Literature DB >> 28123078

Cortical Representation of Interaural Time Difference Is Impaired by Deafness in Development: Evidence from Children with Early Long-term Access to Sound through Bilateral Cochlear Implants Provided Simultaneously.

Vijayalakshmi Easwar1,2, Hiroshi Yamazaki3, Michael Deighton3, Blake Papsin4,5, Karen Gordon3,4.   

Abstract

Accurate use of interaural time differences (ITDs) for spatial hearing may require access to bilateral auditory input during sensitive periods in human development. Providing bilateral cochlear implants (CIs) simultaneously promotes symmetrical development of bilateral auditory pathways but does not support normal ITD sensitivity. Thus, although binaural interactions are established by bilateral CIs in the auditory brainstem, potential deficits in cortical processing of ITDs remain. Cortical ITD processing in children with simultaneous bilateral CIs and normal hearing with similar time-in-sound was explored in the present study. Cortical activity evoked by bilateral stimuli with varying ITDs (0, ±0.4, ±1 ms) was recorded using multichannel electroencephalography. Source analyses indicated dominant activity in the right auditory cortex in both groups but limited ITD processing in children with bilateral CIs. In normal-hearing children, adult-like processing patterns were found underlying the immature P1 (∼100 ms) response peak with reduced activity in the auditory cortex ipsilateral to the leading ITD. Further, the left cortex showed a stronger preference than the right cortex for stimuli leading from the contralateral hemifield. By contrast, children with CIs demonstrated reduced ITD-related changes in both auditory cortices. Decreased parieto-occipital activity, possibly involved in spatial processing, was also revealed in children with CIs. Thus, simultaneous bilateral implantation in young children maintains right cortical dominance during binaural processing but does not fully overcome effects of deafness using present CI devices. Protection of bilateral pathways through simultaneous implantation might be capitalized for ITD processing with signal processing advances, which more consistently represent binaural timing cues.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Multichannel electroencephalography demonstrated impairment of binaural processing in children who are deaf despite early access to bilateral auditory input by first finding that foundations for binaural hearing are normally established during early stages of cortical development. Although 4- to 7-year-old children with normal hearing had immature cortical responses, adult patterns in cortical coding of binaural timing cues were measured. Second, children receiving two cochlear implants in the same surgery maintained normal-like input from both ears, but this did not support significant effects of binaural timing cues in either auditory cortex. Deficits in parieto-occiptal areas further suggested impairment in spatial processing. Results indicate that cochlear implants working independently in each ear do not fully overcome deafness-related binaural processing deficits, even after long-term experience.
Copyright © 2017 the authors 0270-6474/17/372350-13$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  beamformer; hearing loss; right dominance; simultaneous bilateral cochlear implant; source localization; spatial processing

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28123078      PMCID: PMC6596836          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2538-16.2017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  78 in total

Review 1.  Statistical limitations in functional neuroimaging. II. Signal detection and statistical inference.

Authors:  K M Petersson; T E Nichols; J B Poline; A P Holmes
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1999-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Maturation of human central auditory system activity: evidence from multi-channel evoked potentials.

Authors:  C W Ponton; J J Eggermont; B Kwong; M Don
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  A PET study of human auditory spatial processing.

Authors:  R A Weeks; A Aziz-Sultan; K O Bushara; B Tian; C M Wessinger; N Dang; J P Rauschecker; M Hallett
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1999-03-12       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  Plasticity in the neural coding of auditory space in the mammalian brain.

Authors:  A J King; C H Parsons; D R Moore
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Experience-dependent refinement of inhibitory inputs to auditory coincidence-detector neurons.

Authors:  Christoph Kapfer; Armin H Seidl; Hermann Schweizer; Benedikt Grothe
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  Cytoarchitectural and axonal maturation in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  J K Moore; Y L Guan
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2001-12

7.  Maturation of human central auditory system activity: separating auditory evoked potentials by dipole source modeling.

Authors:  Curtis Ponton; Jos J Eggermont; Deepak Khosla; Betty Kwong; Manuel Don
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.708

8.  Sensorineural hearing loss during development: morphological and physiological response of the cochlea and auditory brainstem.

Authors:  N A Hardie; R K Shepherd
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Right parietal cortex is involved in the perception of sound movement in humans.

Authors:  T D Griffiths; G Rees; A Rees; G G Green; C Witton; D Rowe; C Büchel; R Turner; R S Frackowiak
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  Spatial localization after excision of human auditory cortex.

Authors:  R J Zatorre; V B Penhune
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-08-15       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  7 in total

1.  Cortical hemispheric asymmetries are present at young ages and further develop into adolescence.

Authors:  Hiroshi Yamazaki; Vijayalakshmi Easwar; Melissa Jane Polonenko; Salima Jiwani; Daniel D E Wong; Blake Croll Papsin; Karen Ann Gordon
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-11-13       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Chronic Bilateral Cochlear Implant Stimulation Partially Restores Neural Binaural Sensitivity in Neonatally-Deaf Rabbits.

Authors:  Woongsang Sunwoo; Bertrand Delgutte; Yoojin Chung
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Cortical organization restored by cochlear implantation in young children with single sided deafness.

Authors:  Melissa Jane Polonenko; Karen Ann Gordon; Sharon Lynn Cushing; Blake Croll Papsin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Evaluating the Impact of Age, Acoustic Exposure, and Electrical Stimulation on Binaural Sensitivity in Adult Bilateral Cochlear Implant Patients.

Authors:  Tanvi Thakkar; Sean R Anderson; Alan Kan; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2020-06-26

5.  Bimodal Benefits for Lexical Tone Recognition: An Investigation on Mandarin-speaking Preschoolers with a Cochlear Implant and a Contralateral Hearing Aid.

Authors:  Hao Zhang; Jing Zhang; Hongwei Ding; Yang Zhang
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2020-04-17

6.  Delayed access to bilateral input alters cortical organization in children with asymmetric hearing.

Authors:  Melissa Jane Polonenko; Blake Croll Papsin; Karen Ann Gordon
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 4.881

7.  Limiting asymmetric hearing improves benefits of bilateral hearing in children using cochlear implants.

Authors:  Melissa Jane Polonenko; Blake Croll Papsin; Karen Ann Gordon
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.