BACKGROUND: Volumetric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been extensively studied in the last decade as a method to help with the clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD). In recent years, researchers have also started investigating if that technique would be useful to identify individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), differentiating them from AD patients and from normal elderly controls. This research project was planned to assess the accuracy of volumetric MRI to differentiate those groups of individuals. METHOD: The investigation involved 39 patients with diagnosis of mild to moderate dementia in AD, according to the criteria of the NINCDS-ADRDA, DSM-III-R, and ICD-10; 21 subjects with complaints of cognitive decline without other psychiatric disorders (MCI); and 20 normal elderly controls. All the subjects were submitted to a standard protocol, including volumetric MRI evaluations. RESULTS: The results indicated that all regions of interest measured (amygdala, hippocampus, and parahippocampal gyrus) were significantly different (p < .005) in AD patients compared to MCI subjects and controls. The left volumetric measures (amygdala, hippocampus, and parahippocampal gyrus) were also significantly different between the MCI subjects and controls (p < .05). The discriminant function analysis correctly classified 88.14% of the AD patients and controls, 81.67% of AD patients and MCI subjects, and 80.49% of the MCI subjects and controls. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that measures of medial temporal lobe regions are useful to identify mild to moderate AD patients and MCI subjects, separating them from normal elderly individuals.
BACKGROUND: Volumetric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been extensively studied in the last decade as a method to help with the clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD). In recent years, researchers have also started investigating if that technique would be useful to identify individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), differentiating them from ADpatients and from normal elderly controls. This research project was planned to assess the accuracy of volumetric MRI to differentiate those groups of individuals. METHOD: The investigation involved 39 patients with diagnosis of mild to moderate dementia in AD, according to the criteria of the NINCDS-ADRDA, DSM-III-R, and ICD-10; 21 subjects with complaints of cognitive decline without other psychiatric disorders (MCI); and 20 normal elderly controls. All the subjects were submitted to a standard protocol, including volumetric MRI evaluations. RESULTS: The results indicated that all regions of interest measured (amygdala, hippocampus, and parahippocampal gyrus) were significantly different (p < .005) in ADpatients compared to MCI subjects and controls. The left volumetric measures (amygdala, hippocampus, and parahippocampal gyrus) were also significantly different between the MCI subjects and controls (p < .05). The discriminant function analysis correctly classified 88.14% of the ADpatients and controls, 81.67% of ADpatients and MCI subjects, and 80.49% of the MCI subjects and controls. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that measures of medial temporal lobe regions are useful to identify mild to moderate ADpatients and MCI subjects, separating them from normal elderly individuals.
Authors: J Delrieu; T Voisin; S Andrieu; S Belliard; J Belmin; F Blanchard; M Ceccaldi; J F Dartigues; B Defontaines; S Lehericy; C Mekies; O Moreaud; L Naccache; F Nourhashemi; P J Ousset; F Pasquier; P Payoux; F Puisieux; P Robert; J Touchon; B Vellas; B Dubois Journal: J Nutr Health Aging Date: 2009-06 Impact factor: 4.075
Authors: Jean-Philippe Fortin; Elizabeth M Sweeney; John Muschelli; Ciprian M Crainiceanu; Russell T Shinohara Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2016-02-23 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Michele L Ries; Cynthia M Carlsson; Howard A Rowley; Mark A Sager; Carey E Gleason; Sanjay Asthana; Sterling C Johnson Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2008-04-09 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Jennifer L Whitwell; Scott A Przybelski; Stephen D Weigand; David S Knopman; Bradley F Boeve; Ronald C Petersen; Clifford R Jack Journal: Brain Date: 2007-05-28 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Darren J Fernandes; Jacob Ellegood; Rand Askalan; Randy D Blakely; Emanuel Dicicco-Bloom; Sean E Egan; Lucy R Osborne; Craig M Powell; Armin Raznahan; Diane M Robins; Michael W Salter; Ameet S Sengar; Jeremy Veenstra-VanderWeele; R M Henkelman; Jason P Lerch Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2017-09-04 Impact factor: 6.556