Literature DB >> 27025502

Do Arabic numerals activate magnitude automatically? Evidence from the psychological refractory period paradigm.

Natalie Ford1, Michael G Reynolds2.   

Abstract

A single experiment (N = 30) tested the claim that Arabic numerals automatically activate their magnitude representations by assessing whether central attention is required in order to activate magnitude within the psychological refractory period (PRP) paradigm. Subjects performed a color discrimination task as Task 1 and a parity judgment task as Task 2. Task overlap was controlled by varying stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA). A spatial-numerical association of response codes (SNARC) effect arose in Task 2 and yielded under-additive effects with decreasing SOA. This result suggests that magnitude is activated prior to central attention, and is therefore consistent with the claim that numerals activate magnitude automatically.

Keywords:  Attention; Automaticity; Mathematical cognition; Psychological refractory period paradigm

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27025502     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-016-1020-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  27 in total

1.  A dual-task investigation of automaticity in visual word processing.

Authors:  R S McCann; R W Remington; M Van Selst
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Number processing induces spatial performance biases.

Authors:  M H Fischer
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2001-09-11       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 3.  A central capacity sharing model of dual-task performance.

Authors:  Michael Tombu; Pierre Jolicoeur
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Perceiving numbers causes spatial shifts of attention.

Authors:  Martin H Fischer; Alan D Castel; Michael D Dodd; Jay Pratt
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  The SNARC effect: an instance of the Simon effect?

Authors:  Daniela Mapelli; Elena Rusconi; Carlo Umiltà
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2003-07

6.  Moving the eyes along the mental number line: comparing SNARC effects with saccadic and manual responses.

Authors:  Wolf Schwarz; Inge M Keus
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2004-05

7.  A working memory account for spatial-numerical associations.

Authors:  Jean-Philippe van Dijck; Wim Fias
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2011-01-22

8.  Are processing limitations of visual attention and response selection subject to the same bottleneck in dual-tasks?

Authors:  Christina B Reimer; Tilo Strobach; Peter A Frensch; Torsten Schubert
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  The impact of verbal working memory on number-space associations.

Authors:  Véronique Ginsburg; Jean-Philippe van Dijck; Paola Previtali; Wim Fias; Wim Gevers
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Parsing a cognitive task: a characterization of the mind's bottleneck.

Authors:  Mariano Sigman; Stanislas Dehaene
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2005-02-08       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  3 in total

1.  Is semantic activation from print capacity limited? Evidence from the psychological refractory period paradigm.

Authors:  Derek Besner; Michael Reynolds
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-06

2.  Time dependency of the SNARC effect for different number formats: evidence from saccadic responses.

Authors:  Alexandra Pressigout; Agnès Charvillat; Karima Mersad; Karine Doré-Mazars
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-04-09

3.  Processing symbolic magnitude information conveyed by number words and by scalar adjectives.

Authors:  Arnold R Kochari; Herbert Schriefers
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 2.143

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.