Literature DB >> 27016903

Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery: Review of Indications and Outcomes from 75 Consecutive Patients.

Deborah S Keller1, Reena N Tahilramani2, Juan R Flores-Gonzalez3, Ali Mahmood4, Eric M Haas5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) is an advanced local excision platform that helps overcome technical limitations and morbidity associated with other resection methods. Our goal was to review the indications and outcomes of TAMIS in a large series. STUDY
DESIGN: A review of a prospective database identified patients who underwent TAMIS from 2010 to 2014. Demographic, perioperative, short-term outcomes, and recurrence data were analyzed.
RESULTS: There were 75 patients with 76 lesions analyzed. Mean age was 64.0 years (SD 11.6 years) and mean BMI was 27.4 kg/m(2) (SD 4.7 kg/m(2)). Median American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score was 2 (range 1 to 4). There were 59 benign (77.3%) and 17 malignant (22.7%) lesions: 6 pT0, 6 pT1, 4 pT2, and 1 pT3. Median lesion distance from the anal verge was 10 cm (range 6 to 16 cm). Mean operative time was 76.0 minutes (SD 36.1 minutes). Three patients had intraperitoneal entry; all were closed transanally, but 2 had temporary diverting ileostomies fashioned to ensure healing. Median length of stay was 1 day (range 0 to 6). One patient had a fragmented lesion (1.3%). Five patients had positive margins: 2 in palliative pT2 resections, and 3 in pT1, pT2, and gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) patients. They were managed with radical resection (pT1 and pT2 lesions) and surveillance/medical oncology (GIST). Postoperatively, 3 patients had complications (bleeding, rectal stricture, and recto-vaginal fistula), and all were managed nonoperatively. After median follow-up of 39.5 months (range 10.5 to 65.3 months), 1 pT1 patient with negative margins developed a local recurrence and underwent salvage APR.
CONCLUSIONS: Transanal minimally invasive surgery is a viable option for excision of benign or early stage rectal masses, with mid-term oncologic outcomes comparable to those of radical resection. Further, TAMIS minimizes the morbidity and can allow more patients to benefit from the minimally invasive approach.
Copyright © 2016 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27016903     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.02.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  14 in total

1.  Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery (TAMIS): a clinical spotlight review.

Authors:  Teresa deBeche-Adams; Imran Hassan; Stephen Haggerty; Dimitrios Stefanidis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Establishing the learning curve of transanal minimally invasive surgery for local excision of rectal neoplasms.

Authors:  Lawrence Lee; Justin Kelly; George J Nassif; Deborah Keller; Teresa C Debeche-Adams; Paul A Mancuso; John R Monson; Matthew R Albert; Sam B Atallah
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Risk of recurrence after local resection of T1 rectal cancer: a meta-analysis with meta-regression.

Authors:  Nik Dekkers; Hao Dang; Jolein van der Kraan; Saskia le Cessie; Philip P Oldenburg; Jan W Schoones; Alexandra M J Langers; Monique E van Leerdam; Jeanin E van Hooft; Yara Backes; Katarina Levic; Alexander Meining; Giorgio M Saracco; Fabian A Holman; Koen C M J Peeters; Leon M G Moons; Pascal G Doornebosch; James C H Hardwick; Jurjen J Boonstra
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Transanal minimal invasive surgery (TAMIS): safety and feasibility for the resection of benign and malignant lesions of the rectum.

Authors:  Asif Mehraj; Najmus Saqib; Rauf Wani; Nisar Chowdri; Fazl Parray; Mudassir Khan
Journal:  Turk J Surg       Date:  2021-03-22

5.  A combination of transanal minimally invasive surgery and transanal technique to facilitate suturing during transanal minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  Robert Christie; Jeremy Sugrue; Saleh Eftaiha; Jan Kaminski; Tareq Kamal; John Park; Leela Prasad; Slawomir Marecik
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2016-07-15

Review 6.  Rectal Trauma: Evidence-Based Practices.

Authors:  Michael S Clemens; Kaitlin M Peace; Fia Yi
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2017-12-19

7.  Transanal minimally invasive surgery for benign large rectal polyps and early malignant rectal cancers: experience and outcomes from the first Canadian centre to adopt the technique.

Authors:  Antonio Caycedo-Marulanda; Henry Y Jiang; Erica L Kohtakangas
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.089

8.  Clinical efficacy and quality of life after transrectal natural orifice specimen extraction for the treatment of middle and upper rectal cancer.

Authors:  Zhe Zhu; Kai-Jing Wang; Guy R Orangio; Jun-Yi Han; Bing Lu; Zhu-Qing Zhou; Wei Gao; Chuan-Gang Fu
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2020-04

Review 9.  Education and Training in Transanal Endoscopic Surgery and Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision.

Authors:  Deborah S Keller; F Borja de Lacy; Roel Hompes
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2021-03-31

Review 10.  Recent advances in the management of rectal cancer: No surgery, minimal surgery or minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  Joseph M Plummer; Pierre-Anthony Leake; Matthew R Albert
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-06-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.