| Literature DB >> 27034927 |
Einas Al-Eisa1, Asma Al-Rushud2, Ahmad Alghadir1, Shahnawaz Anwer3, Bashayer Al-Harbi2, Noha Al-Sughaier2, Noha Al-Yoseef2, Reem Al-Otaibi2, Hanadi Ali Al-Muhaysin2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy of using "Instagram application" with a "home-exercise program" as a motivational stimulus in improving physical activity (PA) adherence levels among female college students.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27034927 PMCID: PMC4789360 DOI: 10.1155/2016/1546013
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
The exercise motivation inventory-2 questionnaire.
| Subscales | Number of items | Sample questions |
|---|---|---|
| Stress management | 4 | To release tension |
| Revitalization | 3 | To recharge my batteries |
| Enjoyment | 4 | To enjoy the social aspects of exercising |
| Challenge | 4 | To give me personal challenges to face |
| Social Recognition | 4 | To gain recognition for my accomplishments |
| Affiliation | 4 | To spend time with friends |
| Competition | 4 | Because I like trying to win in physical activities |
| Health pressures | 3 | To help prevent an illness that runs in my family |
| Ill-health avoidance | 3 | To avoid ill-health |
| Positive health | 3 | To feel more healthy |
| Weight management | 4 | To help control my weight |
| Appearance | 4 | To improve my appearance |
| Strength and endurance | 4 | To get stronger |
| Nimbleness | 3 | To stay/become flexible |
Demographic data of the participants.
| Mean ± SD | Percentage (100%) | |
|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | ||
| 19 | 20.30 ± 0.96 | 20% |
| 20 | 47% | |
| 21 | 18% | |
| 22 | 15% | |
| Weight (kg) | 58.80 ± 13.04 | |
| Height (cm) | 158.1 ± 5.88 | |
| BMI (kg/m2) | ||
| Underweight <18.5 | 23.6 ± 4.72 | 12% |
| Normal 18.5–24.99 | 60% | |
| Overweight ≥25 | 18% | |
| Obese ≥30 | 3% |
Frequency and percentage of the extrinsic and intrinsic motivational factors.
| Motivational factors (subscale) | Number of items | Sample items | Frequency | Percentages |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stress management | 4 | Because it helps reduce tension | 7 | 12% |
| Revitalization | 3 | Because it makes me feel good | 0 | 0% |
| Enjoyment | 4 | Because I enjoy the feeling of exerting myself | 7 | 12% |
| Challenge | 4 | To give me goals to work toward | 7 | 12% |
| Social recognition | 4 | To show my worth to others | 1 | 2% |
| Affiliation | 4 | To spend time with friends | 0 | 0% |
| Competition | 4 | Because I like trying to win in PA | 2 | 3% |
| Health pressures | 3 | Because my doctor advised me to exercise | 1 | 2% |
| Ill-health avoidance | 3 | To prevent health problems | 21 | 36% |
| Positive health | 3 | To have a healthy body | 27 | 47% |
| Weight management | 4 | To stay slim | 18 | 31% |
| Appearance | 4 | To look more attractive | 11 | 19% |
| Strength & endurance | 4 | To increase my endurance | 13 | 22% |
| Nimbleness | 3 | To stay/become more agile | 16 | 28% |
| Total | 51 | 58 | 100% |
Difference between the participants in adherence to the activity program.
| Classification | Number of sessions | Control group | Intervention group |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nonadherent | 0–4 | 88% | 61% |
| 5–8 | 8% | 22% | |
| Adherent | ≥8 | 4% | 17% |
| Mean ± SD | 2.09 ± 2.29 | 3.83 ± 4.05 | |
|
| 0.04 | ||
Significant at P < 0.05.
Measuring the flexibility, effectiveness, and motivation of the activity program.
| Feedback of the program activity | Program was flexible | Program was effective | Program was motivating |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | 34 (72%) | 25 (53%) | 30 (64%) |
| No | 7 (15%) | 8 (17%) | 8 (17%) |
| Indifferent | 6 (13%) | 14 (30%) | 9 (19%) |
Reasons of nonadherence to the activity program.
| Reasons | Frequency (%) |
|---|---|
| Academic stress | 20 (42.5) |
| Not enough time | 12 (25.5) |
| Program is hard to perform | 4 (8.5) |
| Not motivated by program | 1 (2.1) |
| Others | 10 (21.3) |