Literature DB >> 27025869

[Total and unicompartmental knee replacement. Patient-specific Instrumentation].

G Köster1, C Biró2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The objective of patient-specific instrumentation (PSI Zimmer®) technology is to optimize positioning and selection of components as well as surgical procedure in uni- and bicompartimental knee replacement. The article contains a description of the planning and surgical technique and evaluates the method based on own results and literature.
METHODS: Using MRI or CT scans a virtual 3D model of the joint is created in order to simulate and plan the implant positioning. According to these data, pin placement and/or cutting guides are produced, which enable the surgeon to transfer the planning to the surgical procedure. In a prospective comparative study 88 patients (44 per each of the two techniques) were operated by one surgeon receiving the same TKA using either MRI-based PSI or a conventional technique. The number of surgical trays, operating time, intraoperative changes and frontal alignment using a full leg x‑ray (70 cases) were compared. In 17 patients the method was applied with unicondylar knee replacement.
RESULTS: Anatomical abnormalities could be detected preoperatively and considered during the operation. With PSI the number of trays could be reduced and predictability of the component size was more precise. Intraoperative changes became necessary only for distal femoral (25 %) and proximal tibial (36 %) resection and tibial rotation (40 %). Alignment was more precise in the PSI cases DISCUSSION: PSI using the applied technique proved to be practicable and reliable. The advantages of precise planning became obvious. Results concerning alignment are inconsistent in the literature. Soft tissue balancing has only been included in the technique to a limited degree so far. PSI is still in an early stage of development and further development opportunities should be exploited before final assessment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computer-assisted Surgery; Magnetic resonance imaging; Osteoarthritis of knee; Total knee replacement; Unicondylar knee replacement

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27025869     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-016-3245-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  19 in total

1.  Effect of postoperative mechanical axis alignment on the fifteen-year survival of modern, cemented total knee replacements.

Authors:  Sebastien Parratte; Mark W Pagnano; Robert T Trousdale; Daniel J Berry
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  [Revision of unconstrained total knee arthroplasty - a technical analysis].

Authors:  C Haasper; D Kendoff; M Gebauer; T Gehrke; W Klauser
Journal:  Z Orthop Unfall       Date:  2012-06-21       Impact factor: 0.923

3.  Kinematically versus mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  H Gene Dossett; George J Swartz; Nicolette A Estrada; George W LeFevre; Bertram G Kwasman
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 1.390

Review 4.  Current data do not support routine use of patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Pramod B Voleti; Mathew J Hamula; Keith D Baldwin; Gwo-Chin Lee
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  The Chitranjan Ranawat award: is neutral mechanical alignment normal for all patients? The concept of constitutional varus.

Authors:  Johan Bellemans; William Colyn; Hilde Vandenneucker; Jan Victor
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Improved alignment and operating room efficiency with patient-specific instrumentation for TKA.

Authors:  Luc Renson; Pascal Poilvache; Hans Van den Wyngaert
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  The John Insall Award: No Functional Benefit After Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Performed With Patient-specific Instrumentation: A Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Matthieu Ollivier; Sebastien Parratte; Alexandre Lunebourg; Elke Viehweger; Jean-Noel Argenson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  A prospective randomised controlled study of patient-specific cutting guides compared with conventional instrumentation in total knee replacement.

Authors:  K Chareancholvanich; R Narkbunnam; C Pornrattanamaneewong
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 5.082

Review 9.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of patient-specific instrumentation for improving alignment of the components in total knee replacement.

Authors:  E Thienpont; P E Schwab; P Fennema
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 5.082

Review 10.  Systematic review of patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: new but not improved.

Authors:  Adam Sassoon; Denis Nam; Ryan Nunley; Robert Barrack
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  3 in total

1.  Revision of partial knee to total knee arthroplasty with use of patient-specific instruments results in acceptable femoral rotation.

Authors:  Martijn G M Schotanus; Elke Thijs; B Boonen; B Kerens; B Jong; Nanne P Kort
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Clinical applications and prospects of 3D printing guide templates in orthopaedics.

Authors:  Meng Meng; Jinzuo Wang; Tianze Sun; Wentao Zhang; Jing Zhang; Liming Shu; Zhonghai Li
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 4.889

3.  Is high tibial osteotomy better than proximal fibula osteotomy for treating knee osteoarthritis? A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical controlled trials.

Authors:  Hetao Huang; Sicong Huang; Guihong Liang; Lingfeng Zeng; Jianke Pan; Weiyi Yang; Hongyun Chen; Jun Liu; Biqi Pan
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.817

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.