Anne Baker1, Samantha Barker2, Amanda Sampson2, Clarissa Martin3. 1. 1 School of Allied Health, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia. 2. 2 Institute for Safety, Compensation and Recovery Research, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia. 3. 3 Department of Physiotherapy, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Abstract
AIM: To identify factors reported with negative and positive outcomes for caregivers of the traumatic brain injury and spinal cord injury cohorts, to investigate what interventions have been studied to support carers and to report what effectiveness has been found. METHODS: Scoping systematic review. Electronic databases and websites were searched from 1990 to December 2015. Studies were agreed for inclusion using pre-defined criteria. Relevant information from included studies was extracted and quality assessment was completed. Data were synthesised using qualitative methods. RESULTS: A total of 62 studies reported caregiver outcomes for the traumatic brain injury cohort; 51 reported negative outcomes and 11 reported positive outcomes. For the spinal cord injury cohort, 18 studies reported caregiver outcomes; 15 reported negative outcomes and three reported positive outcomes. Burden of care was over-represented in the literature for both cohorts, with few studies looking at factors associated with positive outcomes. Good family functioning, coping skills and social support were reported to mediate caregiver burden and promote positive outcomes. A total of 21 studies further described interventions to support traumatic brain injury caregivers and four described interventions to support spinal cord injury caregivers, with emerging evidence for the effectiveness of problem-solving training. Further research is required to explore the effects of injury severity of the care recipient, as well as caregiver age, on the outcome of the interventions. CONCLUSION: Most studies reported negative outcomes, suggesting that barriers to caregiving have been established, but not facilitators. The interventions described to support carers are limited and require further testing to confirm their effectiveness.
AIM: To identify factors reported with negative and positive outcomes for caregivers of the traumatic brain injury and spinal cord injury cohorts, to investigate what interventions have been studied to support carers and to report what effectiveness has been found. METHODS: Scoping systematic review. Electronic databases and websites were searched from 1990 to December 2015. Studies were agreed for inclusion using pre-defined criteria. Relevant information from included studies was extracted and quality assessment was completed. Data were synthesised using qualitative methods. RESULTS: A total of 62 studies reported caregiver outcomes for the traumatic brain injury cohort; 51 reported negative outcomes and 11 reported positive outcomes. For the spinal cord injury cohort, 18 studies reported caregiver outcomes; 15 reported negative outcomes and three reported positive outcomes. Burden of care was over-represented in the literature for both cohorts, with few studies looking at factors associated with positive outcomes. Good family functioning, coping skills and social support were reported to mediate caregiver burden and promote positive outcomes. A total of 21 studies further described interventions to support traumatic brain injury caregivers and four described interventions to support spinal cord injury caregivers, with emerging evidence for the effectiveness of problem-solving training. Further research is required to explore the effects of injury severity of the care recipient, as well as caregiver age, on the outcome of the interventions. CONCLUSION: Most studies reported negative outcomes, suggesting that barriers to caregiving have been established, but not facilitators. The interventions described to support carers are limited and require further testing to confirm their effectiveness.
Authors: Susan L Ryerson Espino; Erin H Kelly; Anne Rivelli; Kathy Zebracki; Lawrence C Vogel Journal: Spinal Cord Date: 2017-11-30 Impact factor: 2.772
Authors: Susan L Ryerson Espino; Kerry O'Rourke; Erin H Kelly; Alicia M January; Lawrence C Vogel Journal: Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil Date: 2022-01-19
Authors: Eline W M Scholten; Anneroos Kieftenbelt; Chantal F Hillebregt; Sonja de Groot; Marjolijn Ketelaar; Johanna M A Visser-Meily; Marcel W M Post Journal: Spinal Cord Date: 2018-01-16 Impact factor: 2.772
Authors: Pernille Langer Soendergaard; Mia Moth Wolffbrandt; Fin Biering-Sørensen; Malin Nordin; Trine Schow; Juan Carlos Arango-Lasprilla; Anne Norup Journal: Trials Date: 2019-11-27 Impact factor: 2.279