Literature DB >> 28775312

Uracil Accumulation and Mutagenesis Dominated by Cytosine Deamination in CpG Dinucleotides in Mice Lacking UNG and SMUG1.

Lene Alsøe1,2, Antonio Sarno3,4, Sergio Carracedo1,2, Diana Domanska5, Felix Dingler6, Lisa Lirussi1,2, Tanima SenGupta1,2, Nuriye Basdag Tekin1,2, Laure Jobert1,2,7, Ludmil B Alexandrov8,9,10, Anastasia Galashevskaya3, Cristina Rada6, Geir Kjetil Sandve5, Torbjørn Rognes5,11, Hans E Krokan3, Hilde Nilsen12,13.   

Abstract

Both a DNA lesion and an intermediate for antibody maturation, uracil is primarily processed by base excision repair (BER), either initiated by uracil-DNA glycosylase (UNG) or by single-strand selective monofunctional uracil DNA glycosylase (SMUG1). The relative in vivo contributions of each glycosylase remain elusive. To assess the impact of SMUG1 deficiency, we measured uracil and 5-hydroxymethyluracil, another SMUG1 substrate, in Smug1 -/- mice. We found that 5-hydroxymethyluracil accumulated in Smug1 -/- tissues and correlated with 5-hydroxymethylcytosine levels. The highest increase was found in brain, which contained about 26-fold higher genomic 5-hydroxymethyluracil levels than the wild type. Smug1 -/- mice did not accumulate uracil in their genome and Ung -/- mice showed slightly elevated uracil levels. Contrastingly, Ung -/- Smug1 -/- mice showed a synergistic increase in uracil levels with up to 25-fold higher uracil levels than wild type. Whole genome sequencing of UNG/SMUG1-deficient tumours revealed that combined UNG and SMUG1 deficiency leads to the accumulation of mutations, primarily C to T transitions within CpG sequences. This unexpected sequence bias suggests that CpG dinucleotides are intrinsically more mutation prone. In conclusion, we showed that SMUG1 efficiently prevent genomic uracil accumulation, even in the presence of UNG, and identified mutational signatures associated with combined UNG and SMUG1 deficiency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28775312      PMCID: PMC5543110          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-07314-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  57 in total

1.  The human genome browser at UCSC.

Authors:  W James Kent; Charles W Sugnet; Terrence S Furey; Krishna M Roskin; Tom H Pringle; Alan M Zahler; David Haussler
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  Oxidation of thymine to 5-formyluracil in DNA promotes misincorporation of dGMP and subsequent elongation of a mismatched primer terminus by DNA polymerase.

Authors:  A Masaoka; H Terato; M Kobayashi; Y Ohyama; H Ide
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2001-01-29       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Replication of DNA templates containing 5-formyluracil, a major oxidative lesion of thymine in DNA.

Authors:  Q M Zhang; H Sugiyama; I Miyabe; S Matsuda; I Saito; S Yonei
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1997-10-15       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 4.  The enigmatic thymine DNA glycosylase.

Authors:  Daniel Cortázar; Christophe Kunz; Yusuke Saito; Roland Steinacher; Primo Schär
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2006-11-20

5.  Nuclear and mitochondrial uracil-DNA glycosylases are generated by alternative splicing and transcription from different positions in the UNG gene.

Authors:  H Nilsen; M Otterlei; T Haug; K Solum; T A Nagelhus; F Skorpen; H E Krokan
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1997-02-15       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  C --> T mutagenesis and gamma-radiation sensitivity due to deficiency in the Smug1 and Ung DNA glycosylases.

Authors:  Qian An; Peter Robins; Tomas Lindahl; Deborah E Barnes
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2005-05-19       Impact factor: 11.598

7.  Uracil-DNA glycosylase (UNG)-deficient mice reveal a primary role of the enzyme during DNA replication.

Authors:  H Nilsen; I Rosewell; P Robins; C F Skjelbred; S Andersen; G Slupphaug; G Daly; H E Krokan; T Lindahl; D E Barnes
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 17.970

8.  Identification of high excision capacity for 5-hydroxymethyluracil mispaired with guanine in DNA of Escherichia coli MutM, Nei and Nth DNA glycosylases.

Authors:  Masaki Hori; Shuji Yonei; Hiroshi Sugiyama; Katsuhito Kino; Kazuo Yamamoto; Qiu-Mei Zhang
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-02-15       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Identification of a new uracil-DNA glycosylase family by expression cloning using synthetic inhibitors.

Authors:  K A Haushalter; M W Todd Stukenberg; M W Kirschner; G L Verdine
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1999-02-25       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  Cell cycle-specific UNG2 phosphorylations regulate protein turnover, activity and association with RPA.

Authors:  Lars Hagen; Bodil Kavli; Mirta M L Sousa; Kathrin Torseth; Nina B Liabakk; Ottar Sundheim; Javier Pena-Diaz; Marit Otterlei; Ole Hørning; Ole N Jensen; Hans E Krokan; Geir Slupphaug
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2007-12-13       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  25 in total

1.  Nucleosomes and the three glycosylases: High, medium, and low levels of excision by the uracil DNA glycosylase superfamily.

Authors:  Mary E Tarantino; Blaine J Dow; Alexander C Drohat; Sarah Delaney
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2018-09-20

Review 2.  Deoxyuracil in DNA and disease: Genomic signal or managed situation?

Authors:  James Chon; Martha S Field; Patrick J Stover
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2019-02-27

Review 3.  The base excision repair process: comparison between higher and lower eukaryotes.

Authors:  Nagham Nafiz Hindi; Noha Elsakrmy; Dindial Ramotar
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 9.261

4.  A regulatory network comprising let-7 miRNA and SMUG1 is associated with good prognosis in ER+ breast tumours.

Authors:  Lisa Lirussi; Dilara Ayyildiz; Yan Liu; Nicola P Montaldo; Sergio Carracedo; Miriam R Aure; Laure Jobert; Xavier Tekpli; Joel Touma; Torill Sauer; Emiliano Dalla; Vessela N Kristensen; Jürgen Geisler; Silvano Piazza; Gianluca Tell; Hilde Nilsen
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2022-10-14       Impact factor: 19.160

5.  Histone variants H3.3 and H2A.Z/H3.3 facilitate excision of uracil from nucleosome core particles.

Authors:  Chuxuan Li; Katelyn L Rioux; Sarah Delaney
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2022-06-12

6.  A Processive Protein Chimera Introduces Mutations across Defined DNA Regions In Vivo.

Authors:  Christopher L Moore; Louis J Papa; Matthew D Shoulders
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 15.419

Review 7.  The N-terminal domain of uracil-DNA glycosylase: Roles for disordered regions.

Authors:  Jacob L Perkins; Linlin Zhao
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2021-02-18

8.  DNA Methylation, Deamination, and Translesion Synthesis Combine to Generate Footprint Mutations in Cancer Driver Genes in B-Cell Derived Lymphomas and Other Cancers.

Authors:  Igor B Rogozin; Abiel Roche-Lima; Kathrin Tyryshkin; Kelvin Carrasquillo-Carrión; Artem G Lada; Lennard Y Poliakov; Elena Schwartz; Andreu Saura; Vyacheslav Yurchenko; David N Cooper; Anna R Panchenko; Youri I Pavlov
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 4.599

9.  REV1-Polζ maintains the viability of homologous recombination-deficient cancer cells through mutagenic repair of PRIMPOL-dependent ssDNA gaps.

Authors:  Angelo Taglialatela; Giuseppe Leuzzi; Vincenzo Sannino; Raquel Cuella-Martin; Jen-Wei Huang; Foon Wu-Baer; Richard Baer; Vincenzo Costanzo; Alberto Ciccia
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 19.328

10.  (5'S) 5',8-Cyclo-2'-Deoxyadenosine Cannot Stop BER. Clustered DNA Lesion Studies.

Authors:  Boleslaw T Karwowski
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.