Literature DB >> 27025867

[Evolution of total knee arthroplasty. From robotics and navigation to patient-specific instruments].

R Haaker1.   

Abstract

In this article the evolution beginning with the robotics of total knee arthroplasty to CT-based and kinematic navigation and patient-specific instruments is described. Thereby it is pointed out that in the early 1990s, CT imaging solely for the planning of a knee endoprosthesis was considered as obsolete radiation exposure and this led to the widespread development of kinematical systems.Also a patient specific planning tool based on CAD built acryl harz blocs existed at the time. There is an ongoing process of implanting total knee arthroplasties in a more exact position. Nowadays the new evolution of soft tissue balancing by using a kinematic alignment has put these efforts into perspective.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CT scan; Historical aspects; Joint prosthesis implantation; Robotics; Surgical procedures

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27025867     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-016-3238-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  9 in total

1.  [Computer-assisted navigated cup placement in primary and secondary dysplastic hips].

Authors:  R Haaker; K Tiedjen; F Rubenthaler; M Stockheim
Journal:  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb

2.  Computer-assisted navigation increases precision of component placement in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Rolf G Haaker; Martin Stockheim; Michael Kamp; Gunnar Proff; Johannes Breitenfelder; Andreas Ottersbach
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  [Optimization of cup positioning in THA--comparison between conventional mechanical instrumentation and computer-assisted implanted cups by using the orthopilot navigation system].

Authors:  A Ottersbach; R Haaker
Journal:  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec

4.  Hands-on robotic unicompartmental knee replacement: a prospective, randomised controlled study of the acrobot system.

Authors:  J Cobb; J Henckel; P Gomes; S Harris; M Jakopec; F Rodriguez; A Barrett; B Davies
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2006-02

5.  Comparison of conventional versus computer-navigated acetabular component insertion.

Authors:  Rolf G A Haaker; Kai Tiedjen; Andreas Ottersbach; Frank Rubenthaler; Marthin Stockheim; James B Stiehl
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  [Minimally invasive unicondylar knee replacement with computer navigation].

Authors:  R G Haaker; M Wojciechowski; P Patzer; R E Willburger; M Senkal; M Engelhardt
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  How precise can bony landmarks be determined on a CT scan of the knee?

Authors:  J Victor; D Van Doninck; L Labey; B Innocenti; P M Parizel; J Bellemans
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2009-02-05       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  [Intraoperative control of pedicle screw position using three-dimensional fluoroscopy. A prospective study in thoracolumbar fractures].

Authors:  M Beck; K Moritz; P Gierer; G Gradl; C Harms; T Mittlmeier
Journal:  Z Orthop Unfall       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 0.923

9.  Navigation and CAS: is D-day approaching?

Authors:  Johan Bellemans
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.342

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.