Literature DB >> 27022890

Renal dysfunction and chronic mechanical circulatory support: from patient selection to long-term management and prognosis.

Meredith A Brisco1, Jeffrey M Testani, Jennifer L Cook.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review is to describe the effects of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) on changes in kidney function and their relationship with mortality, with an additional focus on the evaluation and management of both preimplant and post-MCS renal dysfunction. RECENT
FINDINGS: Renal dysfunction is highly prevalent in patients referred for MCS and is associated with significantly increased mortality and postoperative acute kidney injury. Most patients, including those with renal dysfunction, experience marked early improvement in renal function with MCS, likely secondary to correction of the cardiogenic shock, volume overload, and neurohormonal activation characteristic of advanced heart failure. Currently, there are no diagnostic tests to definitively distinguish reversible forms of renal dysfunction likely to improve with MCS from irreversible renal dysfunction. Furthermore, the characteristic improvements in renal function observed in the early months of MCS are often transient, with subsequent recurrence of renal dysfunction with longer durations of support. Venous congestion, right ventricular dysfunction, and reduced pulsatility are potential mechanisms involved in resurgence of renal dysfunction following MCS.
SUMMARY: With the exponential growth of MCS, research endeavors to both improve understanding of the mechanisms behind observed changes in renal function and elucidate the device-related effects on the kidney are imperative.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27022890      PMCID: PMC6176489          DOI: 10.1097/HCO.0000000000000278

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Cardiol        ISSN: 0268-4705            Impact factor:   2.161


  68 in total

1.  Use of an intrapericardial, continuous-flow, centrifugal pump in patients awaiting heart transplantation.

Authors:  Keith D Aaronson; Mark S Slaughter; Leslie W Miller; Edwin C McGee; William G Cotts; Michael A Acker; Mariell L Jessup; Igor D Gregoric; Pranav Loyalka; O H Frazier; Valluvan Jeevanandam; Allen S Anderson; Robert L Kormos; Jeffrey J Teuteberg; Wayne C Levy; David C Naftel; Richard M Bittman; Francis D Pagani; David R Hathaway; Steven W Boyce
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Restoration of Pulsatile Flow Reduces Sympathetic Nerve Activity Among Individuals With Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices.

Authors:  William K Cornwell; Takashi Tarumi; Abigail Stickford; Justin Lawley; Monique Roberts; Rosemary Parker; Catherine Fitzsimmons; Julius Kibe; Colby Ayers; David Markham; Mark H Drazner; Qi Fu; Benjamin D Levine
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Predictors and outcomes of continuous veno-venous hemodialysis use after implantation of a left ventricular assist device.

Authors:  Veli K Topkara; Nicholas C Dang; Fabio Barili; Faisal H Cheema; Timothy P Martens; Isaac George; Hasmet Bardakci; Mehmet C Oz; Yoshifumi Naka
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 10.247

4.  Cystatin C versus creatinine in determining risk based on kidney function.

Authors:  Michael G Shlipak; Kunihiro Matsushita; Johan Ärnlöv; Lesley A Inker; Ronit Katz; Kevan R Polkinghorne; Dietrich Rothenbacher; Mark J Sarnak; Brad C Astor; Josef Coresh; Andrew S Levey; Ron T Gansevoort
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Results of the post-U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approval study with a continuous flow left ventricular assist device as a bridge to heart transplantation: a prospective study using the INTERMACS (Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support).

Authors:  Randall C Starling; Yoshifumi Naka; Andrew J Boyle; Gonzalo Gonzalez-Stawinski; Ranjit John; Ulrich Jorde; Stuart D Russell; John V Conte; Keith D Aaronson; Edwin C McGee; William G Cotts; David DeNofrio; Duc Thinh Pham; David J Farrar; Francis D Pagani
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Blood urea nitrogen/creatinine ratio identifies a high-risk but potentially reversible form of renal dysfunction in patients with decompensated heart failure.

Authors:  Meredith A Brisco; Steven G Coca; Jennifer Chen; Anjali Tiku Owens; Brian D McCauley; Stephen E Kimmel; Jeffrey M Testani
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 8.790

7.  Advanced heart failure treated with continuous-flow left ventricular assist device.

Authors:  Mark S Slaughter; Joseph G Rogers; Carmelo A Milano; Stuart D Russell; John V Conte; David Feldman; Benjamin Sun; Antone J Tatooles; Reynolds M Delgado; James W Long; Thomas C Wozniak; Waqas Ghumman; David J Farrar; O Howard Frazier
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Fifth INTERMACS annual report: risk factor analysis from more than 6,000 mechanical circulatory support patients.

Authors:  James K Kirklin; David C Naftel; Robert L Kormos; Lynne W Stevenson; Francis D Pagani; Marissa A Miller; J T Baldwin; J Timothy Baldwin; James B Young
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 10.247

9.  Validity and reliability of a novel slow cuff-deflation system for noninvasive blood pressure monitoring in patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist device.

Authors:  Gregg M Lanier; Khristine Orlanes; Yacki Hayashi; Jennifer Murphy; Margaret Flannery; Rosie Te-Frey; Nir Uriel; Melana Yuzefpolskaya; Donna M Mancini; Yoshifumi Naka; Hiroo Takayama; Ulrich P Jorde; Ryan T Demmer; Paolo C Colombo
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 8.790

10.  Peritoneal dialysis after left ventricular assist device placement.

Authors:  Anthony A Guglielmi; Kelly E Guglielmi; Geetha Bhat; Roxanne Siemeck; Antone J Tatooles
Journal:  ASAIO J       Date:  2014 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.872

View more
  3 in total

1.  The trajectory of renal function following mechanical circulatory support and subsequent heart transplantation.

Authors:  Sven-Erik Bartfay; Oscar Kolsrud; Peter Wessman; Göran Dellgren; Kristjan Karason
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2022-04-19

2.  HFA of the ESC position paper on the management of LVAD-supported patients for the non-LVAD specialist healthcare provider Part 3: at the hospital and discharge.

Authors:  Finn Gustafsson; Binyamin Ben Avraham; Ovidiu Chioncel; Tal Hasin; Avishai Grupper; Aviv Shaul; Sanemn Nalbantgil; Yoav Hammer; Wilfried Mullens; Laurens F Tops; Jeremy Elliston; Steven Tsui; Davor Milicic; Johann Altenberger; Miriam Abuhazira; Stephan Winnik; Jacob Lavee; Massimo Francesco Piepoli; Lorrena Hill; Righab Hamdan; Arjang Ruhparwar; Stefan Anker; Marisa Generosa Crespo-Leiro; Andrew J S Coats; Gerasimos Filippatos; Marco Metra; Giuseppe Rosano; Petar Seferovic; Frank Ruschitzka; Stamatis Adamopoulos; Yaron Barac; Nicolaas De Jonge; Maria Frigerio; Eva Goncalvesova; Israel Gotsman; Osnat Itzhaki Ben Zadok; Piotr Ponikowski; Luciano Potena; Arsen Ristic; Tiny Jaarsma; Tuvia Ben Gal
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2021-09-28

3.  Cardiac Outcomes in Isolated Heart and Simultaneous Kidney and Heart Transplants in the United States.

Authors:  Krishna Adit Agarwal; Het Patel; Nikhil Agrawal; Francesca Cardarelli; Nitender Goyal
Journal:  Kidney Int Rep       Date:  2021-07-14
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.