| Literature DB >> 27029337 |
Cinta Pegueroles1,2,3, Albert Ferrés-Coy4, Maria Martí-Solano5, Charles F Aquadro6, Marta Pascual1, Francesc Mestres1.
Abstract
Adaptation is defined as an evolutionary process allowing organisms to succeed in certain habitats or conditions. Chromosomal inversions have the potential to be key in the adaptation processes, since they can contribute to the maintenance of favoured combinations of adaptive alleles through reduced recombination between individuals carrying different inversions. We have analysed six genes (Pif1A, Abi, Sqd, Yrt, Atpα and Fmr1), located inside and outside three inversions of the O chromosome in European populations of Drosophila subobscura. Genetic differentiation was significant between inversions despite extensive recombination inside inverted regions, irrespective of gene distance to the inversion breakpoints. Surprisingly, the highest level of genetic differentiation between arrangements was found for the Atpα gene, which is located outside the O1 and O7 inversions. Two derived unrelated arrangements (O3+4+1 and O3+4+7) are nearly fixed for several amino acid substitutions at the Atpα gene that have been described to confer resistance in other species to the cardenolide ouabain, a plant toxin capable of blocking ATPases. Similarities in the Atpα variants, conferring ouabain resistance in both arrangements, may be the result of convergent substitution and be favoured in response to selective pressures presumably related to the presence of plants containing ouabain in the geographic locations where both inversions are present.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27029337 PMCID: PMC4815013 DOI: 10.1038/srep23754
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Nucleotide variation and divergence per chromosomal arrangement for the six genes studied.
| Gene | Pop | Arrangement | Singletons | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9 | 9 | 104 | 61 | 0.021 | 0.022 | 0.025 | 0.188 | |||
| 12 | 12 | 120 | 55 | 0.021 | 0.023 | 0.026 | 0.191 | |||
| 9 | 9 | 89 | 54 | 0.017 | 0.018 | 0.021 | 0.187 | |||
| 12 | 12 | 114 | 42 | 0.022 | 0.023 | 0.024 | 0.190 | |||
| 3 | 3 | 8 | 8 | 0.003 | 0.008 | 0.008 | 0.174 | |||
| 12 | 12 | 32 | 20 | 0.005 | 0.012 | 0.017 | 0.173 | |||
| 10 | 9 | 33 | 21 | 0.006 | 0.015 | 0.018 | 0.172 | |||
| 7 | 7 | 24 | 15 | 0.006 | 0.014 | 0.015 | 0.173 | |||
| 10 | 5 | 12 | 8 | 0.002 | 0.005 | 0.008 | 0.115 | |||
| 12 | 12 | 25 | 16 | 0.005 | 0.006 | 0.008 | 0.116 | |||
| 10 | 10 | 17 | 12 | 0.003 | 0.004 | 0.006 | 0.115 | |||
| 10 | 10 | 21 | 14 | 0.005 | 0.006 | 0.007 | 0.115 | |||
| 11 | 11 | 28 | 14 | 0.009 | 0.031 | 0.035 | 0.327 | |||
| 12 | 12 | 33 | 18 | 0.010 | 0.034 | 0.042 | 0.327 | |||
| 9 | 9 | 31 | 18 | 0.010 | 0.035 | 0.013 | 0.325 | |||
| 12 | 12 | 35 | 21 | 0.010 | 0.035 | 0.041 | 0.326 | |||
| 9 | 4 | 6 | 6 | 0.001 | 0.003 | 0.005 | 0.204 | |||
| 12 | 12 | 22 | 9 | 0.005 | 0.015 | 0.013 | 0.208 | |||
| 9 | 8 | 22 | 17 | 0.004 | 0.006 | 0.010 | 0.204 | |||
| 12 | 11 | 27 | 16 | 0.005 | 0.016 | 0.019 | 0.209 | |||
| 10 | 10 | 30 | 24 | 0.004 | 0.007 | 0.010 | 0.150 | |||
| 11 | 11 | 38 | 25 | 0.005 | 0.009 | 0.012 | 0.151 | |||
| 8 | 7 | 19 | 12 | 0.003 | 0.006 | 0.007 | 0.150 | |||
| 10 | 10 | 28 | 18 | 0.004 | 0.008 | 0.010 | 0.151 |
Pop, population: Mt. Parnes (MP) and Barcelona (BC); n, sample size; h, number of haplotypes; S, number of polymorphic sites; π, nucleotide diversity in all sites; πsil, nucleotide diversity in synonymous sites and non-coding positions; θsil, heterozygosity in silent sites; Ksil, divergence per silent site between D. subobscura and D. pseudoobscura.
Figure 2Genetic diversity (π) for the O, O and O chromosomal arrangements using the concatenated genes data set.
Grey boxes and solid lines underneath mark exonic and intronic regions, respectively.
F ST values for each gene and the concatenated set and the statistical significance of Snn (ns, not significant; 0.01 <*P < 0.05; 0.001 <**P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001).
| −0.028 ns | 0.146** | 0.076 ns | |
| – | 0.065* | – | |
| 0.082* | 0.040* | 0.071** | |
| 0.017 ns | −0.001 ns | 0.024 ns | |
| 0.614*** | 0.525** | 0.367*** | |
| −0.033 ns | 0.004 ns | −0.005 ns | |
| Concatenated | 0.099* | 0.182** | 0.092* |
Genes in grey are located inside inversions.
Figure 3(A) Percentage of significant LD among O, O and Oarrangements within and between genes. (B–D) Pairwise LD measured as R2 for O–O, O–O and O–O comparisons. Green dots correspond to the significant associations after adjusting for multiple comparisons using Benjamini and Hochberg method (1995). Gene order in O and O is the same (Fig. 1) and has been used for homogeneity in all comparisons.
Figure 4Amino acid replacements detected in the amplified region of the Atpα gene in 14 Drosophila species.
alow frequency amino acid (<0.3); bequal frequency amino acid. Numbering corresponds to the mature pig enzyme (GenBank #: 1 × 03938). Shading is as follows: Pale grey: amino acid changes that occurred in the O arrangement of D. subobscura or in any other Drosophila species. Dark grey: changes found only in the O and/or O arrangements in comparison to the other Drosophila species.
Figure 5(A) Structural model of the ATPase α-subunit. The gene region sequenced is depicted in cyan and ouabain in orange sticks. Pink spheres represent positions presenting variation between arrangements and green spheres show the ion positions derived from the crystal structure of the template. (B–D) Detailed view of mutations located in the transmembrane region of O, O and O arrangements. Hydrogen bonding interactions are represented as red dotted lines, while lack of these interactions is signalled with a red cross.