| Literature DB >> 31726677 |
M Iftikhar Hussain1, Mohammad H Semreen2,3, Abdallah Shanableh1,4, Muhammad Nasir Khan Khattak5, Ismail Saadoun5, Islam M Ahmady5, Muath Mousa4, Nora Darwish4, Wameed Radeef4, Sameh S M Soliman2,3.
Abstract
The biochemical composition, secondary metabolites (phenolic compounds, flavonoids) and antimicrobial potential of different varieties of Emirati date (Phoenix dactylifera L.) pits were investigated. Total phenolic acids (TPC) and total flavonoid contents (TFC) of the different date pits were measured using a Folin-Ciocalteau reagent. Different organic solvents [(n-hexane; H2O: EtOH (1:1); ethyl acetate; acetone: Water (1:1); and methanol: Chloroform (1:1)] were compared to evaluate the phytotoxicity of Ajwa, Fard, Khalas, Khodari, Abu Maan, Lulu, and Mabroom date pits. The antimicrobial activity of the date pit extracts were evaluated by means of agar-well diffusion assay on Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 29123), Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922) and Candida albicans (ATCC 66027). Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were measured following clinical laboratory standardization institute (CLSI) protocol. The biochemical analyses of date pits indicate that TPC were ranged from 7.80 mg of equivalent gallic acid/100 g dry weight in Ajwa to 4.65 mg in Mabroom. The TFC were ranged between 1.6-4.54 mg of equivalent catechin/100 g dry weight. Ajwa pit extract showed good quality traits (higher protein, lower ash content, and intermediate dietary fiber). The results indicate that the ethyl acetate extract of Khalas and Khodari inhibited S. aureus with an inhibition zone diameter of 20 mm and MIC of 10 mg/mL. Abu Mann pit extract inhibited the S. aureus and also decreased the population of E. coli. The diameter of inhibition zone was 15, 16, and 18 mm after treatment with Ajwa extracts, while the MICs were 7.5 and 5 mg/mL. The MeOH: CFM extract of Abu Mann and Ajwa was more potent against E. coli bacteria than any other extract. This work demonstrates that the Emirati date pits extract has antimicrobial (antibacterial, antifungal) potential and can be used as phytotoxic natural compounds.Entities:
Keywords: Phoenix dactylifera L.; antibacterial activity; antifungal activity; flavonoid content; phenolic content
Year: 2019 PMID: 31726677 PMCID: PMC6918346 DOI: 10.3390/plants8110497
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
Biochemical composition (proximate analysis and dietary fiber) of six date palm pits.
| Date Palm Variety | Moisture | Fats | Protein | Ash | Carbohydrates | Dietary Fiber |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Khalas | 16.28 ± 0.25 a | 10.24 ± 0.04 b | 5.21 ± 0.06 c | 0.15 ± 0.12 b | 4.80 ± 0.06 a | 72.74 ± 0.10 c |
| Lulu | 11.14 ± 0.06 c | 8.45 ± 0.22 c | 6.25 ± 0.10 b | 1.45 ± 0.05 a | 3.20 ± 0.14 b | 70.10 ± 0.20 d |
| Fard | 9.72 ± 0.20 e | 10.72 ± 0.10 b | 5.74 ± 0.14 c | 0.50 ± 0.22 b | 3.40 ± 0.10 b | 70.25 ± 0.24 d |
| Ajwa | 10.6 ± 0.04 d | 10.45 ± 0.06 b | 8.62 ± 0.06 a | 0.74 ± 0.10 b | 2.80 ± 0.10 c | 74.60 ± 0.18 b |
| Abu Maan | 10.32 ± 0.14 d | 8.25 ± 0.04 c | 5.67 ± 0.14 c | 1.80 ± 0.26 a | 3.20 ± 0.20 b | 75.50 ± 0.13 a |
| Mabroom | 12.44 ± 0.10 b | 12.57 ± 0.10 a | 6.2 ± 0.20 b | 1.24 ± 0.04 a | 2.10 ± 0.22 c | 68.04 ± 0.15 e |
Data are expressed as mean ± S.D. (n = 3) on a dry weight basis. Means ± SD followed by the same letter, within a column, are not significantly different (p > 0.05).
Total phenolic contents and total flavonoid in six date palm varieties pits (dry weight basis).
| Date Palm Variety | Total Phenolic Content (mg GAE/100 g dw) | Total Flavonoid Contents (mg CEQ/100 g dw) |
|---|---|---|
| Khalas | 7.28 ± 0.02 a | 4.30 ± 0.02 a |
| Lulu | 6.40 ± 0.03 b | 2.70 ± 0.04 c |
| Fard | 6.10 ± 0.020 b | 1.60 ± 0.01 d |
| Ajwa | 7.80 ± 0.05 a | 4.54 ± 0.0 a |
| Abu Maan | 5.00 ± 0.01 c | 3.80 ± 0.10 b |
| Mabroom | 4.65 ± 0.04 c | 3.50 ± 0.04 b |
Values are the mean ± standard error of three samples. Means ± SD followed by the same letter, within a column, are not significantly different (p > 0.05). GAE, gallic acid equivalents. CEQ, catechin equivalents.
Activity of un-treated date palm pit extracts against different microbial strains (bacteria and fungi).
| # | Extract | Inhibition Zone Diameter (mm) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Khalas (Ethyl acetate) | 20 ± 1.2 a | 15 ± 1.1 | 0 |
| 2 | Khalas (Hexane) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 | Khalas (H2O: EtOH (1:1) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 | Khodari (Ethyl acetate) | 20 ± 1.3 a | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | Khodari (Hexane) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | Khodari (H2O: EtOH (1:1) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Values are the mean ± standard error of three samples. The mean with different letters in a column differed significantly at p < 0.05. For standard amikacin (30 μg) was used for S. aureus and E. coli and inhibition zone size (22 mm and 25 mm respectively); fluconazole (25 μg) used for C. albicans (29 mm).
Activity of UV-treated date palm pit extracts against different microbial strains (bacteria and fungi).
| # | Extract | Inhibition Zone Diameter (mm) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Khalas (ethyl acetate) | 20 ± 1.0 b | 0 | 0 |
| 2 | Khalas (hexane) | 0 | 7 ± 0.45 b | 0 |
| 3 | Khalas (H2O: EtOH (1:1) | 12 ± 1.0 d | 7 ± 0.6 b | 0 |
| 4 | Khodari (ethyl acetate) | 22 ± 1.5 a | 11 ± 0.9 a | 0 |
| 5 | Khodari (hexane) | 17 ± 1.2 c | 12 ± 1.0 a | 0 |
| 6 | Khodari (H2O: EtOH (1:1) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 7 | Amikacin (30 μg) | 22 | 25 | - |
| 8 | Fluconazole (25 μg) | - | - | 29 |
Values are the mean ± standard error of three samples. The mean with different letters in a column differed significantly at p < 0.05. For standard amikacin (30 μg) was used for S. aureus and E. coli and inhibition zone size (22 mm and 25 mm respectively); fluconazole (25 μg) used for C. albicans (29 mm).
Activity of date palm pit extracts against different microbial strains (bacteria and fungi).
| Bacteria | Treatment | Diameter of Inhibition Zone (mm) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Khalas | Abu Maan | Ajwa | Fard | Lulu | Mabroom | |||
| Gram-positive | Acet + H2O | 13 ± 0.3 a | 15 ± 0.3 a | 13 ± 0.2 a | 6 ± 0.1 b | 10 ± 0.2 a | 6 ± 0.1 b | |
|
| ETAC | 8 ± 0.2 c | 8 ± 0.19 b | 11 ± 0.19 b | 6 ± 0.1 b | 6 ± 0.1 b | 6 ± 0.1 b | |
| (ATCC29213) | MeOH + CFM | 9 ± 0.2 b | 15 ± 0.4 a | 10 ± 0.2 c | 10 ± 0.2 a | 6 ± 0.1 b | 13 ± 0.3 a | |
| Gram-negative | Acet + H2O | 13 ± 0.3 a | 12 ± 0.3 b | 15 ± 0.4 c | 6 ± 0.19 a | 12 ± 0.3 a | 6 ± 0.1 a | |
|
| ETAC | 12 ± 0.3 b | 12 ± 0.19 b | 16 ± 0.38 b | 6 ± 0.18 a | 10 ± 0.19 b | 6 ± 0.14 a | |
| (ATCC 25922) | MeOH + CFM | 10 ± 0.2 c | 15 ± 0.34 a | 18 ± 0.5 a | 6 ± 0.2 a | 6 ± 0.17 c | 6 ± 0.12 a | |
| Fungi | Acet + H2O | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
|
| ETAC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| (ATCC 66027) | MeOH + CFM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
Acet + H2O: Acetone + water (1:1); ETAC: Ethyl acetate; MeOH + CFM: MeOH + chloroform (1:1); Treatment: Date palm pit extracts: 10 mg/mL. Values are the mean ± standard error of three samples. The mean with different letters in a column differed significantly at p < 0.05. For standard amikacin (30 μg) was used for S. aureus and E. coli and inhibition zone size (22 mm and 25 mm respectively); fluconazole (25 μg) used for C. albicans (29 mm).
Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of date palm pit extracts against American Type Culture bacterial strains, Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli.
| Code | Date Palm Variety | Organic Solvents | Date Pit Extract (mg/mL) |
|---|---|---|---|
| (MIC) | |||
| A1 | Khalas | Acetone + water (1:1) | 10 ± 0.3 |
| B1 | Abu Maan | Acetone + water (1:1) | 10 ± 0.3 |
| B3 | Abu Maan | MeOH + chloroform (1:1) | 2.5 ± 0.3 |
| C1 | Ajwa | Acetone + water (1:1) | 7.5 ± 0.5 |
| C3 | Ajwa | MeOH + chloroform (1:1) | 5 ± 0.3 |
| D3 | Fard | MeOH + chloroform (1:1) | 7.5 ± 0.3 |
| E1 | Lulu | Acetone + water (1:1) | 5 ± 0.5 |
| E2 | Lulu | Ethyl acetate | 7.5 ± 0.3 |
| F1 | Mabroom | Acetone + water (1:1) | 2.5 ± 0.5 |
| F3 | Mabroom | MeOH + chloroform (1:1) | 5 ± 0.3 |
| Positive Control (Vancomycin) | 10 µg/mL |
Values are mean (n = 3) ± S.D. of three independent experiments.