Literature DB >> 27012714

Effects of cognitive load on neural and behavioral responses to smoking-cue distractors.

R Ross MacLean1,2,3, Travis T Nichols1, James M LeBreton1, Stephen J Wilson4,5.   

Abstract

Smoking cessation failures are frequently thought to reflect poor top-down regulatory control over behavior. Previous studies have suggested that smoking cues occupy limited working memory resources, an effect that may contribute to difficulty achieving abstinence. Few studies have evaluated the effects of cognitive load on the ability to actively maintain information in the face of distracting smoking cues. For the present study, we adapted an fMRI probed recall task under low and high cognitive load with three distractor conditions: control, neutral images, or smoking-related images. Consistent with a limited-resource model of cue reactivity, we predicted that the performance of daily smokers (n = 17) would be most impaired when high load was paired with smoking distractors. The results demonstrated a main effect of load, with decreased accuracy under high, as compared to low, cognitive load. Surprisingly, an interaction revealed that the effect of load was weakest in the smoking cue distractor condition. Along with this behavioral effect, we observed significantly greater activation of the right inferior frontal gyrus (rIFG) in the low-load condition than in the high-load condition for trials containing smoking cue distractors. Furthermore, load-related changes in rIFG activation partially mediated the effects of load on task accuracy in the smoking-cue distractor condition. These findings are discussed in the context of prevailing cognitive and cue reactivity theories. These results suggest that high cognitive load does not necessarily make smokers more susceptible to interference from smoking-related stimuli, and that elevated load may even have a buffering effect in the presence of smoking cues under certain conditions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cognitive load; Cue reactivity; Interference; Smoking; Working memory

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27012714      PMCID: PMC5361617          DOI: 10.3758/s13415-016-0416-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 1530-7026            Impact factor:   3.282


  48 in total

1.  A multi-dimensional analysis of cue-elicited craving in heavy smokers and tobacco chippers.

Authors:  M A Sayette; C S Martin; J M Wertz; S Shiffman; M A Perrott
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 6.526

2.  Comparing attentional bias to smoking cues in current smokers, former smokers, and non-smokers using a dot-probe task.

Authors:  Ronald N Ehrman; Steven J Robbins; Melissa A Bromwell; Megan E Lankford; John R Monterosso; Charles P O'Brien
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2002-07-01       Impact factor: 4.492

Review 3.  Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex.

Authors:  Adam R Aron; Trevor W Robbins; Russell A Poldrack
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  The smoking N-back: a measure of biased cue processing at varying levels of cognitive load.

Authors:  David E Evans; Christine Craig; Jason A Oliver; David J Drobes
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2010-12-01       Impact factor: 4.244

5.  Differential effects of distraction during working memory on delay-period activity in the prefrontal cortex and the visual association cortex.

Authors:  Jong H Yoon; Clayton E Curtis; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-10-14       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 6.  Relapse to smoking.

Authors:  Thomas M Piasecki
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2005-12-13

7.  Analysis of functional image analysis contest (FIAC) data with brainvoyager QX: From single-subject to cortically aligned group general linear model analysis and self-organizing group independent component analysis.

Authors:  Rainer Goebel; Fabrizio Esposito; Elia Formisano
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Working memory-related neural activity predicts future smoking relapse.

Authors:  James Loughead; E Paul Wileyto; Kosha Ruparel; Mary Falcone; Ryan Hopson; Ruben Gur; Caryn Lerman
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 7.853

9.  The neural basis of drug stimulus processing and craving: an activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis.

Authors:  Henry W Chase; Simon B Eickhoff; Angela R Laird; Lee Hogarth
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 13.382

10.  Beyond perceptual load and dilution: a review of the role of working memory in selective attention.

Authors:  Jan W de Fockert
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-05-21
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  The impact of affective information on working memory: A pair of meta-analytic reviews of behavioral and neuroimaging evidence.

Authors:  Susanne Schweizer; Ajay B Satpute; Shir Atzil; Andy P Field; Caitlin Hitchcock; Melissa Black; Lisa Feldman Barrett; Tim Dalgleish
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Anatomical and functional connectivity support the existence of a salience network node within the caudal ventrolateral prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Lucas R Trambaiolli; Xiaolong Peng; Hesheng Liu; Suzanne N Haber; Julia F Lehman; Gary Linn; Brian E Russ; Charles E Schroeder
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 8.713

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.