Literature DB >> 24611912

Intermittent breeding and constraints on litter size: consequences for effective population size per generation (Ne ) and per reproductive cycle (Nb ).

Robin S Waples1, Tiago Antao.   

Abstract

In iteroparous species, it is easier to estimate Nb (effective number of breeders in one reproductive cycle) than Ne (effective population size per generation). Nb can be used as a proxy for Ne and also can provide crucial insights into eco-evolutionary processes that occur during reproduction. We used analytical and numerical methods to evaluate effects of intermittent breeding and litter/clutch size on inbreeding Nb and Ne . Fixed or random litter sizes ≥ 3 have little effect on either effective-size parameter; however, in species (e.g., many large mammals) in which females can produce only one offspring per cycle, female Nb  = ∞ and overall Nb  = 4Nb (male) . Intermittent breeding reduces the pool of female breeders, which reduces both female and overall Nb ; reductions are larger in high-fecundity species with high juvenile mortality and increase when multiple reproductive cycles are skipped. Simulated data for six model species showed that both intermittent breeding and litter-size constraints increase Ne , but only slightly. We show how to quantitatively account for these effects, which are important to consider when (1) using Nb to estimate Ne , or (2) drawing inferences about male reproductive success based on estimates of female Nb .
© 2014 The Author(s). Evolution © 2014 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Keywords:  Clutch size; computer simulations; intermittent breeding; iteroparity; overlapping generations

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24611912     DOI: 10.1111/evo.12384

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  14 in total

1.  Improved confidence intervals for the linkage disequilibrium method for estimating effective population size.

Authors:  A T Jones; J R Ovenden; Y-G Wang
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2016-03-23       Impact factor: 3.821

Review 2.  Prediction and estimation of effective population size.

Authors:  J Wang; E Santiago; A Caballero
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 3.821

3.  Life-history traits and effective population size in species with overlapping generations revisited: the importance of adult mortality.

Authors:  R S Waples
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 3.821

4.  Effects of overlapping generations on linkage disequilibrium estimates of effective population size.

Authors:  Robin S Waples; Tiago Antao; Gordon Luikart
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Harvest-induced evolution and effective population size.

Authors:  Anna Kuparinen; Jeffrey A Hutchings; Robin S Waples
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 5.183

6.  Reliable effective number of breeders/adult census size ratios in seasonal-breeding species: Opportunity for integrative demographic inferences based on capture-mark-recapture data and multilocus genotypes.

Authors:  Gregorio Sánchez-Montes; Jinliang Wang; Arturo H Ariño; José Luis Vizmanos; Iñigo Martínez-Solano
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-10-28       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Ecological and evolutionary consequences of alternative sex-change pathways in fish.

Authors:  C Benvenuto; I Coscia; J Chopelet; M Sala-Bozano; S Mariani
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Genetic substructure and admixture as important factors in linkage disequilibrium-based estimation of effective number of breeders in recovering wildlife populations.

Authors:  Alexander Kopatz; Hans Geir Eiken; Julia Schregel; Jouni Aspi; Ilpo Kojola; Snorre B Hagen
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Evaluation of the linkage-disequilibrium method for the estimation of effective population size when generations overlap: an empirical case.

Authors:  María Saura; Albert Tenesa; John A Woolliams; Almudena Fernández; Beatriz Villanueva
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  A critical assessment of estimating census population size from genetic population size (or vice versa) in three fishes.

Authors:  Matthew Carl Yates; Thais A Bernos; Dylan J Fraser
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 5.183

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.