Literature DB >> 16563969

Predictors and outcomes of continuous veno-venous hemodialysis use after implantation of a left ventricular assist device.

Veli K Topkara1, Nicholas C Dang, Fabio Barili, Faisal H Cheema, Timothy P Martens, Isaac George, Hasmet Bardakci, Mehmet C Oz, Yoshifumi Naka.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Post-operative renal failure is a common complication after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. This study was designed to evaluate predictors and outcomes of acute renal failure after LVAD insertion.
METHODS: Two-hundred one patients undergoing LVAD implantation at a single institution from June 1996 through April 2004 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were categorized into 2 groups: those who required post-operative continuous veno-venous hemodialysis (CVVHD) (Group 1, n = 65, 32.3%) and those who did not (Group 2, n = 136, 67.7%). Independent predictors of post-operative renal failure requiring CVVHD were determined using multivariate logistic regression techniques.
RESULTS: Patients who had post-operative renal failure requiring CVVHD were older (53.7 +/- 12.9 vs 48.2 +/- 14.2 years, p = 0.009), had a higher incidence of intra-aortic balloon pump use (46.6% vs 26.2%, p = 0.006), and had a higher pre-operative mean LVAD score (5.8 +/- 3.5 vs 3.8 +/- 3.3, p = 0.001) than those without renal failure. LVAD score was the only independent predictor of post-operative renal failure requiring CVVHD (odds ratio = 1.226, p = 0.006). Sepsis rate was higher (33.3% vs 6.9%, p < 0.001) and bridge-to-transplantation rate was lower (52.4% vs 83.5%, p < 0.001) in Group 1 than in Group 2. Post-LVAD survival rates at 1, 3, 5 and 7 years for Group 1 and Group 2 were 43.2%, 39.1%, 34.7% and 34.7% vs 79.2%, 74.0%, 68.3% and 66.4%, respectively (log rank, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Acute renal failure necessitating CVVHD remains a serious complication after LVAD and confers significant morbidity and mortality. Pre-operative evaluation of patient risk factors and optimization of peri-operative hemodynamics are of utmost importance to prevent this major complication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16563969     DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2005.11.457

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant        ISSN: 1053-2498            Impact factor:   10.247


  12 in total

Review 1.  Renal dysfunction and chronic mechanical circulatory support: from patient selection to long-term management and prognosis.

Authors:  Meredith A Brisco; Jeffrey M Testani; Jennifer L Cook
Journal:  Curr Opin Cardiol       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 2.161

Review 2.  Kidney dysfunction and left ventricular assist device support: a comprehensive perioperative review.

Authors:  Samuel T Coffin; Dia R Waguespack; Nicholas A Haglund; Simon Maltais; Jamie P Dwyer; Mary E Keebler
Journal:  Cardiorenal Med       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 2.041

3.  Early adverse events as predictors of 1-year mortality during mechanical circulatory support.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Genovese; Mary Amanda Dew; Jeffrey J Teuteberg; Marc A Simon; Jay K Bhama; Christian A Bermudez; Kathleen L Lockard; Steve Winowich; Robert L Kormos
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 10.247

4.  Myocardial Biopsy In "Idiopathic» Atrial Fibrillation And Other Arrhythmias: Nosological Diagnosis, Clinical And Morphological Parallels, And Treatment.

Authors:  O V Blagova; A V Nedostup; E A Kogan; V A Sulimov; S A Abugov; A G Kupriyanova; V A Zaydenov; A E Donnikov; E V Zaklyazminskaya; E A Okisheva
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2016-06-30

5.  Risk score derived from pre-operative data analysis predicts the need for biventricular mechanical circulatory support.

Authors:  J Raymond Fitzpatrick; John R Frederick; Vivian M Hsu; Elliott D Kozin; Mary Lou O'Hara; Elan Howell; Deborah Dougherty; Ryan C McCormick; Carine A Laporte; Jeffrey E Cohen; Kevin W Southerland; Jessica L Howard; Mariell L Jessup; Rohinton J Morris; Michael A Acker; Y Joseph Woo
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 10.247

Review 6.  Miniaturization of mechanical circulatory support systems.

Authors:  Guruprasad A Giridharan; Thomas J Lee; Mickey Ising; Michael A Sobieski; Steven C Koenig; Laman A Gray; Mark S Slaughter
Journal:  Artif Organs       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.094

Review 7.  Long-term risk of mortality and other adverse outcomes after acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Steven G Coca; Bushra Yusuf; Michael G Shlipak; Amit X Garg; Chirag R Parikh
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2009-04-05       Impact factor: 8.860

Review 8.  Left Ventricular Assist Devices and the Kidney.

Authors:  Daniel W Ross; Gerin R Stevens; Rimda Wanchoo; David T Majure; Sandeep Jauhar; Harold A Fernandez; Massini Merzkani; Kenar D Jhaveri
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 9.  Left ventricular assist devices: a kidney's perspective.

Authors:  T R Tromp; N de Jonge; J A Joles
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 4.214

10.  Incidence and impact of acute kidney injury on patients with implantable left ventricular assist devices: a Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Charat Thongprayoon; Ploypin Lertjitbanjong; Wisit Cheungpasitporn; Panupong Hansrivijit; Tibor Fülöp; Karthik Kovvuru; Swetha R Kanduri; Paul W Davis; Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula; Tarun Bathini; Kanramon Watthanasuntorn; Narut Prasitlumkum; Ronpichai Chokesuwattanaskul; Supawat Ratanapo; Michael A Mao; Kianoush Kashani
Journal:  Ren Fail       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 2.606

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.