Literature DB >> 23429637

Comparison of traditional versus mobile app self-monitoring of physical activity and dietary intake among overweight adults participating in an mHealth weight loss program.

Gabrielle M Turner-McGrievy1, Michael W Beets, Justin B Moore, Andrew T Kaczynski, Daheia J Barr-Anderson, Deborah F Tate.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Self-monitoring of physical activity (PA) and diet are key components of behavioral weight loss programs. The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between diet (mobile app, website, or paper journal) and PA (mobile app vs no mobile app) self-monitoring and dietary and PA behaviors.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study is a post hoc analysis of a 6-month randomized weight loss trial among 96 overweight men and women (body mass index (BMI) 25-45 kg/m(2)) conducted from 2010 to 2011. Participants in both randomized groups were collapsed and categorized by their chosen self-monitoring method for diet and PA. All participants received a behavioral weight loss intervention delivered via podcast and were encouraged to self-monitor dietary intake and PA.
RESULTS: Adjusting for randomized group and demographics, PA app users self-monitored exercise more frequently over the 6-month study (2.6±0.5 days/week) and reported greater intentional PA (196.4±45.9 kcal/day) than non-app users (1.2±0.5 days/week PA self-monitoring, p<0.01; 100.9±45.1 kcal/day intentional PA, p=0.02). PA app users also had a significantly lower BMI at 6 months (31.5±0.5 kg/m(2)) than non-users (32.5±0.5 kg/m(2); p=0.02). Frequency of self-monitoring did not differ by diet self-monitoring method (p=0.63); however, app users consumed less energy (1437±188 kcal/day) than paper journal users (2049±175 kcal/day; p=0.01) at 6 months. BMI did not differ among the three diet monitoring methods (p=0.20).
CONCLUSIONS: These findings point to potential benefits of mobile monitoring methods during behavioral weight loss trials. Future studies should examine ways to predict which self-monitoring method works best for an individual to increase adherence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23429637      PMCID: PMC3628067          DOI: 10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001510

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   4.497


  24 in total

Review 1.  Self-monitoring in weight loss: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Lora E Burke; Jing Wang; Mary Ann Sevick
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2011-01

2.  Is it time to abandon the food frequency questionnaire?

Authors:  Alan R Kristal; Ulrike Peters; John D Potter
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Evaluation of the revised physical activity readiness questionnaire in older adults.

Authors:  B J Cardinal; J Esters; M K Cardinal
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 5.411

Review 4.  Utility and validity of the eating behavior inventory in clinical obesity research: a review of the literature.

Authors:  P M O'Neil; S Rieder
Journal:  Obes Rev       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 9.213

5.  Using a personal digital assistant for self-monitoring influences diet quality in comparison to a standard paper record among overweight/obese adults.

Authors:  Sushama D Acharya; Okan U Elci; Susan M Sereika; Mindi A Styn; Lora E Burke
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2011-04

6.  The effect of electronic self-monitoring on weight loss and dietary intake: a randomized behavioral weight loss trial.

Authors:  Lora E Burke; Molly B Conroy; Susan M Sereika; Okan U Elci; Mindi A Styn; Sushama D Acharya; Mary A Sevick; Linda J Ewing; Karen Glanz
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 5.002

7.  Self-reported physical activity compared with maximal oxygen uptake.

Authors:  S F Siconolfi; T M Lasater; R C Snow; R A Carleton
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Validity and reliability of self-reported total energy expenditure using a novel instrument.

Authors:  Ylva Trolle Lagerros; Lorelei A Mucci; Rino Bellocco; Olof Nyrén; Olle Bälter; Katarina A Bälter
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 8.082

9.  Electronic feedback in a diet- and physical activity-based lifestyle intervention for weight loss: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Sara L Shuger; Vaughn W Barry; Xuemei Sui; Amanda McClain; Gregory A Hand; Sara Wilcox; Rebecca A Meriwether; James W Hardin; Steven N Blair
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2011-05-18       Impact factor: 6.457

10.  Adherence to a behavioral weight loss treatment program enhances weight loss and improvements in biomarkers.

Authors:  Sushama D Acharya; Okan U Elci; Susan M Sereika; Edvin Music; Mindi A Styn; Melanie Warziski Turk; Lora E Burke
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 2.711

View more
  125 in total

Review 1.  Current Science on Consumer Use of Mobile Health for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Lora E Burke; Jun Ma; Kristen M J Azar; Gary G Bennett; Eric D Peterson; Yaguang Zheng; William Riley; Janna Stephens; Svati H Shah; Brian Suffoletto; Tanya N Turan; Bonnie Spring; Julia Steinberger; Charlene C Quinn
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Interest in a Twitter-delivered weight loss program among women of childbearing age.

Authors:  Molly E Waring; Kristin L Schneider; Bradley M Appelhans; Tiffany A Moore Simas; Rui S Xiao; Matthew C Whited; Andrew M Busch; Martinus M Evans; Sherry L Pagoto
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  THE FUTURE OF MOBILE HEALTH APPLICATIONS AND DEVICES IN CARDIOVASCULAR HEALTH.

Authors:  Heval Mohamed Kelli; Bradley Witbrodt; Amit Shah
Journal:  Euro Med J Innov       Date:  2017-01-10

4.  Behavior Change.

Authors:  Angela L Duckworth; James J Gross
Journal:  Organ Behav Hum Decis Process       Date:  2020-12-10

Review 5.  Characteristics of Smartphone Applications for Nutrition Improvement in Community Settings: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Emma Tonkin; Julie Brimblecombe; Thomas Philip Wycherley
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 8.701

Review 6.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of mobile devices and weight loss with an intervention content analysis.

Authors:  Lynnette Nathalie Lyzwinski
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2014-06-30

7.  A Novel Diabetes Prevention Intervention Using a Mobile App: A Randomized Controlled Trial With Overweight Adults at Risk.

Authors:  Yoshimi Fukuoka; Caryl L Gay; Kevin L Joiner; Eric Vittinghoff
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2015-05-30       Impact factor: 5.043

Review 8.  Can mHealth Revolutionize the Way We Manage Adult Obesity?

Authors:  Niharika N Bhardwaj; Bezawit Wodajo; Keerthi Gochipathala; David P Paul; Alberto Coustasse
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2017-04-01

9.  Are we sure that Mobile Health is really mobile? An examination of mobile device use during two remotely-delivered weight loss interventions.

Authors:  Gabrielle M Turner-McGrievy; Deborah F Tate
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2014-02-02       Impact factor: 4.046

10.  Design and validation of a low cost, high-capacity weighing device for wheelchair users and bariatrics.

Authors:  Brandon A Sherrod; Dustin A Dew; Rebecca Rogers; James H Rimmer; Alan W Eberhardt
Journal:  Assist Technol       Date:  2016-07-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.