| Literature DB >> 27007393 |
Katarzyna Piotrowska1, Maciej Tarnowski2, Katarzyna Zgutka3, Andrzej Pawlik4.
Abstract
Intermittent fasting decreases glucose and insulin levels and increases insulin sensitivity and lifespan. Decreased food intake influences the liver. Previous studies have shown gender differences in response to various types of caloric restriction, including every-other-day (EOD) feeding, in humans and rodents. Our goal was to show the influence of prolonged EOD feeding on the morphology, proliferation and apoptosis of livers from male and female mice. After nine months of an EOD diet, the livers from male and female mice were collected. We examined their morphology on histological slides using the Hematoxilin and Eosine (H_E) method and Hoechst staining of cell nuclei to evaluate the nuclear area of hepatocytes. We also evaluated the expression of mRNA for proto-oncogens, pro-survival proteins and apoptotic markers using Real Time Polimerase Chain Reaction (PCR). We noted increased lipid content in the livers of EOD fed female mice. EOD feeding lead to a decrease of proliferation and apoptosis in the livers of female and male mice, which suggest that tissue maintenance occurred during EOD feeding. Our experiment revealed sex-specific expression of mRNA for proto-oncogenes and pro-survival and pro-apoptotic genes in mice as well as sex-specific responses to the EOD treatment.Entities:
Keywords: caloric restriction; every-other-day feeding; gender differences; liver; proto-oncogenes
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27007393 PMCID: PMC4808902 DOI: 10.3390/nu8030176
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
The sequences of the primers used to real-time PCR.
| c-myc-forward | 5′-TCACCAGCACAACTACGCCG |
|---|---|
| c-myc-reverse | 5′-TGCTTCAGGACCCTGCCACT |
| c-jun-forward | 5′-CATTGCCGCCTCCAAGTG |
| c-jun-reverse | 5′-CCAGCTCGGAGTTTTGCG |
| mTOR-forward | 5′-GTTTGTGGCTCTGAATGACC |
| mTOR-reverse | 5′-TCAGGATCTGGATGAGCATC |
| cyclD1-forward | 5′-GCGAAGTGGAGACCATCCG |
| cyclD1-reverse | 5′-GGTCTCCTCCGTCTTGAGC |
| RelA-forward | 5′-GCTCCTGTTCGAGTCTCCAT |
| RelA-reverse | 5′-TAGGTCCTTTTGCGCTTCTC |
| cyclE-forward | 5′-GGCGGACACAGCTTCGGGTC |
| cyclE-reverse | 5′-TGGGTCTTGCAAAAACACGGCCA |
| GSK3b-forvard | 5′-CCACCATCCTTATCCCTCCAC |
| GSK3b-reverse | 5′-GTATCTGAGGCTGCTGTGGC |
| Bcl-2-forward | 5′-GTC CCG CCT CTT CAC CTT TCA G |
| Bcl-2-reverse | 5′-GAT TCT GGT GTT TCC CCG TTG G |
| Bcl-xL -forward | 5′-AAC ATC CCA GCT TCA CAT AAC CCC |
| Bcl-xL-reverse | 5′-GCG ACC CCA GTT TAC TCC ATC C |
| Bax -forward | 5′-GCG TGG TTG CCC TCT TCT ACT TTG |
| Bax-reverse | 5′-AGT CCA GTG TCC AGC CCA TGA TG |
| Casp3-forward | 5′-ATGGAGAACAACAAAACCTCAGT |
| Casp3-reverse | 5′-TTGCTCCCATGTATGGTCTTTAC |
Body weight of animals on every-other-day (EOD) diet and ad libitum (AL) fed during 9 months of treatment.
| Body Weight (g) | Beginning of the Experiment | End of the Experiment | Gain of Weight (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 28.66 ± 0.75 | 41.79 ± 4.96 * | 45.81% | |
| 24.48 ± 1.47 | 29.67 ± 2.54 * | 21.2% | |
| 21.24 ± 1.15 | 30.13 ± 3.35 | 41.85% | |
| 22.14 ± 1.97 | 29.13 ± 2.46 | 31.57% |
Significantly different from AL group * p < 0.05.
Body mass and liver mass of animals on EOD diet and AL fed during 9 months of treatment.
| Body Weight (g) | Liver Weight (g) | Liver/Body Weight | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 41.79 ± 4.96 * | 1.74 ± 0.44 | 4.16% | |
| 29.67 ± 2.54 * | 1.42 ± 0.14 | 4.78% | |
| 30.13 ± 3.35 | 1.30 ± 0.37 | 4.31% | |
| 29.13 ± 2.46 | 1.42 ± 0.17 | 4.87% |
Significantly different from AL group * p < 0.05.
Figure 1Morphology of liver sections of male and female mice on EOD diet and AL fed. Representative microphotographs of livers are presented. Panel (A,B)—morphology of liver tissue, H-E staining, magnification of panels: (A) 400×, (B) 600× (oil immersion); black arrows indicate lipid vacuoles in hepatocytes of AL fed males, AL and EOD fed females; Panel (C)—Hepatocytes’ nuclei heterogeneity, Hoechst 34580 staining, magnification of panel (C) 400×; yellow asterisk indicates vacuole in hepatocyte’s nucleus of AL fed male mice; Panel (D)—Immunostaining of Bax in liver tissue; Yellow/brown pigmentation indicates positive immunoreactions in cytoplasm nuclei of cells, magnification of panel (D) 400×; Panel (E)—Immunostaining of Ki67 in liver tissue; Yellow/brown pigmentation indicates positive immunoreactions in nuclei of the cells, magnification of panel (E) 400×.
Hepatocyte nuclear area (µm2) of animals on EOD diet and AL fed.
| AL Males | EOD Males | AL Females | EOD Females | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Average | 72.66 * | 51.02 * | 54.02 * | 32.63 * |
| SD | ±25.51 | ±14.97 | 9.81 | 8.45 |
| median | 70.10 | 48.60 | 54.11 | 30.30 |
Significantly different from AL group * p < 0.001.
Figure 2Expression of mRNA for chosen protooncogenes in male and female mice on EOD diet and AL fed. Data expressed as relative mRNA abundance—fold change relative to AL animals as 1. Significantly different from AL group *p < 0.01.
Figure 3Expression of mRNA for chosen proapoptotic and antiapoptotic proteins in male and female mice on EOD diet and AL fed. Data expressed as relative mRNA abundance—fold change relative to control (AL). Significantly different from AL group * p < 0.01.