Literature DB >> 20558086

Predictive value of the Seattle Heart Failure Model in patients undergoing left ventricular assist device placement.

Eric S Ketchum1, Alec J Moorman, Daniel P Fishbein, Nahush A Mokadam, Edward D Verrier, Gabriel S Aldea, Shauna Andrus, Kenneth W Kenyon, Wayne C Levy.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are increasingly used in advanced heart failure patients. Despite proven efficacy, optimal timing of LVAD implantation is not well defined.
METHODS: Patients receiving an LVAD were prospectively recorded. Laboratory and clinical data were extracted and used to calculate the predicted survival with medical therapy using the Seattle Heart Failure Model (SHFM). This was compared with observed survival, hospital length of stay and timeliness of discharge.
RESULTS: We identified 104 patients. Survival with an LVAD vs SHFM predicted survival was 69% vs 11% at 1 year, corresponding to a hazard ratio of 0.17 (p < 0.0001). SHFM-estimated 1-year survival with medical therapy increased from 4% in 1997 to 2004 to 25% in 2007-2008 (p < 0.0001). Subgroup analysis of higher vs lower risk LVAD patients showed observed 1-year survival of 83% vs 57% (p = 0.04). The lower risk group had a shorter length of stay (46 vs 75 days, p = 0.03), along with higher rates of discharge prior to transplant (88% vs 61%, p = 0.01) and discharge within 60 days of LVAD placement (77% vs 52%, p = 0.03).
CONCLUSIONS: The SHFM allows prediction of important features of a patient's hospital course post-operatively, including length of stay and 1-year survival. Given evidence of improved survival and shorter hospital stay in lower risk patients, earlier LVAD placement based on a prediction model like the SHFM should be considered in advanced heart failure patients. The SHFM may have utility as a virtual control arm for single-arm LVAD trials. Copyright 2010 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20558086     DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2010.05.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant        ISSN: 1053-2498            Impact factor:   10.247


  20 in total

1.  A key role for nuclear cardiac imaging in evaluating and managing patients with heart failure.

Authors:  Mark I Travin; Gayathri Kamalakkannan
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Physical and psychological symptom profiling and event-free survival in adults with moderate to advanced heart failure.

Authors:  Christopher S Lee; Jill M Gelow; Quin E Denfeld; James O Mudd; Donna Burgess; Jennifer K Green; Shirin O Hiatt; Corrine Y Jurgens
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Nurs       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.083

Review 3.  Frailty and the selection of patients for destination therapy left ventricular assist device.

Authors:  Kelsey M Flint; Daniel D Matlock; Joann Lindenfeld; Larry A Allen
Journal:  Circ Heart Fail       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 8.790

Review 4.  Current indications for transplantation: stratification of severe heart failure and shared decision-making.

Authors:  Darko Vucicevic; Lily Honoris; Federica Raia; Mario Deng
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2018-01

5.  Assessing the impact of heart failure therapeutics on quality of life and functional capacity.

Authors:  Eldrin F Lewis
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2013-08

6.  Strategies of Wait-listing for Heart Transplant vs Durable Mechanical Circulatory Support Alone for Patients With Advanced Heart Failure.

Authors:  Anuradha Lala; John C Rowland; Bart S Ferket; Annetine C Gelijns; Emilia Bagiella; Sean P Pinney; Alan J Moskowitz; Marissa A Miller; Francis D Pagani; Donna M Mancini
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 14.676

7.  Predictors of hospital length of stay after implantation of a left ventricular assist device: an analysis of the INTERMACS registry.

Authors:  William G Cotts; Edwin C McGee; Susan L Myers; David C Naftel; James B Young; James K Kirklin; Kathleen L Grady
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2014-03-01       Impact factor: 10.247

8.  Is cardiopulmonary exercise testing essential to indicate ventricular assist device implantation in patients with INTERMACS profile 4-7?

Authors:  Teruhiko Imamura; Koichiro Kinugawa; Daisuke Nitta; Osamu Kinoshita; Kan Nawata; Minoru Ono
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 1.731

Review 9.  Left ventricular assist device patient selection: do risk scores help?

Authors:  Ashwin K Ravichandran; Jennifer Cowger
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.895

10.  From statistical significance to clinical relevance: A simple algorithm to integrate brain natriuretic peptide and the Seattle Heart Failure Model for risk stratification in heart failure.

Authors:  Omar F AbouEzzeddine; Benjamin French; Sultan A Mirzoyev; Allan S Jaffe; Wayne C Levy; James C Fang; Nancy K Sweitzer; Thomas P Cappola; Margaret M Redfield
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 10.247

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.