Literature DB >> 9794847

Cluster randomised trials: time for improvement. The implications of adopting a cluster design are still largely being ignored.

M K Campbell, J M Grimshaw.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  1998        PMID： 9794847      PMCID： PMC1114151          DOI： 10.1136/bmj.317.7167.1171

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN： 0959-8138


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

Review 1.  Multilevel models: applications to health data.

Authors:  N Rice; A Leyland
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  1996-07

2.  Analysis of a trial randomised in clusters.

Authors:  S M Kerry; J M Bland
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-01-03

3.  Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement.

Authors:  C Begg; M Cho; S Eastwood; R Horton; D Moher; I Olkin; R Pitkin; D Rennie; K F Schulz; D Simel; D F Stroup
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-08-28       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 4.  The intracluster correlation coefficient in cluster randomisation.

Authors:  S M Kerry; J M Bland
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-05-09

5.  The unit of analysis error in studies about physicians' patient care behavior.

Authors:  G W Divine; J T Brown; L M Frazier
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1992 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.128
  5 in total
  40 in total

Review 1.  Contamination in trials: is cluster randomisation the answer?

Authors:  D J Torgerson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-02-10

2.  Changing doctor prescribing behaviour.

Authors:  P S Gill; M Mäkelä; K M Vermeulen; N Freemantle; G Ryan; C Bond; T Thorsen; F M Haaijer-Ruskamp
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  1999-08

3.  Cluster randomised trials. Standardised approach to analysing and reporting these trials is misguided.

Authors:  N Freemantle; J Wood
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-05-08

Review 4.  Computer-generated patient education materials: do they affect professional practice? A systematic review.

Authors:  Shaun P Treweek; Claire Glenton; Andrew D Oxman; Alister Penrose
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  On the nature and analysis of clustered data.

Authors:  Stephen J Zyzanski; Susan A Flocke; L Miriam Dickinson
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.166

Review 6.  Design and analysis of group-randomized trials: a review of recent methodological developments.

Authors:  David M Murray; Sherri P Varnell; Jonathan L Blitstein
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Cluster randomised trials in maternal and child health: implications for power and sample size.

Authors:  R Reading; I Harvey; M Mclean
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.791

8.  Open Access Tubal aSsessment for the initial management of infertility in general practice (the OATS trial): a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Scott Wilkes; Alison Murdoch; Nick Steen; John Wilsdon; Greg Rubin
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  Association between availability and quality of health services in schools and reproductive health outcomes among students: a multilevel observational study.

Authors:  Simon Denny; Elizabeth Robinson; Catriona Lawler; Sue Bagshaw; Bridget Farrant; Fionna Bell; Dianne Dawson; Diana Nicholson; Mo Hart; Theresa Fleming; Shanthi Ameratunga; Terryann Clark; Maria Kekus; Jennifer Utter
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Comparison of Bayesian and classical methods in the analysis of cluster randomized controlled trials with a binary outcome: the Community Hypertension Assessment Trial (CHAT).

Authors:  Jinhui Ma; Lehana Thabane; Janusz Kaczorowski; Larry Chambers; Lisa Dolovich; Tina Karwalajtys; Cheryl Levitt
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 4.615
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.