| Literature DB >> 27023514 |
Muhammad Azizan Samad1, Siti Hajar Hashim2, Khanom Simarani3, Jamilah Syafawati Yaacob4,5.
Abstract
Phoenix dactylifera or date palm fruits are reported to contain natural compounds that exhibit antioxidant and antibacterial properties. This research aimed to study the effect of fruit chilling at 4 °C for 8 weeks, extract storage at -20 °C for 5 weeks, and extraction solvents (methanol or acetone) on total phenolic content (TPC), antioxidant activity and antibacterial properties of Saudi Arabian P. dactylifera cv Mabroom, Safawi and Ajwa, as well as Iranian P. dactylifera cv Mariami. The storage stability of total anthocyanin content (TAC) was also evaluated, before and after storing the extracts at -20 °C and 4 °C respectively, for 5 weeks. Mariami had the highest TAC (3.18 ± 1.40 mg cyd 3-glu/100 g DW) while Mabroom had the lowest TAC (0.54 ± 0.15 mg cyd 3-glu/100 g DW). The TAC of all extracts increased after storage. The chilling of date palm fruits for 8 weeks prior to solvent extraction elevated the TPC of all date fruit extracts, except for methanolic extracts of Mabroom and Mariami. All IC50 values of all cultivars decreased after the fruit chilling treatment. Methanol was a better solvent compared to acetone for the extraction of phenolic compounds in dates. The TPC of all cultivars extracts decreased after 5 weeks of extract storage. IC50 values of all cultivars extracts increased after extract storage except for the methanolic extracts of Safawi and Ajwa. Different cultivars exhibited different antibacterial properties. Only the methanolic extract of Ajwa exhibited antibacterial activity against all four bacteria tested: Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus cereus, Serratia marcescens and Escherichia coli. These results could be useful to the nutraceutical and pharmaceutical industries in the development of natural compound-based products.Entities:
Keywords: Phoenix dactylifera; antibacterial activity; antioxidant activity; storage; total anthocyanin content; total phenolic content
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27023514 PMCID: PMC6273234 DOI: 10.3390/molecules21040419
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Effect of extraction solvent on TPC (mg GAE/100 g DW) and IC50 (μg/mL) of different P. dactylifera cultivars. Values are the mean ± standard error of a minimum of three samples. The mean with different letters or symbols differs significantly at p < 0.05 (subject to different cultivars).
Effects of fruit chilling at 4 °C prior to extraction on the total phenolic content, TPC (mg GAE/100 g DW) in fruits of four different P. dactylifera cultivars were extracted using different solvents.
| Cultivar | Solvent | TPC (mg GAE/ 100 g DW) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Week 0 | Week 8 | ||
| Mabroom | Methanol | 16.48 ± 0.07 b | 10.28 ± 0.04 a |
| Acetone | 2.85 ± 0.11 a | 7.99 ± 0.36 b | |
| Safawi | Methanol | 5.76 ± 0.10 a | 7.12 ± 0.02 b |
| Acetone | 1.96 ± 0.07 a | 6.23 ± 0.00 b | |
| Ajwa | Methanol | 5.78 ± 0.03 a | 13.51 ± 0.12 b |
| Acetone | 2.69 ± 0.08 a | 4.21 ± 0.02 b | |
| Mariami | Methanol | 24.53 ± 0.74 b | 2.36 ± 0.11 a |
| Acetone | 8.25 ± 0.20 a | 13.17 ± 0.36 b | |
Values are the mean ± standard error of a minimum of three samples. The mean with different letters in a row differed significantly at p < 0.05.
Effect of fruit chilling at 4 °C prior to extraction on IC50 (μg/mL) in fruits of four P. dactylifera cultivars extracted using different solvents.
| Cultivar | Solvent | IC50 (μg/mL) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Week 0 | Week 8 | ||
| Mabroom | Methanol | 2282.88 ± 43.19 c | 1379.24 ± 40.75 b |
| Acetone | 1512.68 ± 42.76 c | 1323.17 ± 74.63 b | |
| Safawi | Methanol | 2306.90 ± 12.07 b | 2179.67 ± 157.36 b |
| Acetone | 3552.33 ± 98.38 c | 451.67 ± 11.67 b | |
| Ajwa | Methanol | 1722.09 ± 103.75 c | 1377.33 ± 66.74 b |
| Acetone | 1970.97 ± 2.65 c | 53.80 ± 1.31 a | |
| Mariami | Methanol | 1860.76 ± 9.79 c | 1188.95 ± 2.79 b |
| Acetone | 1250.79 ± 17.06 c | 130.77 ± 2.62 b | |
Values are the mean ± standard error of a minimum of three samples. The mean with different letters in a row differed significantly at p < 0.05.
Figure 2Effect of extract storage at −20 °C on TPC (mg GAE/100 g DW) of four different P. dactylifera cultivars, extracted using different solvents; (a) extraction using methanol, (b) extraction using acetone. Values are the mean ± standard error of a minimum of three samples. The means with different letters on a bar differed significantly at p < 0.05 (subject to different cultivars).
Effect of chilled fruits extract storage at −20 °C on IC50 (μg/mL) of different P. dactylifera extracted using different solvents.
| Cultivar | Solvent | IC50 (μg/mL) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Week 0 | Week 5 | ||
| Mabroom | Methanol | 1379.24 ± 40.75 b | 1412.74 ± 47.35 b |
| Acetone | 1323.17 ± 74.63 b | 2476.12 ± 1.00 c | |
| Safawi | Methanol | 2179.67 ± 157.36 c | 152.66 ± 3.53 b |
| Acetone | 451.67 ± 11.67 b | 577.20 ± 51.95 c | |
| Ajwa | Methanol | 1377.33 ± 66.74 c | 1121.67 ± 27.98 b |
| Acetone | 53.80 ± 1.31 a | 1385.50 ± 8.89 c | |
| Mariami | Methanol | 1188.95 ± 2.79 b | 1190.28 ± 56.00 b |
| Acetone | 130.77 ± 2.62 b | 2280.08 ± 5.33 c | |
Values are the mean ± standard error of a minimum of three samples. The means with different letters in a row differed significantly at p < 0.05.
Figure 3Effect of storage temperature (−20 °C and 4 °C) on the stability of anthocyanin content in different P. dactylifera cultivars, after 5 weeks. Values are the mean ± standard error of a minimum of three samples. The means with different letters and/or symbols differed significantly at p < 0.05 (subject to different cultivars).
The pH of different P. dactylifera cultivars methanolic extracts after 5 weeks of storage at different temperatures.
| Treatment (Storage Temperature) | pH | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mabroom | Safawi | Ajwa | Mariami | |
| Initial | 6.40 | 6.32 | 6.38 | 6.46 |
| −20 °C | 5.86 | 5.75 | 5.83 | 5.96 |
| 4 °C | 1.69 | 1.76 | 1.59 | 1.62 |
Effect of different treatments on the diameter (mm) of the inhibition zone of different bacteria.
| Gram | Bacteria | Treatment | Diameter of Inhibition Zone (mm) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mabroom | Safawi | Ajwa | Mariami | |||
| dH2O | ND | ND | ND | ND | ||
| Amp | 15.8 ± 0.3 d | 6.3 ± 0.3 a | 6.5 ± 0.3 c | 16.3 ± 0.9 c | ||
| A | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Ma | 0.3 ± 0.3 a | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Mb | 3.3 ± 1.7 b | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Mc | 4.2 ± 0.8 b | 0 | 1.0 ± 0.3 a | 2.7 ± 2.7 a | ||
| Md | 10.0 ± 0.6 c | 0 | 2.0 ± 0.7 a | 9.5 ± 0.3 b | ||
| Me | 15.3 ± 0.3 d | 0 | 4.0 ± 1.5 b | 17.5 ± 0.3 c | ||
| dH2O | ND | ND | ND | ND | ||
| Amp | 7.3 ± 0.3 a | 9.0 ± 0.5 b | 6.8 ± 0.6 b | 6.7 ± 0.3 a | ||
| A | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Ma | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Mb | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Mc | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Md | 0 | 1.3 ± 0.6 a | 1.0 ± 0.3 a | 0 | ||
| Me | 13.5 ± 1.5 b | 1.3 ± 0.6 a | 2.0 ± 0.7 a | 5.0 ± 5.0 a | ||
| dH2O | ND | ND | ND | ND | ||
| Tet | 11.0 ± 1.7 | 5.7 ± 0.7 b | 7.3 ± 0.3 b | 10.7 ± 1.2 | ||
| A | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Ma | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Mb | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Mc | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Md | 0 | 1.0 ± 0.0 a | 1.0 ± 0.3 a | 0 | ||
| Me | 0 | 1.0 ± 0.3 a | 1.0 ± 0.3 a | 0 | ||
| dH2O | ND | ND | ND | ND | ||
| Tet | 10.0 ± 0.0 | 8.3 ± 0.9 a | 12.7 ± 1.5 b | 15.7 ± 9.1 | ||
| A | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Ma | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Mb | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| Mc | 0 | 0 | 3.0 ± 0.0 a | 0 | ||
| Md | 0 | 0 | 5.5 ± 0.3 a | 0 | ||
Values are the mean ± standard error of a minimum of three samples. The mean with different letters in a column differed significantly at p < 0.05 (subject to different bacteria). dH2O: distilled water, Amp: 100 mg/mL ampicillin, Tet: 30 μg/disc tetracycline, A: 100 mg/mL acetone extract, Ma: 100 mg/mL methanolic extract, Mb: 200 mg/mL methanolic extract, Mc: 300 mg/mL methanolic extract, Md: 400 mg/mL methanolic extract, Me: 500 mg/mL methanolic extract, ND: not detected.