masked thresholds for pure tones than low-fluctuation noise simultaneous maskers for listeners with normal hearing. This increased masking effectiveness is thought to be due to inherent fluctuations in the temporal envelope of Gaussian noise, but effects of fluctuating forward maskers are unknown. Because differences in forward masking due to age and hearing loss are known, the current study assessed effects of masker envelope fluctuations for forward maskers in younger and older adults with normal hearing and older adults with hearing loss. Detection thresholds were measured in these three participant groups for a pure-tone probe in quiet and in Gaussian and low-fluctuation noise forward maskers with either 1 or 1/3 equivalent rectangular bandwidths. Higher masked thresholds were obtained for forward maskers with greater inherent envelope fluctuations for younger adults with normal hearing. This increased effectiveness of highly fluctuating forward maskers was similar for older adults with normal and impaired hearing. Because differences in recovery from forward masking between listeners with normal and impaired hearing may relate to differences in cochlear nonlinearities, these results suggest that mechanisms other than cochlear nonlinearities may be responsible for recovery from rapid masker envelope fluctuations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25786946      PMCID: PMC4368583          DOI: 10.1121/1.4908567

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  21 in total

1.  Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notched-noise data.

Authors:  B R Glasberg; B C Moore
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1990-08-01       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Forward masking of amplitude modulation: basic characteristics.

Authors:  Magdalena Wojtczak; Neal F Viemeister
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The effects of hearing loss and noise masking on the masking release for speech in temporally complex backgrounds.

Authors:  S P Bacon; J M Opie; D Y Montoya
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Temporal integration at 6 kHz as a function of masker bandwidth.

Authors:  A J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Modulation masking: effects of modulation frequency, depth, and phase.

Authors:  S P Bacon; D W Grantham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Across-critical-band processing of amplitude-modulated tones.

Authors:  W A Yost; S Sheft
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Confusion effects with sinusoidal and narrow-band noise forward maskers.

Authors:  D L Neff
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Transformed up-down methods in psychoacoustics.

Authors:  H Levitt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1971-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Development and the role of internal noise in detection and discrimination thresholds with narrow band stimuli.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Joseph W Hall; John H Grose
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Speech perception in gated noise: the effects of temporal resolution.

Authors:  Su-Hyun Jin; Peggy B Nelson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  2 in total

1.  Masking of short tones in noise: Evidence for envelope-based, rather than energy-based detection.

Authors:  Skyler G Jennings; Jessica Chen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Inherent envelope fluctuations in forward maskers: Effects of masker-probe delay for listeners with normal and impaired hearing.

Authors:  Adam Svec; Judy R Dubno; Peggy B Nelson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.840

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.