Literature DB >> 27005004

Improved confidence intervals for the linkage disequilibrium method for estimating effective population size.

A T Jones1, J R Ovenden2, Y-G Wang1.   

Abstract

The linkage disequilibrium method is currently the most widely used single sample estimator of genetic effective population size. The commonly used software packages come with two options, referred to as the parametric and jackknife methods, for computing the associated confidence intervals. However, little is known on the coverage performance of these methods, and the published data suggest there may be some room for improvement. Here, we propose two new methods for generating confidence intervals and compare them with the two in current use through a simulation study. The new confidence interval methods tend to be conservative but outperform the existing methods for generating confidence intervals under certain circumstances, such as those that may be encountered when making estimates using large numbers of single-nucleotide polymorphisms.

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27005004      PMCID: PMC5026751          DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2016.19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)        ISSN: 0018-067X            Impact factor:   3.821


  16 in total

1.  Two-locus sampling distributions and their application.

Authors:  R R Hudson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Genetic estimates of contemporary effective population size: to what time periods do the estimates apply?

Authors:  Robin S Waples
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 6.185

3.  simuPOP: a forward-time population genetics simulation environment.

Authors:  Bo Peng; Marek Kimmel
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2005-07-14       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Modelling evolutionary processes in small populations: not as ideal as you think.

Authors:  Robin S Waples; James R Faulkner
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 6.185

5.  Calculating Ne and Ne/N in age-structured populations: a hybrid Felsenstein-Hill approach.

Authors:  Robin S Waples; Chi Do; Julien Chopelet
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 5.499

6.  ldne: a program for estimating effective population size from data on linkage disequilibrium.

Authors:  Robin S Waples; Chi DO
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 7.090

7.  Intermittent breeding and constraints on litter size: consequences for effective population size per generation (Ne ) and per reproductive cycle (Nb ).

Authors:  Robin S Waples; Tiago Antao
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  A generalized approach for estimating effective population size from temporal changes in allele frequency.

Authors:  R S Waples
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Inferences about linkage disequilibrium.

Authors:  B S Weir
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Effects of overlapping generations on linkage disequilibrium estimates of effective population size.

Authors:  Robin S Waples; Tiago Antao; Gordon Luikart
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  18 in total

1.  Restoring faith in conservation action: Maintaining wild genetic diversity through the Tasmanian devil insurance program.

Authors:  Katherine A Farquharson; Elspeth A McLennan; Yuanyuan Cheng; Lauren Alexander; Samantha Fox; Andrew V Lee; Katherine Belov; Carolyn J Hogg
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2022-05-26

2.  Genome-wide SNPs detect no evidence of genetic population structure for reef manta rays (Mobula alfredi) in southern Mozambique.

Authors:  Stephanie K Venables; Andrea D Marshall; Amelia J Armstrong; Joseph L Tomkins; W Jason Kennington
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  The paradox of retained genetic diversity of Hippocampus guttulatus in the face of demographic decline.

Authors:  Rupert Stacy; Jorge Palma; Miguel Correia; Anthony B Wilson; José Pedro Andrade; Rita Castilho
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Genome-wide diversity and runs of homozygosity in the "Braque Français, type Pyrénées" dog breed.

Authors:  Salvatore Mastrangelo; Filippo Biscarini; Barbara Auzino; Marco Ragatzu; Andrea Spaterna; Roberta Ciampolini
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2018-01-09

5.  Keeping things local: Subpopulation Nb and Ne in a stream network with partial barriers to fish migration.

Authors:  Andrew R Whiteley; Jason A Coombs; Matthew J O'Donnell; Keith H Nislow; Benjamin H Letcher
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 5.183

6.  Comparing RADseq and microsatellites for estimating genetic diversity and relatedness - Implications for brown trout conservation.

Authors:  Alexandre Lemopoulos; Jenni M Prokkola; Silva Uusi-Heikkilä; Anti Vasemägi; Ari Huusko; Pekka Hyvärinen; Marja-Liisa Koljonen; Jarmo Koskiniemi; Anssi Vainikka
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Genomic signatures and correlates of widespread population declines in salmon.

Authors:  S J Lehnert; T Kess; P Bentzen; M P Kent; S Lien; J Gilbey; M Clément; N W Jeffery; R S Waples; I R Bradbury
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Long-term isolation at a low effective population size greatly reduced genetic diversity in Gulf of California fin whales.

Authors:  Vania E Rivera-León; Jorge Urbán; Sally Mizroch; Robert L Brownell; Tom Oosting; Wensi Hao; Per J Palsbøll; Martine Bérubé
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-08-27       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Pseudoreplication in genomic-scale data sets.

Authors:  Robin S Waples; Ryan K Waples; Eric J Ward
Journal:  Mol Ecol Resour       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 8.678

10.  Robust estimates of a high Ne/N ratio in a top marine predator, southern bluefin tuna.

Authors:  Robin S Waples; Peter M Grewe; Mark W Bravington; Richard Hillary; Pierre Feutry
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2018-07-18       Impact factor: 14.136

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.