BACKGROUND: Adding the measurement of cystatin C to that of serum creatinine to determine the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) improves accuracy, but the effect on detection, staging, and risk classification of chronic kidney disease across diverse populations has not been determined. METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis of 11 general-population studies (with 90,750 participants) and 5 studies of cohorts with chronic kidney disease (2960 participants) for whom standardized measurements of serum creatinine and cystatin C were available. We compared the association of the eGFR, as calculated by the measurement of creatinine or cystatin C alone or in combination with creatinine, with the rates of death (13,202 deaths in 15 cohorts), death from cardiovascular causes (3471 in 12 cohorts), and end-stage renal disease (1654 cases in 7 cohorts) and assessed improvement in reclassification with the use of cystatin C. RESULTS: In the general-population cohorts, the prevalence of an eGFR of less than 60 ml per minute per 1.73 m(2) of body-surface area was higher with the cystatin C-based eGFR than with the creatinine-based eGFR (13.7% vs. 9.7%). Across all eGFR categories, the reclassification of the eGFR to a higher value with the measurement of cystatin C, as compared with creatinine, was associated with a reduced risk of all three study outcomes, and reclassification to a lower eGFR was associated with an increased risk. The net reclassification improvement with the measurement of cystatin C, as compared with creatinine, was 0.23 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.18 to 0.28) for death and 0.10 (95% CI, 0.00 to 0.21) for end-stage renal disease. Results were generally similar for the five cohorts with chronic kidney disease and when both creatinine and cystatin C were used to calculate the eGFR. CONCLUSIONS: The use of cystatin C alone or in combination with creatinine strengthens the association between the eGFR and the risks of death and end-stage renal disease across diverse populations. (Funded by the National Kidney Foundation and others.).
BACKGROUND: Adding the measurement of cystatin C to that of serum creatinine to determine the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) improves accuracy, but the effect on detection, staging, and risk classification of chronic kidney disease across diverse populations has not been determined. METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis of 11 general-population studies (with 90,750 participants) and 5 studies of cohorts with chronic kidney disease (2960 participants) for whom standardized measurements of serum creatinine and cystatin C were available. We compared the association of the eGFR, as calculated by the measurement of creatinine or cystatin C alone or in combination with creatinine, with the rates of death (13,202 deaths in 15 cohorts), death from cardiovascular causes (3471 in 12 cohorts), and end-stage renal disease (1654 cases in 7 cohorts) and assessed improvement in reclassification with the use of cystatin C. RESULTS: In the general-population cohorts, the prevalence of an eGFR of less than 60 ml per minute per 1.73 m(2) of body-surface area was higher with the cystatin C-based eGFR than with the creatinine-based eGFR (13.7% vs. 9.7%). Across all eGFR categories, the reclassification of the eGFR to a higher value with the measurement of cystatin C, as compared with creatinine, was associated with a reduced risk of all three study outcomes, and reclassification to a lower eGFR was associated with an increased risk. The net reclassification improvement with the measurement of cystatin C, as compared with creatinine, was 0.23 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.18 to 0.28) for death and 0.10 (95% CI, 0.00 to 0.21) for end-stage renal disease. Results were generally similar for the five cohorts with chronic kidney disease and when both creatinine and cystatin C were used to calculate the eGFR. CONCLUSIONS: The use of cystatin C alone or in combination with creatinine strengthens the association between the eGFR and the risks of death and end-stage renal disease across diverse populations. (Funded by the National Kidney Foundation and others.).
Authors: Hans L Hillege; Vaclav Fidler; Gilles F H Diercks; Wiek H van Gilst; Dick de Zeeuw; Dirk J van Veldhuisen; Rijk O B Gans; Wilbert M T Janssen; Diederick E Grobbee; Paul E de Jong Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-10-01 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Arjan D van Zuilen; Michiel L Bots; Arzu Dulger; Ingeborg van der Tweel; Marjolijn van Buren; Marc A G J Ten Dam; Karin A H Kaasjager; Gerry Ligtenberg; Yvo W J Sijpkens; Henk E Sluiter; Peter J G van de Ven; Gerald Vervoort; Louis-Jean Vleming; Peter J Blankestijn; Jack F M Wetzels Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2012-06-27 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: Florian Kronenberg; Erich Kuen; Eberhard Ritz; Ralf Junker; Paul König; Günter Kraatz; Karl Lhotta; Johannes F E Mann; Gerhard A Müller; Ulrich Neyer; Werner Riegel; Peter Riegler; Vedat Schwenger; Arnold VON Eckardstein Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2000-01 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Jackson T Wright; George Bakris; Tom Greene; Larry Y Agodoa; Lawrence J Appel; Jeanne Charleston; DeAnna Cheek; Janice G Douglas-Baltimore; Jennifer Gassman; Richard Glassock; Lee Hebert; Kenneth Jamerson; Julia Lewis; Robert A Phillips; Robert D Toto; John P Middleton; Stephen G Rostand Journal: JAMA Date: 2002-11-20 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: M J Landray; J Thambyrajah; F J McGlynn; H J Jones; C Baigent; M J Kendall; J N Townend; D C Wheeler Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2001-09 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Bakhtawar K Mahmoodi; Kunihiro Matsushita; Mark Woodward; Peter J Blankestijn; Massimo Cirillo; Takayoshi Ohkubo; Peter Rossing; Mark J Sarnak; Bénédicte Stengel; Kazumasa Yamagishi; Kentaro Yamashita; Luxia Zhang; Josef Coresh; Paul E de Jong; Brad C Astor Journal: Lancet Date: 2012-09-24 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Carmen A Peralta; Paul Muntner; Rebecca Scherzer; Suzanne Judd; Mary Cushman; Michael G Shlipak Journal: Am J Nephrol Date: 2015-09-19 Impact factor: 3.754
Authors: David M J Naimark; Morgan E Grams; Kunihiro Matsushita; Corri Black; Iefke Drion; Caroline S Fox; Lesley A Inker; Areef Ishani; Sun Ha Jee; Akihiko Kitamura; Janice P Lea; Joseph Nally; Carmen Alicia Peralta; Dietrich Rothenbacher; Seungho Ryu; Marcello Tonelli; Hiroshi Yatsuya; Josef Coresh; Ron T Gansevoort; David G Warnock; Mark Woodward; Paul E de Jong Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2015-12-11 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Shruti Gupta; Sharon G Curhan; Karen J Cruickshanks; Barbara E K Klein; Ronald Klein; Gary C Curhan Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2019-05-28 Impact factor: 3.325
Authors: Derek K Ng; George J Schwartz; Michael F Schneider; Susan L Furth; Bradley A Warady Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2018-05-05 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: Kunihiro Matsushita; Shoshana H Ballew; Josef Coresh; Hisatomi Arima; Johan Ärnlöv; Massimo Cirillo; Natalie Ebert; Jade S Hiramoto; Heejin Kimm; Michael G Shlipak; Frank L J Visseren; Ron T Gansevoort; Csaba P Kovesdy; Varda Shalev; Mark Woodward; Florian Kronenberg Journal: Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol Date: 2017-07-14 Impact factor: 32.069
Authors: Charles R Swanepoel; Mohamed G Atta; Vivette D D'Agati; Michelle M Estrella; Agnes B Fogo; Saraladevi Naicker; Frank A Post; Nicola Wearne; Cheryl A Winkler; Michael Cheung; David C Wheeler; Wolfgang C Winkelmayer; Christina M Wyatt Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2018-02-03 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: Sofia Perazzo; Ángel A Soler-García; Yetrib Hathout; Jharna R Das; Patricio E Ray Journal: Proteomics Clin Appl Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 3.494