Literature DB >> 27021278

From statistical significance to clinical relevance: A simple algorithm to integrate brain natriuretic peptide and the Seattle Heart Failure Model for risk stratification in heart failure.

Omar F AbouEzzeddine1, Benjamin French2, Sultan A Mirzoyev3, Allan S Jaffe4, Wayne C Levy5, James C Fang6, Nancy K Sweitzer7, Thomas P Cappola8, Margaret M Redfield9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) guidelines recommend brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and multivariable risk scores, such as the Seattle Heart Failure Model (SHFM), to predict risk in HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). A practical way to integrate information from these 2 prognostic tools is lacking. We sought to establish a SHFM+BNP risk-stratification algorithm.
METHODS: The retrospective derivation cohort included consecutive patients with HFrEF at the Mayo Clinic. One-year outcome (death, transplantation or ventricular assist device) was assessed. The SHFM+BNP algorithm was derived by stratifying patients within SHFM-predicted risk categories (≤2.5%, 2.6% to ≤10%, >10%) according to BNP above or below 700 pg/ml and comparing SHFM-predicted and observed event rates within each SHFM+BNP category. The algorithm was validated in a prospective, multicenter HFrEF registry (Penn HF Study).
RESULTS: Derivation (n = 441; 1-year event rate 17%) and validation (n = 1,513; 1-year event rate 12%) cohorts differed with the former being older and more likely ischemic with worse symptoms, lower EF, worse renal function and higher BNP and SHFM scores. In both cohorts, across the 3 SHFM-predicted risk strata, a BNP >700 pg/ml consistently identified patients with approximately 3-fold the risk that the SHFM would have otherwise estimated, regardless of stage of HF, intensity and duration of HF therapy and comorbidities. Conversely, the SHFM was appropriately calibrated in patients with a BNP <700 pg/ml.
CONCLUSION: The simple SHFM+BNP algorithm displays stable performance across diverse HFrEF cohorts and may enhance risk stratification to enable appropriate decision-making regarding HF therapeutic or palliative strategies.
Copyright © 2016 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Seattle Heart Failure Model; biomarkers; heart failure; natriuretic peptides; prognosis; risk stratification

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27021278      PMCID: PMC4917454          DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2016.01.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant        ISSN: 1053-2498            Impact factor:   10.247


  32 in total

1.  Evaluating the added predictive ability of a new marker: from area under the ROC curve to reclassification and beyond.

Authors:  Michael J Pencina; Ralph B D'Agostino; Ralph B D'Agostino; Ramachandran S Vasan
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Multiple biomarkers for risk prediction in chronic heart failure.

Authors:  Bonnie Ky; Benjamin French; Wayne C Levy; Nancy K Sweitzer; James C Fang; Alan H B Wu; Lee R Goldberg; Mariell Jessup; Thomas P Cappola
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 8.790

3.  Extensions of net reclassification improvement calculations to measure usefulness of new biomarkers.

Authors:  Michael J Pencina; Ralph B D'Agostino; Ewout W Steyerberg
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-11-05       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Predictive value of the Seattle Heart Failure Model in patients undergoing left ventricular assist device placement.

Authors:  Eric S Ketchum; Alec J Moorman; Daniel P Fishbein; Nahush A Mokadam; Edward D Verrier; Gabriel S Aldea; Shauna Andrus; Kenneth W Kenyon; Wayne C Levy
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 10.247

6.  Plasma brain natriuretic peptide concentration: impact of age and gender.

Authors:  Margaret M Redfield; Richard J Rodeheffer; Steven J Jacobsen; Douglas W Mahoney; Kent R Bailey; John C Burnett
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2002-09-04       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Incremental value of renal function in risk prediction with the Seattle Heart Failure Model.

Authors:  Grigorios Giamouzis; Andreas P Kalogeropoulos; Vasiliki V Georgiopoulou; Syed A Agha; Mohammad A Rashad; Sonjoy R Laskar; Andrew L Smith; Javed Butler
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 4.749

8.  The Seattle Heart Failure Model: prediction of survival in heart failure.

Authors:  Wayne C Levy; Dariush Mozaffarian; David T Linker; Santosh C Sutradhar; Stefan D Anker; Anne B Cropp; Inder Anand; Aldo Maggioni; Paul Burton; Mark D Sullivan; Bertram Pitt; Philip A Poole-Wilson; Douglas L Mann; Milton Packer
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-03-13       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  B-type natriuretic peptide strongly reflects diastolic wall stress in patients with chronic heart failure: comparison between systolic and diastolic heart failure.

Authors:  Yoshitaka Iwanaga; Isao Nishi; Shinichi Furuichi; Teruo Noguchi; Kazuhiro Sase; Yasuki Kihara; Yoichi Goto; Hiroshi Nonogi
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2006-01-26       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Targeted anticytokine therapy in patients with chronic heart failure: results of the Randomized Etanercept Worldwide Evaluation (RENEWAL).

Authors:  Douglas L Mann; John J V McMurray; Milton Packer; Karl Swedberg; Jeffrey S Borer; Wilson S Colucci; Jacques Djian; Helmut Drexler; Arthur Feldman; Lars Kober; Henry Krum; Peter Liu; Markku Nieminen; Luigi Tavazzi; Dirk Jan van Veldhuisen; Anders Waldenstrom; Marshelle Warren; Arne Westheim; Faiez Zannad; Thomas Fleming
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-03-15       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  6 in total

1.  Referral Criteria to Palliative Care for Patients With Heart Failure: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Yuchieh Kathryn Chang; Holland Kaplan; Yimin Geng; Li Mo; Jennifer Philip; Anna Collins; Larry A Allen; John A McClung; Martin A Denvir; David Hui
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 8.790

Review 2.  Use of speckle tracking to assess heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.

Authors:  John B Hiebert; James Vacek; Zubair Shah; Faith Rahman; Janet D Pierce
Journal:  J Cardiol       Date:  2019-07-12       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  The Utility of Pentraxin and Modified Prognostic Scales in Predicting Outcomes of Patients with End-Stage Heart Failure.

Authors:  Wioletta Szczurek-Wasilewicz; Michał Skrzypek; Ewa Romuk; Mariusz Gąsior; Bożena Szyguła-Jurkiewicz
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 4.  Cardiac Biomarkers in Advanced Heart Failure: How Can They Impact Our Pre-transplant or Pre-LVAD Decision-making.

Authors:  Imo Ebong; Sula Mazimba; Khadijah Breathett
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2019-12

5.  Effects of serum N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide and D-dimer levels on patients with acute ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Jia Li; Chengzhi Gu; Dan Li; Lan Chen; Zhenhui Lu; Lianhai Zhu; Huaiyu Huang
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2018 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.088

6.  Prognostic value of natriuretic peptides in heart failure: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tayler A Buchan; Crizza Ching; Farid Foroutan; Abdullah Malik; Julian F Daza; Nicholas Ng Fat Hing; Reed Siemieniuk; Nathan Evaniew; Ani Orchanian-Cheff; Heather J Ross; Gordon Guyatt; Ana C Alba
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 4.214

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.