Literature DB >> 27001946

Restoring motor control and sensory feedback in people with upper extremity amputations using arrays of 96 microelectrodes implanted in the median and ulnar nerves.

T S Davis1, H A C Wark, D T Hutchinson, D J Warren, K O'Neill, T Scheinblum, G A Clark, R A Normann, B Greger.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: An important goal of neuroprosthetic research is to establish bidirectional communication between the user and new prosthetic limbs that are capable of controlling >20 different movements. One strategy for achieving this goal is to interface the prosthetic limb directly with efferent and afferent fibres in the peripheral nervous system using an array of intrafascicular microelectrodes. This approach would provide access to a large number of independent neural pathways for controlling high degree-of-freedom prosthetic limbs, as well as evoking multiple-complex sensory percepts. APPROACH: Utah Slanted Electrode Arrays (USEAs, 96 recording/stimulating electrodes) were implanted for 30 days into the median (Subject 1-M, 31 years post-amputation) or ulnar (Subject 2-U, 1.5 years post-amputation) nerves of two amputees. Neural activity was recorded during intended movements of the subject's phantom fingers and a linear Kalman filter was used to decode the neural data. Microelectrode stimulation of varying amplitudes and frequencies was delivered via single or multiple electrodes to investigate the number, size and quality of sensory percepts that could be evoked. Device performance over time was assessed by measuring: electrode impedances, signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs), stimulation thresholds, number and stability of evoked percepts. MAIN
RESULTS: The subjects were able to proportionally, control individual fingers of a virtual robotic hand, with 13 different movements decoded offline (r = 0.48) and two movements decoded online. Electrical stimulation across one USEA evoked >80 sensory percepts. Varying the stimulation parameters modulated percept quality. Devices remained intrafascicularly implanted for the duration of the study with no significant changes in the SNRs or percept thresholds. SIGNIFICANCE: This study demonstrated that an array of 96 microelectrodes can be implanted into the human peripheral nervous system for up to 1 month durations. Such an array could provide intuitive control of a virtual prosthetic hand with broad sensory feedback.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27001946     DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/13/3/036001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  62 in total

Review 1.  Neural engineering: the process, applications, and its role in the future of medicine.

Authors:  Evon S Ereifej; Courtney E Shell; Jonathon S Schofield; Hamid Charkhkar; Ivana Cuberovic; Alan D Dorval; Emily L Graczyk; Takashi D Y Kozai; Kevin J Otto; Dustin J Tyler; Cristin G Welle; Alik S Widge; José Zariffa; Chet T Moritz; Dennis J Bourbeau; Paul D Marasco
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2019-11-12       Impact factor: 5.379

2.  Rodent model for assessing the long term safety and performance of peripheral nerve recording electrodes.

Authors:  Srikanth Vasudevan; Kunal Patel; Cristin Welle
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 5.379

3.  Zwitterionic Polymer Coating Suppresses Microglial Encapsulation to Neural Implants In Vitro and In Vivo.

Authors:  Qianru Yang; Bingchen Wu; James R Eles; Alberto L Vazquez; Takashi D Y Kozai; X Tracy Cui
Journal:  Adv Biosyst       Date:  2020-05-04

4.  A regenerative peripheral nerve interface allows real-time control of an artificial hand in upper limb amputees.

Authors:  Philip P Vu; Alex K Vaskov; Zachary T Irwin; Phillip T Henning; Daniel R Lueders; Ann T Laidlaw; Alicia J Davis; Chrono S Nu; Deanna H Gates; R Brent Gillespie; Stephen W P Kemp; Theodore A Kung; Cynthia A Chestek; Paul S Cederna
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 17.956

5.  Polydimethylsiloxane-based optical waveguides for tetherless powering of floating microstimulators.

Authors:  Ali Ersen; Mesut Sahin
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2017-05-01       Impact factor: 3.170

6.  Workshops of the Seventh International Brain-Computer Interface Meeting: Not Getting Lost in Translation.

Authors:  Jane E Huggins; Christoph Guger; Erik Aarnoutse; Brendan Allison; Charles W Anderson; Steven Bedrick; Walter Besio; Ricardo Chavarriaga; Jennifer L Collinger; An H Do; Christian Herff; Matthias Hohmann; Michelle Kinsella; Kyuhwa Lee; Fabien Lotte; Gernot Müller-Putz; Anton Nijholt; Elmar Pels; Betts Peters; Felix Putze; Rüdiger Rupp; Gerwin Schalk; Stephanie Scott; Michael Tangermann; Paul Tubig; Thorsten Zander
Journal:  Brain Comput Interfaces (Abingdon)       Date:  2019-12-10

7.  Mechanical fatigue resistance of an implantable branched lead system for a distributed set of longitudinal intrafascicular electrodes.

Authors:  A E Pena; S S Kuntaegowdanahalli; J J Abbas; J Patrick; K W Horch; R Jung
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 5.379

8.  In vitro multichannel single-unit recordings of action potentials from mouse sciatic nerve.

Authors:  L Chen; S J Ilham; T Guo; S Emadi; B Feng
Journal:  Biomed Phys Eng Express       Date:  2017-07-26

9.  Evoked Haptic Sensation in the Hand With Concurrent Non-Invasive Nerve Stimulation.

Authors:  Luis Vargas; Graham Whitehouse; He Huang; Yong Zhu; Xiaogang Hu
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 10.  Bionic intrafascicular interfaces for recording and stimulating peripheral nerve fibers.

Authors:  Ranu Jung; James J Abbas; Sathyakumar Kuntaegowdanahalli; Anil K Thota
Journal:  Bioelectron Med (Lond)       Date:  2017-12-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.