Literature DB >> 27034455

The Diabetes Telephone Study: Design and challenges of a pragmatic cluster randomized trial to improve diabetic peripheral neuropathy treatment.

Alyce S Adams1, Elizabeth A Bayliss2, Julie A Schmittdiel3, Andrea Altschuler3, Wendy Dyer3, Romain Neugebauer3, Marc Jaffe4, Joseph D Young5, Eileen Kim5, Richard W Grant3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Challenges to effective pharmacologic management of symptomatic diabetic peripheral neuropathy include the limited effectiveness of available medicines, frequent side effects, and the need for ongoing symptom assessment and treatment titration for maximal effectiveness. We present here the rationale and implementation challenges of the Diabetes Telephone Study, a randomized trial designed to improve medication treatment, titration, and quality of life among patients with symptomatic diabetic peripheral neuropathy.
METHODS: We implemented a pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial to test the effectiveness of an automated interactive voice response tool designed to provide physicians with real-time patient-reported data about responses to newly prescribed diabetic peripheral neuropathy medicines. A total of 1834 primary care physicians treating patients in the diabetes registry at Kaiser Permanente Northern California were randomized into the intervention or control arm. In September 2014, we began identification and recruitment of patients assigned to physicians in the intervention group who receive three brief interactive calls every 2 months after a medication is prescribed to alleviate diabetic peripheral neuropathy symptoms. These calls provide patients with the opportunity to report on symptoms, side effects, self-titration of medication dose and overall satisfaction with treatment. We plan to compare changes in self-reported quality of life between the intervention group and patients in the control group who receive three non-interactive automated educational phone calls.
RESULTS: Successful implementation of this clinical trial required robust stakeholder engagement to help tailor the intervention and to address pragmatic concerns such as provider time constraints. As of 27 October 2015, we had screened 2078 patients, 1447 of whom were eligible for participation. We consented and enrolled 1206 or 83% of those eligible. Among those enrolled, 53% are women and the mean age is 67 (standard deviation = 12) years. The racial ethnic make-up is 56% White, 8% Asian, 13% Black or African American, and 19% Hispanic or Latino.
CONCLUSION: Innovative strategies are needed to guide improvements in healthcare delivery for patients with symptomatic diabetic peripheral neuropathy. This trial aims to assess whether real-time collection and clinical feedback of patient treatment experiences can reduce patient symptom burden. Implementation of a clinical trial closely involving clinical care required researchers to partner with clinicians. If successful, this intervention provides a critical information feedback loop that would optimize diabetic peripheral neuropathy medication titration through widely available interactive voice response technology.
© The Author(s) 2016.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Diabetic peripheral neuropathy; quality of life; stakeholder engagement research; treatment titration

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27034455      PMCID: PMC7261503          DOI: 10.1177/1740774516631530

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Trials        ISSN: 1740-7745            Impact factor:   2.486


  25 in total

Review 1.  Evidence for risk of bias in cluster randomised trials: review of recent trials published in three general medical journals.

Authors:  Suezann Puffer; David Torgerson; Judith Watson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-10-04

2.  A structural approach to selection bias.

Authors:  Miguel A Hernán; Sonia Hernández-Díaz; James M Robins
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.822

Review 3.  Treating diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain.

Authors:  Tammy J Lindsay; Blake C Rodgers; Vincent Savath; Kevin Hettinger
Journal:  Am Fam Physician       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 3.292

Review 4.  Comparison of the minimally important difference for two health state utility measures: EQ-5D and SF-6D.

Authors:  Stephen J Walters; John E Brazier
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Implementation of an outpatient electronic health record and emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and office visits among patients with diabetes.

Authors:  Mary Reed; Jie Huang; Richard Brand; Ilana Graetz; Romain Neugebauer; Bruce Fireman; Marc Jaffe; Dustin W Ballard; John Hsu
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Cluster randomised trials: time for improvement. The implications of adopting a cluster design are still largely being ignored.

Authors:  M K Campbell; J M Grimshaw
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-10-31

7.  Outpatient electronic health records and the clinical care and outcomes of patients with diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Mary Reed; Jie Huang; Ilana Graetz; Richard Brand; John Hsu; Bruce Fireman; Marc Jaffe
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 8.  Painful diabetic neuropathy.

Authors:  Amanda Peltier; Stephen A Goutman; Brian C Callaghan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2014-05-06

9.  Improved blood pressure control associated with a large-scale hypertension program.

Authors:  Marc G Jaffe; Grace A Lee; Joseph D Young; Stephen Sidney; Alan S Go
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Predicting EuroQol (EQ-5D) scores from the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) global items and domain item banks in a United States sample.

Authors:  Dennis A Revicki; Ariane K Kawata; Neesha Harnam; Wen-Hung Chen; Ron D Hays; David Cella
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2009-05-27       Impact factor: 4.147

View more
  4 in total

1.  Study protocol: Using peer support to aid in prevention and treatment in prediabetes (UPSTART).

Authors:  Michele Heisler; Jeffrey Kullgren; Caroline Richardson; Shelley Stoll; Cristina Alvarado Nieves; Deanne Wiley; Tali Sedgwick; Alyce Adams; Monique Hedderson; Eileen Kim; Megan Rao; Julie A Schmittdiel
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 2.226

Review 2.  Routine provision of feedback from patient-reported outcome measurements to healthcare providers and patients in clinical practice.

Authors:  Chris Gibbons; Ian Porter; Daniela C Gonçalves-Bradley; Stanimir Stoilov; Ignacio Ricci-Cabello; Elena Tsangaris; Jaheeda Gangannagaripalli; Antoinette Davey; Elizabeth J Gibbons; Anna Kotzeva; Jonathan Evans; Philip J van der Wees; Evangelos Kontopantelis; Joanne Greenhalgh; Peter Bower; Jordi Alonso; Jose M Valderas
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-10-12

3.  Overcoming barriers to diabetic polyneuropathy management in primary care.

Authors:  Alyce S Adams; Brian Callaghan; Richard W Grant
Journal:  Healthc (Amst)       Date:  2016-12-07

4.  Automated symptom and treatment side effect monitoring for improved quality of life among adults with diabetic peripheral neuropathy in primary care: a pragmatic, cluster, randomized, controlled trial.

Authors:  A S Adams; J A Schmittdiel; A Altschuler; E A Bayliss; R Neugebauer; L Ma; W Dyer; J Clark; B Cook; D Willyoung; M Jaffe; J D Young; E Kim; J M Boggs; L A Prosser; E Wittenberg; B Callaghan; M Shainline; R M Hippler; R W Grant
Journal:  Diabet Med       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 4.359

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.