Literature DB >> 27014504

Micro-particle manipulation by single beam acoustic tweezers based on hydrothermal PZT thick film.

Benpeng Zhu, Jiong Xu1, Ying Li2, Tian Wang3, Ke Xiong3, Changyang Lee2, Xiaofei Yang1, Michihisa Shiiba4, Shinichi Takeuchi4, Qifa Zhou2, K Kirk Shung2.   

Abstract

Single-beam acoustic tweezers (SBAT), used in laboratory-on-a-chip (LOC) device has promising implications for an individual micro-particle contactless manipulation. In this study, a freestanding hydrothermal PZT thick film with excellent piezoelectric property (d33 = 270pC/N and kt = 0.51) was employed for SBAT applications and a press-focusing technology was introduced. The obtained SBAT, acting at an operational frequency of 50MHz, a low f-number (∼0.9), demonstrated the capability to trap and manipulate a micro-particle sized 10μm in the distilled water. These results suggest that such a device has great potential as a manipulator for a wide range of biomedical and chemical science applications.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 27014504      PMCID: PMC4788601          DOI: 10.1063/1.4943492

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AIP Adv            Impact factor:   1.548


The contact-free manipulation of micro-particle is of great use for the biological and medical fields. Hence, research on precise micro-particle positioning has attracted much attention recently. Dielectrophorestic and magnetic forces have been traditionally used to remotely manipulate micro-particles. Nevertheless, these two technologies are limited to polarizable particle and magnetic particle, respectively. To realize electrically neutral and nonmagnetic micro-particle contactless manipulation, optical tweezers has been developed. Unfortunately, the high energy of the focused laser often causes photo-damage in the targeted sample. In addition, the optical radiation force (at pico-newton level) is too small to manipulate larger particles. To address these issues, acoustic tweezers utilizing single beam, standing wave and surface acoustic wave have been proposed. As a promising single-particle manipulator, single beam acoustic tweezers (SBAT) is attractive. Its narrow acoustic beam, which has a steep intensity gradient that is produced using high-frequency ultrasound and a tight focus, can trap and manipulate micro-particle in a contact-free fashion, producing almost no damage. To form a highly focused acoustic beam, SBATs require a high-frequency ultrasound transducer with a low f-number (f#= focal length / aperture size); leading to that, the fabrication of SBAT remains challenging. Piezoelectric thick films are regarded as a good candidate for high-frequency (≥50MHz) transducer applications; however, lapping down a piezoelectric single crystal or ceramic to a thickness of several tens of micrometers is both difficult and time-consuming. Almost all of the high frequency transducers based on piezoelectric thick films have been aimed at ultrasound imaging; in these cases, the transducer does not need to be tightly focused (f-number close to 1). To date, only ZnO films have been reported for SBAT applications. The main reason for this is that, when compared with other piezoelectric films, ZnO films are much easier to grow with a preferential orientation on different substrates; this property of ZnO films makes them suitable for the implementation of lens and self-focusing technologies to form steep acoustic beams. However, the weak piezoelectric response of ZnO (d33 ≈ 10–26 pm/V, kt ≈ 0.28) presents a major obstacle, limiting the trapping force. Besides, this film sputtering technology is just right for ultra-high frequency (>100MHz) SBAT, and it doesn’t work for the SBAT with a relatively lower operational frequency, for example 50MHz∼100MHz. In our previous work, hydrothermal PZT thick films have been successfully used to fabricated 50MHz∼100MHz ultrasound transducer and array. It is worth mentioning that this kind of film exhibited a superior electromechanical coupling coefficient kt = 0.52. The kt value of a film represents its conversion efficiency between electrical and acoustic energy; generally, the higher the kt value, the greater the trapping force will be. Hence, SBAT based on such hydrothermal PZT thick film is worthy to be expected. This study focused on the feasibility of applying hydrothermal PZT thick films to produce SBAT. Because lens and self-focusing technologies are not suitable for hydrothermal PZT thick films, we investigated a press-focusing method. The manipulation of micro-particle was realized; the trapping force was discussed, and the trapping experiments were performed. Using a novel rapid heating and cooling technology, a 35-μm hydrothermal PZT thick film was self-separated intactly from Ti substrate due to the different thermal expansion coefficients. As shown in Fig. 1(A), the obtained freestanding film was translucent, and had an area of 2 cm × 1.5 cm. After poling, the film’s d33 was measured to be 270pC/N, which is comparable to that of piezoelectric bulk material. The process of fabricating a tightly focused, high-frequency ultrasound transducer is illustrated schematically in Fig. 1(B)–1(E). First, E-Solder 3022 (Von Roll Isola Inc., New Haven, CT) was selected as the backing layer, and was then cast (using centrifugation) on an Au-coated hydrothermal PZT thick film. After the acoustic stack was diced into a 1.5 mm × 1.5 mm grid, it was tuned to a 1-mm diameter, and connected via a wire on the backing layer; it was then placed concentrically in a brass housing, using Epoxy 301 (Epoxy Technologies, Billerica, MA) as an insulator to fill the gap between the stack and the housing, as shown in Fig. 1(B). To obtain a highly focused acoustic beam, a special fixture, displayed in Fig. 1(C), was designed. Using this fixture, the transducer could be held with a stainless steel ball in its center during the press-focusing process; this process is depicted in Fig. 1(D) and 1(E). Afterward, an Au layer and a parylene layer were deposited on the front of the transducer (which had an f-number of 0.9) as the upper electrode and matching layer, respectively. Finally, the transducer was assembled with a SMA connector, which is shown in Fig. 1(F).
FIG. 1.

(A) Photograph of freestanding hydrothermal PZT thick film; (B)–(E) process used to fabricate a tightly focused high-frequency ultrasound transducer; (F) photograph of the transducer obtained for SBAT applications.

As illustrated in Fig. 2(A), it can be seen that resonant and anti-resonant peaks are located at 46.8MHz and 53.2 MHz, respectively. According to the IEEE standard, electromechanical coupling coefficient in thickness mode (kt) can be given by Substituting the appropriate values into Eq. (1), kt is calculated to be 0.51, which is similar to our previous result. It is worthy to be noticed that no piezoelectric thick film has been reported to possess such high kt value after being tightly press-focused. This may be attributed to the unique columnar microstructure of hydrothermal PZT thick film. Additionally, a peak in the phase curve is observed at 50.4MHz, indicating that the central frequency of the tightly focused thick film transducer is nearby. A pulse-echo test was conducted in a deionized water bath at room temperature, and an X-cut quartz plate was selected as the target. The measured pulse echo waveform and normalized frequency spectrum are shown in Fig. 2(B). The central frequency of the hydrothermal PZT thick film transducer is 50 MHz, in good agreement with the electrical impedance result. The bandwidth at −6 dB is tested to be 40%. Such narrow bandwidth is caused by no matching layer, but it has almost no impact for acoustic trapping.
FIG. 2.

(A) Electrical impedance magnitude and phase of the transducer as a function of frequency; (B) The measured pulse echo waveform and normalized frequency spectrum.

A commercial PVDF needle hydrophone (Precision Acoustics, UK) was used to measure the acoustic pressure of this highly focused transducer with a voltage of 30 Vpp. The experimental acoustic pressure distribution (black solid line) in the lateral direction is shown in Fig. 3(A). The acoustic pressure at a frequency of 50 MHz exhibited a Gaussian distribution, and had a maximum value of 0.8 MPa at the focus point. There is no experimental method available to evaluate the trapping force of SBATs at frequencies higher than 40 MHz; hence, simulations were used as an alternative. The finite-element analysis and solver software package Comsol Multiphysics was used. The results of the simulations (shown as the red solid line in Fig. 3(A)) agreed with the experimental results. The acoustic pressure field distributions at the focal plane are shown in Fig. 3(B) (x–y plane) and 3(C) (x–z plane).
FIG. 3.

(A) amplitude of acoustic pressure at the focal plane (the black and red solid lines represent the experimental and simulation results, respectively); (B) pressure field distribution (x–y plane) at a frequency of 50 MHz; (C) pressure field distribution (x–z plane) at a frequency of 50 MHz.

The configuration used in the SBAT trapping experiment is described in Fig. 4(A). The highly focused transducer was set in a chamber filled with distilled water; the chamber had an acoustically transparent mylar film at the bottom of the opening. The transducer was mounted on a motorized three-axis positioner (SGSP 26-50, Sigma KOKI Co., Japan), and was controlled using customized LabVIEW programs. A CMOS camera (ORCA-Flash 2.8, Hamamatsu, Japan), in combination with an inverted microscope (IX-71, Olympus, Japan), was placed under the chamber, to record the motion of the trapped particles. For the experimental study, we selected 10-μm (diameter) polystyrene particles; the density, longitudinal wave velocity, and transverse wave velocity of these particles were 1050 kg/m, 2340 m/s, and 1100 m/s, respectively. In a single focused Gaussian beam, the acoustic radiation force can be evaluated by integrating the time-averaged radiation stress tensor over a surface enclosing the object: where the integral is carried over, and the whole surface of the particle and the differential area dA points to its outer normal. S is the time-averaged Brillouin radiation stress tensor: with ρ0 (1000 kg/m3) and c0 (1540 m/s) being the static mass density and sound velocity of the surrounding fluid, respectively, and the asterisk denoting the usual complex conjugation. Here, I is a unit tensor, and p = − iωρ0ψ and u = − ∇ψ are, respectively, the first-order velocity and pressure fields, which are related via the velocity potential ψ, with angular frequency ω. Using the measured value of the incident sound pressure p, ψ and u could be derived; after substituting for p and u in the Brillouin stress tensor , the acoustic radiation force on the PS sphere was obtained. Disregarding friction, there were four forces acting on the particle: gravity, buoyancy, the force resulting from the support provided by the mylar film, and the acoustic radiation force. The gravitational, buoyancy, and support forces were always in the axial direction. The acoustic radiation force, however, was related to the position of the particle in the single focused Gaussian beam, and could be decomposed into an axial radiation force and a transverse radiation force. In our experimental system, the total force on the polystyrene particle in the axial direction was always zero. A plot of the calculated transverse radiation force against the lateral distance away from focal beam center is shown in Fig. 4(B). It is worth noting that this force pointed to the focal beam center. At the focal beam center, no transverse radiation force existed, and the polystyrene particle was in a force equilibrium state. If a small lateral distance was produced between the particle center and the focal beam center by the movement of the transducer, a transverse radiation force was produced that pushed the particle back to the focal beam center. The transverse radiation force thus acted as the trapping force, the calculated value of which was on the order of nano-Newtons (nN).
FIG. 4.

(A) The configuration used in the SBAT trapping experiment; (B) plot of calculated transverse radiation force against the horizontal position of the center within a lateral distance (the red dashed line shows transverse radiation force = 0).

Figure 5 clearly demonstrates the capability of the SBATs based on a hydrothermal PZT thick film to trap and manipulate a single polystyrene particle (Multimedia view). A red circle is given as a reference point to show the location change of the microparticle. The hydrothermal PZT thick film transducer was driven by a sinusoidal burst with parameters of an excitation frequency of 50 MHz, a driving voltage of 30 Vpp, a duty cycle of 0.2%, and a pulse repetition frequency of 1 kHz. A series of images were captured at a frame rate of 10 frames per second. It was observed that—with no contact between transducer and microsphere—a single 10-μm polystyrene particle (in the red circle) was manipulated according to the movement of the transducer up (B), right (C) and down (D). This result suggests that hydrothermal PZT thick films are a good candidate material for SBAT applications. Because the size of the trapped particle is at the cellular level, the SBATs based on a hydrothermal PZT thick film could act as a single-cell manipulator for a wide range of applications in the biomedical and chemical sciences.
FIG. 5.

A single 10 μm polystyrene particle trapped and manipulated using an SBAT based on a hydrothermal PZT thick film. The polystyrene particle was trapped (A) and moved in the different directions: (B) Up, (C) Right, (D) Down. (Multimedia view) [URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4943492.1]

CONCLUSION

In summary, a 50-MHz, high-frequency ultrasound transducer with an f-number of 0.9 was obtained based on a hydrothermal PZT thick film with excellent piezoelectric property. The trapping force acting on a 10-μm microparticle in the acoustic microbeam produced by the obtained device was calculated to reach the nano-Newton level. This force led to the realization of contact-free microparticle trapping and manipulation in distilled water. Results from this study demonstrate that hydrothermal PZT thick films are a promising choice for the application of single-beam acoustic tweezers.
  18 in total

1.  Microfluidic sorting in an optical lattice.

Authors:  M P MacDonald; G C Spalding; K Dholakia
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-11-27       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Near-field-magnetic-tweezer manipulation of single DNA molecules.

Authors:  Jie Yan; Dunja Skoko; John F Marko
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2004-07-12

3.  On-chip manipulation of single microparticles, cells, and organisms using surface acoustic waves.

Authors:  Xiaoyun Ding; Sz-Chin Steven Lin; Brian Kiraly; Hongjun Yue; Sixing Li; I-Kao Chiang; Jinjie Shi; Stephen J Benkovic; Tony Jun Huang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Controlling cell-cell interactions using surface acoustic waves.

Authors:  Feng Guo; Peng Li; Jarrod B French; Zhangming Mao; Hong Zhao; Sixing Li; Nitesh Nama; James R Fick; Stephen J Benkovic; Tony Jun Huang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Radiation forces exerted on arbitrarily located sphere by acoustic tweezer.

Authors:  Jungwoo Lee; K Kirk Shung
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 6.  Single-molecule force spectroscopy: optical tweezers, magnetic tweezers and atomic force microscopy.

Authors:  Keir C Neuman; Attila Nagy
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 28.547

7.  A feasibility study of in vivo applications of single beam acoustic tweezers.

Authors:  Ying Li; Changyang Lee; Ruimin Chen; Qifa Zhou; K Kirk Shung
Journal:  Appl Phys Lett       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 3.791

8.  New fabrication of high-frequency (100-MHz) ultrasound PZT film kerfless linear array.

Authors:  Benpeng Zhu; Ngai Yui Chan; Jiyan Dai; K Kirk Shung; Shinichi Takeuchi; Qifa Zhou
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.725

9.  Targeted cell immobilization by ultrasound microbeam.

Authors:  Jungwoo Lee; Changyang Lee; Hyung Ham Kim; Anette Jakob; Robert Lemor; Shia-Yen Teh; Abraham Lee; Koping Kirk Shung
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  2011-02-19       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Design of efficient, broadband single-element (20-80 MHz) ultrasonic transducers for medical imaging applications.

Authors:  Jonathan M Cannata; Timothy A Ritter; Wo-Hsing Chen; Ronald H Silverman; K Kirk Shung
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.725

View more
  7 in total

1.  Contactless microparticle control via ultrahigh frequency needle type single beam acoustic tweezers.

Authors:  Chunlong Fei; Ying Li; Benpeng Zhu; Chi Tat Chiu; Zeyu Chen; Di Li; Yintang Yang; K Kirk Shung; Qifa Zhou
Journal:  Appl Phys Lett       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  Power MOSFET Linearizer of a High-Voltage Power Amplifier for High-Frequency Pulse-Echo Instrumentation.

Authors:  Hojong Choi; Park Chul Woo; Jung-Yeol Yeom; Changhan Yoon
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 3.576

3.  PIN-PMN-PT Single Crystal 1-3 Composite-based 20 MHz Ultrasound Phased Array.

Authors:  Wei Zhou; Tao Zhang; Jun Ou-Yang; Xiaofei Yang; Dawei Wu; Benpeng Zhu
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 2.891

4.  The forbidden band and size selectivity of acoustic radiation force trapping.

Authors:  Zhaoxi Li; Danfeng Wang; Chunlong Fei; Zhihai Qiu; Chenxue Hou; Runcong Wu; Di Li; Qidong Zhang; Dongdong Chen; Zeyu Chen; Wei Feng; Yintang Yang
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2020-12-26

5.  Single-Beam Acoustic Tweezer Prepared by Lead-Free KNN-Based Textured Ceramics.

Authors:  Yi Quan; Chunlong Fei; Wei Ren; Lingyan Wang; Jinyan Zhao; Jian Zhuang; Tianlong Zhao; Zhaoxi Li; Chenxi Zheng; Xinhao Sun; Kun Zheng; Zhe Wang; Matthew Xinhu Ren; Gang Niu; Nan Zhang; Tomoaki Karaki; Zhishui Jiang; Li Wen
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 2.891

Review 6.  Recent Development and Perspectives of Optimization Design Methods for Piezoelectric Ultrasonic Transducers.

Authors:  Dongdong Chen; Linwei Wang; Xingjun Luo; Chunlong Fei; Di Li; Guangbao Shan; Yintang Yang
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 2.891

7.  A Macro Lens-Based Optical System Design for Phototherapeutic Instrumentation.

Authors:  Hojong Choi; Se-Woon Choe; Jae-Myung Ryu
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 3.576

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.