Literature DB >> 27171535

NIOSH field studies team assessment: Worker exposure to aerosolized metal oxide nanoparticles in a semiconductor fabrication facility.

Sara A Brenner1, Nicole M Neu-Baker1, Adrienne C Eastlake2, Catherine C Beaucham2, Charles L Geraci2.   

Abstract

The ubiquitous use of engineered nanomaterials-particulate materials measuring approximately 1-100 nanometers (nm) on their smallest axis, intentionally engineered to express novel properties-in semiconductor fabrication poses unique issues for protecting worker health and safety. Use of new substances or substances in a new form may present hazards that have yet to be characterized for their acute or chronic health effects. Uncharacterized or emerging occupational health hazards may exist when there is insufficient validated hazard data available to make a decision on potential hazard and risk to exposed workers under condition of use. To advance the knowledge of potential worker exposure to engineered nanomaterials, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Nanotechnology Field Studies Team conducted an on-site field evaluation in collaboration with on-site researchers at a semiconductor research and development facility on April 18-21, 2011. The Nanomaterial Exposure Assessment Technique (2.0) was used to perform a complete exposure assessment. A combination of filter-based sampling and direct-reading instruments was used to identify, characterize, and quantify the potential for worker inhalation exposure to airborne alumina and amorphous silica nanoparticles associated with th e chemical mechanical planarization wafer polishing process. Engineering controls and work practices were evaluated to characterize tasks that might contribute to potential exposures and to assess existing engineering controls. Metal oxide structures were identified in all sampling areas, as individual nanoparticles and agglomerates ranging in size from 60 nm to >1,000 nm, with varying structure morphology, from long and narrow to compact. Filter-based samples indicated very little aerosolized material in task areas or worker breathing zone. Direct-reading instrument data indicated increased particle counts relative to background in the wastewater treatment area; however, particle counts were very low overall, indicating a well-controlled working environment. Recommendations for employees handling or potentially exposed to engineered nanomaterials include hazard communication, standard operating procedures, conservative ventilation systems, and prevention through design in locations where engineered nanomaterials are used or stored, and routine air sampling for occupational exposure assessment and analysis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chemical mechanical planarization; NEAT 2.0; engineered nanomaterials; occupational exposure assessment; semiconductor fabrication; uncharacterized occupational health hazard

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27171535      PMCID: PMC5016214          DOI: 10.1080/15459624.2016.1183015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg        ISSN: 1545-9624            Impact factor:   2.155


  19 in total

1.  An occupational exposure assessment for engineered nanoparticles used in semiconductor fabrication.

Authors:  Michele Noble Shepard; Sara Brenner
Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg       Date:  2013-11-27

2.  Comparative cytotoxicity of Al2O3, CeO2, TiO2 and ZnO nanoparticles to human lung cells.

Authors:  In-Sun Kim; Miri Baek; Soo-Jin Choi
Journal:  J Nanosci Nanotechnol       Date:  2010-05

3.  Nanoparticle emission assessment technique (NEAT) for the identification and measurement of potential inhalation exposure to engineered nanomaterials--part A.

Authors:  M Methner; L Hodson; C Geraci
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.155

4.  SEM analysis of particle size during conventional treatment of CMP process wastewater.

Authors:  Gary A Roth; Nicole M Neu-Baker; Sara A Brenner
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 7.963

5.  Cytotoxicity and mitochondrial damage caused by silica nanoparticles.

Authors:  Lei Sun; Yang Li; Xiaomei Liu; Minghua Jin; Long Zhang; Zhongjun Du; Caixia Guo; Peili Huang; Zhiwei Sun
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  2011-06-24       Impact factor: 3.500

6.  Exposure assessment approaches for engineered nanomaterials.

Authors:  Linda C Abbott; Andrew D Maynard
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.000

7.  Determination of titanium dioxide in foods using inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry.

Authors:  M C Lomer; R P Thompson; J Commisso; C L Keen; J J Powell
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.616

8.  Size-dependent cytotoxicity of monodisperse silica nanoparticles in human endothelial cells.

Authors:  Dorota Napierska; Leen C J Thomassen; Virginie Rabolli; Dominique Lison; Laetitia Gonzalez; Micheline Kirsch-Volders; Johan A Martens; Peter H Hoet
Journal:  Small       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 13.281

9.  Oxidative stress and pro-inflammatory responses induced by silica nanoparticles in vivo and in vitro.

Authors:  Eun-Jung Park; Kwangsik Park
Journal:  Toxicol Lett       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 4.372

Review 10.  Nanotoxicology: an emerging discipline evolving from studies of ultrafine particles.

Authors:  Günter Oberdörster; Eva Oberdörster; Jan Oberdörster
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Occupational Exposures to Engineered Nanomaterials: a Review of Workplace Exposure Assessment Methods.

Authors:  Seth McCormick; Mamadou Niang; Matthew M Dahm
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2021-06-08

2.  Pro-Inflammatory and Pro-Fibrogenic Effects of Ionic and Particulate Arsenide and Indium-Containing Semiconductor Materials in the Murine Lung.

Authors:  Wen Jiang; Xiang Wang; Olivia J Osborne; Yingjie Du; Chong Hyun Chang; Yu-Pei Liao; Bingbing Sun; Jinhong Jiang; Zhaoxia Ji; Ruibin Li; Xiangsheng Liu; Jianqin Lu; Sijie Lin; Huan Meng; Tian Xia; André E Nel
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 15.881

3.  Results of the 2019 Survey of Engineered Nanomaterial Occupational Health and Safety Practices.

Authors:  Nicole M Neu-Baker; Adrienne Eastlake; Laura Hodson
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 4.614

4.  Exposure Assessment of Silver and Gold Nanoparticles Generated During the Synthesis Process in a South African Research Laboratory.

Authors:  Masilu D Masekameni; Charlene Andraos; Il Je Yu; Mary Gulumian
Journal:  Front Toxicol       Date:  2022-05-25

5.  Refinement of the Nanoparticle Emission Assessment Technique into the Nanomaterial Exposure Assessment Technique (NEAT 2.0).

Authors:  Adrienne C Eastlake; Catherine Beaucham; Kenneth F Martinez; Matthew M Dahm; Christopher Sparks; Laura L Hodson; Charles L Geraci
Journal:  J Occup Environ Hyg       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.155

6.  Exposures during wet production and use processes of nanomaterials: a summary of 11 worksite evaluations.

Authors:  Eric Glassford; Nicole M Neu-Baker; Kevin L Dunn; Kevin H Dunn
Journal:  Ind Health       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 2.179

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.