Literature DB >> 27023636

Hip and knee arthroplasty implants contraindicated in obesity.

J D Craik1, M D Bircher1, M Rickman1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: High patient weight is a risk factor for mechanical implant failure and some manufacturers list obesity as a contraindication for implant use. We reviewed data from the 2012-2013 UK National Joint Registry to determine whether surgical practice reflects these manufacturer recommendations.
METHODS: The product literature for the most commonly used hip and knee implants was reviewed for recommendations against use in obese patients (body mass index [BMI] ≥ 30kg/m(2)). The total number of obese patients undergoing hip and knee arthroplasty was calculated, as was the proportion receiving implants against manufacturer recommendations.
RESULTS: Out of 200,054 patient records, 147,691 (74%) had a recorded BMI. The mean BMI for patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty was 29kg/m(2), compared with 31kg/m(2) for total knee arthroplasty. Of the 25 components reviewed, 5 listed obesity as a contraindication or recommended against implant use in obese patients. A total of 10,745 patients (16% of all obese patients) received implants against manufacturer recommendations.
CONCLUSIONS: A high proportion of patients are receiving implants against manufacturer recommendations. However, there are limitations to using BMI for stratifying risk of implant fatigue failure and manufacturers should therefore provide more detailed guidelines on size specific implant load limits to facilitate surgical decisions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthroplasty; Hip; Implant; Knee; Obesity; Prosthesis

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27023636      PMCID: PMC5227026          DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2016.0103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  45 in total

1.  Fatigue failure of the femoral component of a cementless total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  C V J Morgan-Hough; A Tavakkolizadeh; S Purkayastha
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Relationship of body mass index to early complications in knee replacement surgery.

Authors:  A D Patel; M Albrizio
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2007-05-24       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 3.  Fatigue fracture of a short stem hip replacement: a failure analysis with electron microscopy and review of the literature.

Authors:  Bernd A Ishaque; Henning Stürz; Erhan Basad
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2011-04-16       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Does body mass index affect clinical outcome post-operatively and at five years after primary unilateral total hip replacement performed for osteoarthritis? A multivariate analysis of prospective data.

Authors:  A M Davis; A M Wood; A C M Keenan; I J Brenkel; J A Ballantyne
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2011-09

5.  Higher body mass index leads to longer operative time in total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Barthelemy Liabaud; David A Patrick; Jeffrey A Geller
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  The influence of body mass index on life quality and clinical improvement after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Zi-ji Zhang; Xiao-yi Zhao; Yan Kang; Zhi-qi Zhang; Zi-bo Yang; Ai-shan He; Ming Fu; Pu-yi Sheng; Wei-ming Liao
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 1.601

7.  Prevalence of modifiable surgical site infection risk factors in hip and knee joint arthroplasty patients at an urban academic hospital.

Authors:  Jason S Pruzansky; Michael J Bronson; Ronald P Grelsamer; Elton Strauss; Calin S Moucha
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Patellofemoral complications following total knee arthroplasty. Correlation with implant design and patient risk factors.

Authors:  W L Healy; S A Wasilewski; R Takei; M Oberlander
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  The effect of body mass index on the risk of post-operative complications during the 6 months following total hip replacement or total knee replacement surgery.

Authors:  G Wallace; A Judge; D Prieto-Alhambra; F de Vries; N K Arden; C Cooper
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2014-05-13       Impact factor: 6.576

10.  Influence of body mass index (BMI) on functional improvements at 3 years following total knee replacement: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Paul Baker; Karthikeyan Muthumayandi; Craig Gerrand; Benjamin Kleim; Karen Bettinson; David Deehan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  4 in total

1.  Deformation of the Titanium Plate Stabilizing the Lateral Ankle Fracture Due to Its Overloading in Case of the Young, Obese Patient: Case Report Including the Biomechanical Analysis.

Authors:  Grzegorz Szczęsny; Mateusz Kopec; Tomasz Szolc; Zbigniew L Kowalewski; Paweł Małdyk
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-16

2.  Postoperative complications in underweight patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty: A comparative analysis to normal weight patients.

Authors:  Mikhail Zusmanovich; Benjamin Kester; James Feng; Ran Schwarzkopf
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2018-02-21

Review 3.  Total Hip Arthroplasty in the Obese Patient: Tips and Tricks and Review of the Literature.

Authors:  John-Henry Rhind; Camilla Baker; Philip John Roberts
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 1.251

Review 4.  EFORT recommendations for off-label use, mix & match and mismatch in hip and knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Keith Tucker; Klaus-Peter Günther; Per Kjaersgaard-Andersen; Jörg Lützner; Jan Philippe Kretzer; Rob G H H Nelissen; Toni Lange; Luigi Zagra
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2021-11-19
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.