| Literature DB >> 33642677 |
Hannah J Kramer1,2, Taylor D Wood1,2, Karen Hjortsvang Lara1,2, Kristin Hansen Lagattuta1,2.
Abstract
We examined developmental differences and sources of variability in trait reasoning. Four- to 10-year-olds and adults (N=198) rated how mean or nice "medium-mean" and "medium-nice" babies, kids, and teenagers were earlier in their lifetime and would be at older ages. Participants expected nice-labeled characters to be nice throughout their lives (participant age effects were null). In contrast, we documented age-related differences in judgments about meanness. With increasing participant age, individuals expected that meanness present in infancy, childhood, and adolescence would persist into adulthood. We discovered a curvilinear pattern in assessments of whether meanness originates during infancy: Four- to 5-year-olds and adults expected mean-labeled kids and teenagers to have been nicer as babies than did 6- to 10-year-olds. Controlling for age and working memory, participants with better inhibitory control more frequently expected mean-labeled individuals to remain mean across the lifespan, but inhibitory control was unrelated to judgments about nice-labeled individuals.Entities:
Keywords: development; executive function; individual differences; positivity bias; trait reasoning
Year: 2020 PMID: 33642677 PMCID: PMC7904106 DOI: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2020.100975
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cogn Dev ISSN: 0885-2014