| Literature DB >> 27023518 |
Xiaolei Li1,2, Qianhui Zhang3, Kai Fan4, Baiyan Li5, Huifeng Li6, Hanping Qi7, Jing Guo8, Yonggang Cao9, Hongli Sun10.
Abstract
(1)Entities:
Keywords: TRPV3; [Ca2+]i; cell cycle; non-small cell lung cancer; proliferation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27023518 PMCID: PMC4848893 DOI: 10.3390/ijms17040437
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Expression of TRPV3 in human NSCLCS. Immunohistochemical staining of TRPV3 was examined in cancerous tissues and their corresponding paracancerous tissues. Brown grains represented positive signals. The positive expression site of TRPV3 was mainly localized in the cell membrane and cytoplasm of tumor cells. TRPV3 negative expression was in paracancerous tissue (Para) (A,B), and TRPV3 positive expression was in lung squamous cell carcinoma (Sq) (C,D) and lung adenocarcinoma (Ad) (E,F). (A,C,E) 200×; and (B,D,F) 400×. The expression of TRPV3 in lung Ad, lung Sq, and Para (G) was determined by Western blot. Each bar represents the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. ** p < 0.01 compared with paracancerous tissue.
Association of TRPV3 expression in NSCLC with clinical and pathologic factors.
| Features | Patients | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | ||||
| <60 | 48 | 30 (62.5%) | 18 (37.5%) | 0.275 |
| ≥60 | 48 | 35 (72.9%) | 13 (27.1%) | |
| Gender | ||||
| Male | 55 | 38 (69.1%) | 17 (30.9%) | 0.737 |
| Female | 41 | 27 (65.9%) | 14 (34.1%) | |
| Smoke | ||||
| Yes | 49 | 33 (67.3%) | 16 (32.7%) | 0.938 |
| No | 47 | 32 (68.1%) | 15 (31.9%) | |
| Histology | ||||
| Adenocarcinoma | 56 | 35 (62.5%) | 21 (37.5%) | 0.197 |
| Squamous Cell | 40 | 30 (75.0%) | 10 (25.0%) | |
| Carcinoma differentiation | ||||
| Well | 45 | 23 (51.1%) | 22 (48.9%) | 0.001 * |
| Moderate-Poor | 51 | 42 (82.4%) | 9 (17.6%) | |
| TNM stage | ||||
| I/II | 61 | 35 (57.4%) | 26 (42.6%) | 0.004 * |
| III/IV | 35 | 30 (85.7%) | 5 (14.3%) | |
| Angiolymphatic invasion | ||||
| No | 54 | 34 (63.0%) | 20 (37.0%) | 0.260 |
| Yes | 42 | 31 (73.8%) | 11 (26.2%) | |
* p < 0.05.
Figure 2The Kaplan–Meier survival curves. Kaplan–Meier curves for cum survival rates according to TRPV3 expression status (p = 0.020) in NSCLC. Statistical differences were calculated through log-rank comparisons.
Figure 3The effect of TRPV3 on lung cancer cell proliferation. The effect of RuR (1–40 µM) on A549 and H1299 cells after 24 h was analyzed by MTT (A); data are expressed as mean ± SD of triplicates. * p < 0.05 compared with control group; ** p < 0.01 compared with control group. A549 and H1299 cells were treated with TRPV3-specific siRNA for 24 h. Western blot of TRPV3 depletion efficiency in A549 and H1299 cells (B); cell growth rate was analyzed in A549 and H1299 cells treated with 20 µM RuR or TRPV3-specific siRNA by MTT (C) and colony formation assay (D). Data are expressed as mean ± SD of triplicates. ## p < 0.01 compared with control group; ** p < 0.01 compared with NC group.
Figure 4Measurement of [Ca2+]i in A549 and H1299 cells. Fluorescent intensity in [Ca2+]i was recorded by laser scanning confocal microscope in different treatments (400×) (A); Western blot assay for p-CaMKII expression in A549 and H1299 cells (B). All data were expressed as mean ± SD of triplicates. p < 0.05 compared with control group; p < 0.01 compared with control group; * p < 0.05 compared with NC group; ** p < 0.01 compared with NC group.
Figure 5The effects of TRPV3 on A549 and H1299 cell cycle kinetics. Cell cycle phase was determined from the incorporation of propidium iodide (PI). Cells were analyzed 24 h after plating by flow cytometry (A); Western blot analysis of a series of cell cycle related factors showed the protein levels were changed (B). All data were expressed as mean ± SD of triplicates. # p < 0.05 compared with control group;* p < 0.05 compared with NC group.