Literature DB >> 27036066

Enigmatic 5-hydroxymethyluracil: Oxidatively modified base, epigenetic mark or both?

Ryszard Olinski1, Marta Starczak2, Daniel Gackowski3.   

Abstract

The aim of this review is to describe the reactions which lead to generation of 5-hydroxymethyluracil, as well as the repair processes involved in its removal from DNA, and its level in various cells and urine. 5-hydroxymethyluracil may be formed during the course of the two processes: oxidation/hydroxylation of thymine with resultant formation of 5-hydroxymethyluracil paired with adenine (produced by reactive oxygen species), and reacting of reactive oxygen species with 5-methylcytosine forming 5-hydroxymethylcytosine, followed by its deamination to 5-hydroxymethyluracil mispaired with guanine. However, other, perhaps enzymatic, mechanism(s) may be involved in formation of 5-hydroxymethyluracil mispaired with guanine. Indeed, this mispair may be also formed as a result of deamination of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine, recently described "sixth" DNA base. It was demonstrated that 5-hydroxymethyluracil paired with adenine can be also generated by TET enzymes from thymine during mouse embryonic cell differentiation. Therefore, it is possible that 5-hydroxymethyluracil is epigenetic mark. The level of 5-hydroxymethyluracil in various somatic tissues is relatively stable and resembles that observed in lymphocytes, about 0.5/10(6) dN in human colon, colorectal cancer as well as various rat and porcine tissues. Experimental evidence suggests that SMUG1 and TDG are main enzymes involved in removal of 5-hydroxymethyluracil from DNA. 5-hydroxymethyluracil, in form of 5-hydroxymethyluridine, was also detected in rRNA, and together with SMUG1 may play a role in rRNA quality control. To summarize, 5-hydroxymethyluracil is with no doubt a product of both enzymatic and reactive oxygen species-induced reaction. This modification may probably serve as an epigenetic mark, providing additional layer of information encoded within the genome. However, the pool of 5-hydroxymethyluracil generated as a result of oxidative stress is also likely to disturb physiological epigenetic processes, and as such may be defined as a lesion. Altogether this suggests that 5-hydroxymethyluracil may be either a regulatory or erroneous compound.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  5-Hydroxymethylcytosine; 5-Hydroxymethyluracil; Base mispair; Deamination; Epigenetics; Oxidative DNA damage

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27036066     DOI: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2016.02.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res        ISSN: 1383-5742            Impact factor:   5.657


  21 in total

Review 1.  Occurrence, Biological Consequences, and Human Health Relevance of Oxidative Stress-Induced DNA Damage.

Authors:  Yang Yu; Yuxiang Cui; Laura J Niedernhofer; Yinsheng Wang
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 3.739

2.  Replacement of 2'-Deoxycytidine by 2'-Deoxycytidine Analogues in the E. coli Genome.

Authors:  Angad P Mehta; Han Li; Sean A Reed; Lubica Supekova; Tsotne Javahishvili; Peter G Schultz
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 15.419

3.  Dynamic changes in genomic 5-hydroxymethyluracil and N6-methyladenine levels in the Drosophila melanogaster life cycle and in response to different temperature conditions.

Authors:  Marta Starczak; Maciej Gawronski; Aleksandra Wasilow; Pawel Mijewski; Ryszard Olinski; Daniel Gackowski
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-20       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Oxidation Products of 5-Methylcytosine are Decreased in Senescent Cells and Tissues of Progeroid Mice.

Authors:  Ewelina Zarakowska; Jolanta Czerwinska; Agnieszka Tupalska; Matt J Yousefzadeh; Siobhán Q Gregg; Claudette M St Croix; Laura J Niedernhofer; Marek Foksinski; Daniel Gackowski; Anna Szpila; Marta Starczak; Barbara Tudek; Ryszard Olinski
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 6.053

5.  Replacement of Thymidine by a Modified Base in the Escherichia coli Genome.

Authors:  Angad P Mehta; Han Li; Sean A Reed; Lubica Supekova; Tsotne Javahishvili; Peter G Schultz
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 15.419

6.  Biomarkers of nucleic acid oxidation - A summary state-of-the-art.

Authors:  Mu-Rong Chao; Mark D Evans; Chiung-Wen Hu; Yunhee Ji; Peter Møller; Pavel Rossner; Marcus S Cooke
Journal:  Redox Biol       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 11.799

7.  Urinary Measurement of Epigenetic DNA Modifications: A Non-Invasive Assessment of the Whole-Body Epigenetic Status in Healthy Subjects and Colorectal Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Rafal Rozalski; Daniel Gackowski; Agnieszka Siomek-Gorecka; Zbigniew Banaszkiewicz; Ryszard Olinski
Journal:  ChemistryOpen       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 2.911

8.  Retracted Article: Divergent synthesis of 5-substituted pyrimidine 2'-deoxynucleosides and their incorporation into oligodeoxynucleotides for the survey of uracil DNA glycosylases.

Authors:  Ai Tran; Song Zheng; Dawanna S White; Alyson M Curry; Yana Cen
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 9.825

Review 9.  Melatonin in Retinal Physiology and Pathology: The Case of Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

Authors:  Janusz Blasiak; Russel J Reiter; Kai Kaarniranta
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2016-09-05       Impact factor: 6.543

10.  Uracil Accumulation and Mutagenesis Dominated by Cytosine Deamination in CpG Dinucleotides in Mice Lacking UNG and SMUG1.

Authors:  Lene Alsøe; Antonio Sarno; Sergio Carracedo; Diana Domanska; Felix Dingler; Lisa Lirussi; Tanima SenGupta; Nuriye Basdag Tekin; Laure Jobert; Ludmil B Alexandrov; Anastasia Galashevskaya; Cristina Rada; Geir Kjetil Sandve; Torbjørn Rognes; Hans E Krokan; Hilde Nilsen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.