OBJECTIVES: To refine mild cognitive impairment (MCI) diagnostic criteria, we examined progression to dementia using two approaches to identifying MCI. METHODS: A total of 1203 Framingham Heart Study participants were classified at baseline as cognitively normal or MCI (overall and four MCI subtypes) via conventional Petersen/Winblad criteria (single cognitive test impaired per domain, >1.5 SD below expectations) or Jak/Bondi criteria (two tests impaired per domain, >1 SD below norms). Cox proportional hazards models were constructed to examine the association between each MCI definition and incident dementia. RESULTS: The Petersen/Winblad criteria classified 34% of participants as having MCI while the Jak/Bondi criteria classified 24% as MCI. Over a mean follow-up of 9.7 years, 58 participants (5%) developed incident dementia. Both MCI criteria were associated with incident dementia [Petersen/Winblad: hazards ratio (HR) = 2.64; p-value=.0002; Jak/Bondi: HR=3.30; p-value <.0001]. When both MCI definitions were included in the same model, only the Jak/Bondi definition remained statistically significantly associated with incident dementia (HR=2.47; p-value=.008). Multi-domain amnestic and single domain non-amnestic MCI subtypes were significantly associated with incident dementia for both diagnostic approaches (all p-values <.01). CONCLUSIONS: The Jak/Bondi MCI criteria had a similar association with dementia as the conventional Petersen/Winblad MCI criteria, despite classifying ~30% fewer participants as having MCI. Further exploration of alternative methods to conventional MCI diagnostic criteria is warranted. (JINS, 2016, 22, 937-943).
OBJECTIVES: To refine mild cognitive impairment (MCI) diagnostic criteria, we examined progression to dementia using two approaches to identifying MCI. METHODS: A total of 1203 Framingham Heart Study participants were classified at baseline as cognitively normal or MCI (overall and four MCI subtypes) via conventional Petersen/Winblad criteria (single cognitive test impaired per domain, >1.5 SD below expectations) or Jak/Bondi criteria (two tests impaired per domain, >1 SD below norms). Cox proportional hazards models were constructed to examine the association between each MCI definition and incident dementia. RESULTS: The Petersen/Winblad criteria classified 34% of participants as having MCI while the Jak/Bondi criteria classified 24% as MCI. Over a mean follow-up of 9.7 years, 58 participants (5%) developed incident dementia. Both MCI criteria were associated with incident dementia [Petersen/Winblad: hazards ratio (HR) = 2.64; p-value=.0002; Jak/Bondi: HR=3.30; p-value <.0001]. When both MCI definitions were included in the same model, only the Jak/Bondi definition remained statistically significantly associated with incident dementia (HR=2.47; p-value=.008). Multi-domain amnestic and single domain non-amnestic MCI subtypes were significantly associated with incident dementia for both diagnostic approaches (all p-values <.01). CONCLUSIONS: The Jak/Bondi MCI criteria had a similar association with dementia as the conventional Petersen/Winblad MCI criteria, despite classifying ~30% fewer participants as having MCI. Further exploration of alternative methods to conventional MCI diagnostic criteria is warranted. (JINS, 2016, 22, 937-943).
Authors: Emily C Edmonds; Lisa Delano-Wood; Lindsay R Clark; Amy J Jak; Daniel A Nation; Carrie R McDonald; David J Libon; Rhoda Au; Douglas Galasko; David P Salmon; Mark W Bondi Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2014-05-22 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Emily H Trittschuh; Paul K Crane; Eric B Larson; Brenna Cholerton; Wayne C McCormick; Susan M McCurry; James D Bowen; Laura D Baker; Suzanne Craft Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2011 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: G C Román; T K Tatemichi; T Erkinjuntti; J L Cummings; J C Masdeu; J H Garcia; L Amaducci; J M Orgogozo; A Brun; A Hofman Journal: Neurology Date: 1993-02 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Rhoda Au; Sudha Seshadri; Philip A Wolf; Merrill Elias; Penelope Elias; Lisa Sullivan; Alexa Beiser; Ralph B D'Agostino Journal: Exp Aging Res Date: 2004 Oct-Dec Impact factor: 1.645
Authors: Emily C Edmonds; Alexandra J Weigand; Kelsey R Thomas; Joel Eppig; Lisa Delano-Wood; Douglas R Galasko; David P Salmon; Mark W Bondi Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2018-09 Impact factor: 2.892
Authors: Emily C Edmonds; Carrie R McDonald; Anisa Marshall; Kelsey R Thomas; Joel Eppig; Alexandra J Weigand; Lisa Delano-Wood; Douglas R Galasko; David P Salmon; Mark W Bondi Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2019-02-06 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Erin E Sundermann; Pauline Maki; Anat Biegon; Richard B Lipton; Michelle M Mielke; Mary Machulda; Mark W Bondi Journal: Neurology Date: 2019-10-09 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Kimberly D Mueller; Rebecca L Koscik; Lianlian Du; Davide Bruno; Erin M Jonaitis; Audra Z Koscik; Bradley T Christian; Tobey J Betthauser; Nathaniel A Chin; Bruce P Hermann; Sterling C Johnson Journal: Cortex Date: 2020-07-31 Impact factor: 4.027
Authors: Kelsey R Thomas; Emily C Edmonds; Joel S Eppig; Christina G Wong; Alexandra J Weigand; Katherine J Bangen; Amy J Jak; Lisa Delano-Wood; Douglas R Galasko; David P Salmon; Steven D Edland; Mark W Bondi Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2019-09-05 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Katherine J Bangen; Sarah R Preis; Lisa Delano-Wood; Philip A Wolf; David J Libon; Mark W Bondi; Rhoda Au; Charles DeCarli; Adam M Brickman Journal: Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord Date: 2018 Jan-Mar Impact factor: 2.703
Authors: Javier Oltra-Cucarella; Miriam Sánchez-SanSegundo; Darren M Lipnicki; Perminder S Sachdev; John D Crawford; José A Pérez-Vicente; Luis Cabello-Rodríguez; Rosario Ferrer-Cascales Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2018-05-10 Impact factor: 5.562