Literature DB >> 27017060

How do thoughts, emotions, and decisions align? A new way to examine theory of mind during middle childhood and beyond.

Noel M Elrod1, Hannah J Kramer1, Kristin Hansen Lagattuta1.   

Abstract

The current study examined 4- to 10-year-olds' and adults' (N=280) tendency to connect people's thoughts, emotions, and decisions into valence-matched mental state triads (thought valence=emotion valence=decision valence; e.g., anticipate something bad+feel worried+avoid) and valence-matched mental state dyads (thought-emotion, thought-decision, and emotion-decision). Participants heard vignettes about focal characters who re-encountered individuals who had previously harmed them twice, helped them twice, or both harmed and helped them. Baseline trials involved no past experience. Children and adults predicted the focal characters' thoughts (anticipate something good or bad), emotions (feel happy or worried), and decisions (go near or stay away). Results showed significant increases between 4 and 10years of age in the formation of valence-matched mental state triads and dyads, with thoughts and emotions most often aligned by valence. We also documented age-related improvement in awareness that uncertain situations elicit less valence-consistent mental states than more certain situations, with females expecting weaker coherence among characters' thoughts, emotions, and decisions than males. Controlling for age and sex, individuals with stronger executive function (working memory and inhibitory control) predicted more valence-aligned mental states. These findings add to the emerging literature on development and individual differences in children's reasoning about mental states and emotions during middle childhood and beyond.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Emotion understanding; Executive function; Individual differences; Middle childhood; Sex differences; Theory of mind

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27017060      PMCID: PMC4907807          DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2016.01.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol        ISSN: 0022-0965


  68 in total

1.  The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex "Frontal Lobe" tasks: a latent variable analysis.

Authors:  A Miyake; N P Friedman; M J Emerson; A H Witzki; A Howerter; T D Wager
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 2.  Biobehavioral responses to stress in females: tend-and-befriend, not fight-or-flight.

Authors:  S E Taylor; L C Klein; B P Lewis; T L Gruenewald; R A Gurung; J A Updegraff
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Meta-analysis of theory-of-mind development: the truth about false belief.

Authors:  H M Wellman; D Cross; J Watson
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2001 May-Jun

4.  Valence Effects in Reasoning About Evaluative Traits.

Authors:  Gail D Heyman; Jessica W Giles
Journal:  Merrill Palmer Q (Wayne State Univ Press)       Date:  2004-01-01

Review 5.  A developmental perspective on executive function.

Authors:  John R Best; Patricia H Miller
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec

6.  Sibling composition, executive function, and children's thinking about mental diversity.

Authors:  Katie Kennedy; Kristin Hansen Lagattuta; Liat Sayfan
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2015-02-14

7.  Emotion understanding and theory of mind among maltreated children in foster care: evidence of deficits.

Authors:  Katherine C Pears; Philip A Fisher
Journal:  Dev Psychopathol       Date:  2005

8.  Children's sensitivity to their own relative ignorance: handling of possibilities under epistemic and physical uncertainty.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Robinson; Martin G Rowley; Sarah R Beck; Dan J Carroll; Ian A Apperly
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec

9.  Developing appreciation for ambivalence: the understanding of concurrent conflicting desires in 4- to 7-year-old children.

Authors:  Kristin Rostad; Penny M Pexman
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  2014-04-07

10.  The reciprocal relationship between executive function and theory of mind in middle childhood: a 1-year longitudinal perspective.

Authors:  Gina Austin; Karoline Groppe; Birgit Elsner
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-06-24
View more
  8 in total

1.  Neural correlates of "Theory of Mind" in very preterm born children.

Authors:  Sarah I Mossad; Mary Lou Smith; Elizabeth W Pang; Margot J Taylor
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Is There a Downside to Anticipating the Upside? Children's and Adults' Reasoning About How Prior Expectations Shape Future Emotions.

Authors:  Karen Hjortsvang Lara; Kristin Hansen Lagattuta; Hannah J Kramer
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2017-11-24

3.  Try to look on the bright side: Children and adults can (sometimes) override their tendency to prioritize negative faces.

Authors:  Kristin Hansen Lagattuta; Hannah J Kramer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2017-01

4.  Children's and Adults' Beliefs about the Stability of Traits from Infancy to Adulthood: Contributions of Age and Executive Function.

Authors:  Hannah J Kramer; Taylor D Wood; Karen Hjortsvang Lara; Kristin Hansen Lagattuta
Journal:  Cogn Dev       Date:  2020-12-03

5.  Executive Function, Theory of Mind, and Conduct-Problem Symptoms in Middle Childhood.

Authors:  Gina Austin; Rebecca Bondü; Birgit Elsner
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2020-04-02

6.  Theory of Mind in ADHD. A Proposal to Improve Working Memory through the Stimulation of the Theory of Mind.

Authors:  Rocío Lavigne; Antonia González-Cuenca; Marta Romero-González; Marta Sánchez
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  This is not what I expected: The impact of prior expectations on children's and adults' preferences and emotions.

Authors:  Karen Hjortsvang Lara; Hannah J Kramer; Kristin Hansen Lagattuta
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2021-05

8.  Same or different? Theory of mind among children with and without disabilities.

Authors:  Joanna Smogorzewska; Grzegorz Szumski; Paweł Grygiel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.